Formatting necessary for an accurate reading of this text may be shown by tags (e.g., <DELETED> or <BOLD>) or may be missing from this TXT display. For complete and accurate display of this text, see the PDF.
[Pages S4587-S4588]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
BORDER SECURITY
Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President, 8 weeks ago, the administration sent
Congress an urgent request for humanitarian money for the border. For 8
weeks, we have seen evidence nearly every day that the conditions have
been getting worse. Yet, during all of this time, our Democratic House
colleagues have been unable to produce a clean measure to provide this
humanitarian funding with its having any chance of becoming law.
The proposal they finally passed this week was way to the left of the
mainstream. The President made it clear it would earn a veto, not a
signature. Even so, in an abundance of fairness, the Senate voted on
Speaker Pelosi's effort--poison pill riders and all. It earned just 37
votes. The House proposal earned 37 votes here. Fortunately, we do have
a chance to make
[[Page S4588]]
law this week on a hugely bipartisan basis.
The Senate advanced a clean, simple humanitarian funding bill
yesterday by a huge margin. Thanks to Chairman Shelby and Senator
Leahy, this bipartisan package sailed through the Appropriations
Committee 30 to 1, and it passed the full Senate yesterday--now listen
to this--84 to 8. We sent that clean bill over to the House by a vote
of 84 to 8. The Shelby-Leahy legislation has unified the Appropriations
Committee, and it has unified the Senate. The administration would sign
it into law.
So all that our House colleagues need to do to help the men, women,
and children on the border this week is to pass this unifying
bipartisan bill and send it to the President. For weeks, we have heard
our House Democratic colleagues speaking a lot about the poor
conditions, the overstretched facilities, the insufficient supplies.
Our bill gives them the chance today to actually do something about it.
Now, I understand that instead of moving forward with this bipartisan
bill, the Speaker is signaling she may choose to drag out the process
even more and might persist in some variety of the leftwing demands
that caused the House bill to fail dramatically in the Senate
yesterday. I understand that some of the further changes the House
Democrats are discussing may be unobjectionable things the Trump
administration may be able to help to secure for them administratively.
Yet it is crystal clear that some of these new demands would drag
this bipartisan bill way back to the left and jeopardize the Shelby-
Leahy consensus product that unified the Senate and that is so close to
becoming law--this close.
For example, I understand that the House Democrats may ask the
Speaker to insist on--listen to this--cutting the supplemental funding
for Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Department of Defense.
In the middle of this historic surge on the border, they want to claw
back some of this badly needed money from the men and women who are
down there on the frontlines. It looks like these cuts would represent
pay cuts to ICE staff, including pay that people have already earned,
and cuts to the money for investigating child trafficking.
Chairman Shelby and Senator Leahy have already reached a bipartisan
agreement. Both sides have already compromised. We are standing at the
5-yard line. Yet, apparently, some in the House want to dig back into
that ``abolish ICE'' playbook and throw a far-left partisan wrench into
the whole thing.
Let me be perfectly clear. I am glad the Speaker and the
administration are discussing some of these outstanding issues, but if
the House Democrats send the Senate back some partisan effort to
disrupt our bipartisan progress, we will simply move to table it. The
U.S. Senate is not going to pass a border funding bill that will cut
the money for ICE and the Department of Defense. It is not going to
happen. We already have our compromise. The Shelby-Leahy Senate bill is
the only game in town. It is time to quit playing games. It is time to
make it law.
I urge my colleagues across the Capitol to take up the clean,
bipartisan bill that the Senate passed 84 to 8 and, without any more
unnecessary delays, send it on to President Trump for his signature.
____________________
