INTRODUCTION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATIONAL GUARD HOME RULE ACT; Congressional Record Vol. 165, No. 24
(Extensions of Remarks - February 07, 2019)
Formatting necessary for an accurate reading of this text may be shown by tags (e.g., <DELETED> or <BOLD>) or may be missing from this TXT display. For complete and accurate display of this text, see the PDF.
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E145]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
INTRODUCTION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATIONAL GUARD HOME RULE ACT
______
HON. ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON
of the district of columbia
in the house of representatives
Thursday, February 7, 2019
Ms. NORTON. Madam Speaker, today, I introduce the District of
Columbia National Guard Home Rule Act, a bill that would give the mayor
of the District of Columbia authority to deploy the D.C. National
Guard, after consultation with the Commanding General of the D.C.
National Guard, with the President retaining authority on federal
matters. In local emergencies, including natural disasters and civil
disturbances unrelated to national or homeland security, the mayor of
the District should have the same authority that governors exercise
over the National Guard in their states and territories. Each
governor--including the governors of the three U.S. territories with
Guards--has the authority to deploy the National Guard to protect his
or her state or territory, just as local militia did historically.
The National Guards in the 50 states and territories operate under
dual federal and local jurisdiction. Yet only the President currently
has the authority to deploy the D.C. National Guard for both national
and local purposes. Today, by far the most likely need for the D.C.
National Guard here would be for natural disasters, such as hurricanes
and floods, and to restore order in the wake of civil disturbances. The
mayor, who knows the city better than any federal official and who
works closely with federal security officials, should be able to call
on the D.C. National Guard for local natural disasters and civil
disturbances, after consultation with the Commanding General of the
D.C. National Guard. The President should be focused on national
matters, including homeland security, not local D.C. matters. Homeland
security authority, with respect to the D.C. National Guard, would
remain the sole province of the President, along with the power to
federalize the D.C. National Guard for federal matters at will. It does
no harm to give the mayor authority to deploy the Guard for civil
disturbances and natural disasters. However, it could do significant
harm to leave the mayor powerless to act quickly. If it makes sense
that governors would have control over the deployment of their National
Guards, it makes equal sense for the mayor of the District, with a
population the size of a small state, to have the same authority.
The mayor of the District, as chief executive, should have the
authority to deploy the D.C. National Guard in instances that do not
rise to the level of federal homeland security activities. My bill
permits the mayor to deploy the D.C. National Guard only after
consultation with the Commanding General of the D.C. National Guard.
The bill is another important step toward completing the transfer of
full self-government powers to the District that Congress began with
the passage of the Home Rule Act of 1973, when it delegated most of its
authority over District matters to an elected mayor and Council. The
bill follows that model.
I urge my colleagues to support the bill.
____________________