April 9, 2019 - Issue: Vol. 165, No. 61 — Daily Edition116th Congress (2019 - 2020) - 1st Session
All in Senate sectionPrev20 of 63Next
Nomination of Cheryl Marie Stanton (Executive Calendar); Congressional Record Vol. 165, No. 61
(Senate - April 09, 2019)
Text available as:
Formatting necessary for an accurate reading of this text may be shown by tags (e.g., <DELETED> or <BOLD>) or may be missing from this TXT display. For complete and accurate display of this text, see the PDF.
[Pages S2313-S2314] From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] Nomination of Cheryl Marie Stanton Madam President, President Trump has made big promises to workers in Alaska and Ohio and across the country. He has promised workers everywhere that he will put American workers first. Yet we know in Lordstown and from his court appointments, which have put a thumb on the scale of justice as they have chosen corporations over workers, that he has betrayed those workers. The people he has put in charge haven't looked out for workers. Over and over again, they have put their thumbs on the scale for corporations. His Cabinet, frankly, looks like a retreat for Wall Street. His latest nominee for the Department of Labor is more of the same, another nominee who puts corporations over workers. Cheryl Stanton is nominated to be Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division. This is not an especially well-known Agency to most Americans, but it is a critical job for all American workers. The Administrator is the person in charge of enforcing overtime rules, the minimum wage, child labor, and the Family Medical Leave Act. These are all Federal laws. The minimum wage is a Federal law. The overtime rule is a Federal law. The Family Medical Leave Act is a Federal law, as is the law regarding child labor. These are all Federal laws, but they don't mean much if they are not enforced. You don't want a fox in a chicken coop. You want to make sure that these laws are enforced by somebody who is not on the side of corporate interests, as too many in this Senate are and as too many in this administration are; you want somebody who is on the side of the workers. The job of Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division should be to look out for American workers when companies try to cheat them out of the pay that they have earned. But Ms. Stanton spent a decade defending corporations--that is right, defending the corporations against American workers when they stole workers' [[Page S2314]] wages. So she has been on the side of these companies when workers tried to make sure they got fair wages and fair overtime and that child labor laws were protected and the Family Medical Leave Act. She has taken the other side, that of the corporations. Now the President has put her in a job where she is supposed to look out for workers, but who knows if she will really do that. Let's look at some of her history: a decade defending corporations and then she headed South Carolina's workforce agency that manages State unemployment insurance. When accounting errors resulted in overpayments of unemployment insurance--these weren't errors made by workers; these were accounting errors made that the workers didn't have anything to do with. When accounting errors resulted in overpayments of unemployment insurance to workers looking for jobs, she went after the workers, garnishing their wages. Maybe worst of all, interestingly, she failed to pay her own house cleaners until they took her to court. Think about that. The person who is supposed to be in charge of making sure corporations pay their workers, whether it is minimum wage, whether it is overtime, whether it is enforcing child labor laws, whether it is enforcing the Family Medical Leave Act--she is the person who is supposed to be in charge of making sure corporations pay their workers, and she didn't pay workers at her own house. If you want to get a measure of a person, look at how they treat people whom they are allowed to mistreat, say it that way. Look at how they treat people who have less power than they do; how they treat the waitstaff at a restaurant, how they treat the entry-level staff in their office, how they treat the person who cleans their hotel room or cleans their office. My favorite quote from the Bible--one of my favorite quotes--is from Matthew 25, when Jesus said as follows: When I was hungry, you fed me; when I was thirsty, you gave me drink; when I was a stranger, you welcomed me. What you did for the least of these, you did for me. I thought about that, and I know there is no way Jesus or Muhammad or Buddha or any of the great religious leaders would say somebody is worth less than somebody else, that a page is worth less than a Parliamentarian, for instance, or that the Presiding Officer is worth less than the person who is sitting at the desk. So Matthew 25 is exactly right. No worker is worth less than Ms. Stanton. No Senator is worth more or less than anybody else. I mean, Matthew 25 speaks to equality, speaks to the sort of way we should be treating people who may have lesser titles than we have. I think of that when I think about Ms. Stanton and the job she has been nominated for. The workers whom she will be in a position to help or hurt--her career so far, she has been in positions where she has hurt workers, but the position she is in that she can help or hurt workers, these workers shouldn't be treated with less respect. Their work has dignity. Whether they swipe a badge or punch a clock, whether they work for tips, whether they work on a salary, whether they raise children, whether they take care of an aging parent, their work has dignity. If you love your country, you fight for the people who make it work, regardless of their kind of work. Whether they are working construction, whether they are a nurse, whether they are a housekeeper, whether they are a salesperson, whether they work at a counter in a fast-food restaurant, whether they are a page, whether they are a Senator, all work has dignity. I think it is important, when you think about Ms. Stanton and the job she has, that these workers have earned this pay, whether it is minimum wage, whether it is overtime, whether it is child labor laws, whether it is the Family Medical Leave Act. When work has dignity, people are paid the wages they earn; they are paid a living wage; they have power over their schedules. It is about wages; it is about benefits; it is about the dignity of work; and it is about a safe workplace; it is about childcare. It is about all of those things. Workers should not be intimidated into accepting less just because they can't afford a fancy law firm. We need people in government who understand that. We need people who understand that, when you love this country, you fight for those people who make it work. The last thing we need is an administration with more people serving in Washington who don't value work or respect the Americans who do. This is another nominee from the President of the United States who will put her thumb or who has put his thumb on the scale to support corporations over workers, to support Wall Street over consumers, to support big insurance companies over sick people. We don't need another one of those in this administration, whether at EPA, whether at the Department of Labor, whether at the Federal Reserve, or whether at the White House. I urge my colleagues, as this nomination comes forward, as Ms. Stanton comes forward to be Chief of the Wage and Hour Division--Cheryl Stanton--to be Administrator for the Wage and Hour Division, I urge my colleagues to listen a little more to the Americans whom we serve and a little less to big corporations that always have their way in this body--always have their way in this body. I urge my colleagues to listen a little less to those corporations trying to squeeze every last penny out of their workers and reject this nomination. I yield the floor. I suggest the absence of a quorum. The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Cassidy). The clerk will call the roll. The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll. Mrs. FISCHER. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
All in Senate sectionPrev20 of 63Next