April 4, 2019 - Issue: Vol. 165, No. 59 — Daily Edition116th Congress (2019 - 2020) - 1st Session

[Page H3087]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




AUTHORIZING THE CLERK TO MAKE CORRECTIONS IN ENGROSSMENT OF H.R. 1585, 
           VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN REAUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2019

  Mr. NADLER. Madam Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that in the 
engrossment of H.R. 1585, the Clerk be authorized to correct section 
numbers, punctuation, spelling, and cross-references and to make such 
other technical and conforming changes as may be necessary to reflect 
the actions of the House, including the changes now at the desk.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Clerk will report the changes.
  The Clerk read as follows:

       In amendment number 7 offered by Ms. Waters of California, 
     modify the amendatory instruction to read:
       ``Page 39, line 6, insert after `efforts.' the following:''
       In amendment number 9 offered by Ms. Johnson of Texas, 
     modify the ninth amendatory instruction to read:
       ``Page 62, beginning on line 1, strike `internal emergency 
     transfers' and insert `internal transfers' ''; modify the 
     tenth amendatory instruction to read:
       ``Page 62, line 3, strike `external emergency transfers' 
     and insert `external transfers' ''; and modify the twenty-
     second amendatory instruction to read:
       ``Page 80, line 24, strike `external emergency transfers' 
     and insert `external transfers' ''.
       In amendment number 13 offered by Mr. Grijalva of Arizona, 
     modify the amendatory instruction to read:
       ``Page 134, strike line 3 and all that follows thru page 
     135, line 5, and insert the following:''; and add at the end 
     the following amendatory instruction:
       ``Strike page 135, lines 16 through 18.''

  Mr. NADLER (during the reading). Madam Speaker, I ask unanimous 
consent that the changes be considered as read and printed in the 
Record.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from New York?
  There was no objection.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the original request 
of the gentleman from New York?
  There was no objection.

                          ____________________