May 14, 2019 - Issue: Vol. 165, No. 80 — Daily Edition116th Congress (2019 - 2020) - 1st Session
All in House sectionPrev25 of 117Next
DHS ACQUISITION DOCUMENTATION INTEGRITY ACT OF 2019; Congressional Record Vol. 165, No. 80
(House of Representatives - May 14, 2019)
Text available as:
Formatting necessary for an accurate reading of this text may be shown by tags (e.g., <DELETED> or <BOLD>) or may be missing from this TXT display. For complete and accurate display of this text, see the PDF.
[Pages H3759-H3761] From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] DHS ACQUISITION DOCUMENTATION INTEGRITY ACT OF 2019 Ms. TORRES SMALL of New Mexico. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 1912) to amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to provide for requirements relating to documentation for major acquisition programs, and for other purposes. The Clerk read the title of the bill. The text of the bill is as follows: H.R. 1912 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``DHS Acquisition Documentation Integrity Act of 2019''. SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ACQUISITION DOCUMENTATION. (a) In General.--Title VII of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 341 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section: ``SEC. 711. ACQUISITION DOCUMENTATION. ``(a) In General.--For each major acquisition program, the Secretary, acting through the Under Secretary for Management, shall require the head of a relevant component or office to-- ``(1) maintain acquisition documentation that is complete, accurate, timely, and valid, and that includes, at a minimum-- ``(A) operational requirements that are validated consistent with departmental policy and changes to such requirements, as appropriate; ``(B) a complete lifecycle cost estimate with supporting documentation; ``(C) verification of such lifecycle cost estimate against independent cost estimates, and reconciliation of any differences; ``(D) a cost-benefit analysis with supporting documentation; and ``(E) a schedule, including, as appropriate, an integrated master schedule; ``(2) prepare cost estimates and schedules for major acquisition programs, as required [[Page H3760]] under subparagraphs (B) and (E), in a manner consistent with best practices as identified by the Comptroller General of the United States; and ``(3) submit certain acquisition documentation to the Secretary to produce for submission to Congress an annual comprehensive report on the status of departmental acquisitions. ``(b) Waiver.--On a case-by-case basis with respect to any major acquisition program under this section, the Secretary may waive the requirement under paragraph (3) of subsection (a) for a fiscal year if either-- ``(1) such program has not-- ``(A) entered the full rate production phase in the acquisition lifecycle; ``(B) had a reasonable cost estimate established; and ``(C) had a system configuration defined fully; or ``(2) such program does not meet the definition of capital asset, as such term is defined by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget. ``(c) Congressional Oversight.--At the same time the President's budget is submitted for a fiscal year under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary shall make information available, as applicable, to the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate regarding the requirement described in subsection (a) in the prior fiscal year that includes the following specific information regarding each major acquisition program for which the Secretary has issued a waiver under subsection (b): ``(1) The grounds for granting a waiver for such program. ``(2) The projected cost of such program. ``(3) The proportion of a component's or office's annual acquisition budget attributed to such program, as available. ``(4) Information on the significance of such program with respect to the component's or office's operations and execution of its mission. ``(d) Major Acquisition Program Defined.--In this section, the term `major acquisition program' means a Department acquisition program that is estimated by the Secretary to require an eventual total expenditure of at least $300,000,000 (based on fiscal year 2019 constant dollars) over its lifecycle cost.''. (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents in section 1(b) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.) is amended by adding after the item related to section 707 the following new item: ``Sec. 711. Acquisition documentation.''. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentlewoman from New Mexico (Ms. Torres Small) and the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Joyce) each will control 20 minutes. The Chair recognizes the gentlewoman from New Mexico. General Leave Ms. TORRES SMALL of New Mexico. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and to include extraneous material on this matter. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the gentlewoman from New Mexico? There was no objection. Ms. TORRES SMALL of New Mexico. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 1912, a measure I introduced with the support of Congressman Dan Crenshaw to ensure the Department of Homeland Security effectively manages its largest acquisitions, those with an estimated lifecycle cost of $300 million or more. Each year, DHS invests billions of dollars in its acquisition programs to help execute its many critical missions. However, since the Department was created, DHS has struggled to keep some of its largest programs on schedule and on budget. For example, the Department's attempts to modernize and integrate its various financial management systems has been in the works for 15 years with little to show for its multimillion expenditures. A plan to deliver a DHS-wide human resources IT system has faced similar delays, as has a decade-long attempt to consolidate the Department's headquarters at the St. Elizabeths campus in southeast Washington, D.C. The Department's acquisition management challenges have been on the Government Accountability Office's high-risk list since 2005. GAO has identified shortfalls, including acquisition programs lacking key analyses and schedules. H.R. 1912, the DHS Acquisition Documentation Integrity Act of 2019, would attempt to address some of these concerns by requiring DHS to maintain complete, accurate, timely, and valid documentation for all its major acquisitions. This includes documentation such as lifecycle cost estimates, cost-benefit analyses, and project schedules. Codifying these acquisition documentation requirements, which are already embodied in DHS acquisition policy, is necessary to safeguard against future cost overruns and schedule delays. A previous version of this bill passed the House unanimously in the 115th Congress, and I urge my colleagues to pass it again today. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time. Mr. JOYCE of Pennsylvania. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 1912, the DHS Acquisition Documentation Integrity Act of 2019. This legislation requires the Department of Homeland Security to better document its major acquisition programs that are essential to keeping America safe. While every Member of Congress will agree that protecting our Nation and its citizens is vitally important, we must also agree that protecting taxpayer dollars and ensuring accountability for the government agencies is also essential. The Government Accountability Office assists Congress in its efforts to ensure accountability by producing a report every 2 years that identifies areas in the Federal Government that are at high risk of waste, fraud, and abuse. Major acquisitions by DHS have consistently been identified by the GAO as high risk. This legislation requires DHS to improve management of its major purchases of systems to secure the border, provide screening for travelers, and protect our shores, and for our other vital missions. Too often, DHS has failed to document what these programs will cost, when they will be completed, and what they will deliver. It is unacceptable to spend billions of taxpayer dollars and not document this important information. To address these issues, DHS has updated its acquisition policy to follow corporate best practices. However, it must take additional steps to ensure its components adhere to these policies. H.R. 1912 provides important tools to ensure that these policies are being followed. It will improve visibility into DHS major acquisition programs and promote better management of DHS acquisitions of items that are expected to cost more than $300 million. Under the bill, the Undersecretary for Management must require the relevant component or office to maintain documentation that provides validated operational requirements, a complete lifecycle cost estimate, an independent verification of that cost estimate, a cost-benefit analysis of the program, and a complete schedule for the acquisition program. With this documentation, Congress and other government watchdogs will be able to conduct necessary oversight to ensure that taxpayer dollars are being spent efficiently and effectively. This bill passed the House of Representatives by voice vote in both the 114th and 115th Congresses. Mr. Speaker, I commend Representative Torres Small for reintroducing this language, and I urge my colleagues to support this bill. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time. Ms. TORRES SMALL of New Mexico. Mr. Speaker, it is not enough for the Department of Homeland Security to simply analyze the upfront costs of acquiring systems to fulfill capability gaps. DHS must also budget for the long-term operation and maintenance costs of a system. Given the criticality and budgetary risks associated with major acquisitions, it is critical that requirements are created, alternatives are considered, a cost estimate is completed, and a schedule is developed. It falls to us, the Congress, to ensure that the Department has reliable acquisition documentation in place. Enactment of H.R. 1912 will ensure that DHS does its homework and is a good steward of taxpayer dollars. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the gentlewoman from New Mexico [[Page H3761]] (Ms. Torres Small) that the House suspend the rules and pass the bill, H.R. 1912. The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the rules were suspended and the bill was passed. A motion to reconsider was laid on the table. ____________________
All in House sectionPrev25 of 117Next