Formatting necessary for an accurate reading of this text may be shown by tags (e.g., <DELETED> or <BOLD>) or may be missing from this TXT display. For complete and accurate display of this text, see the PDF.
[Pages S4957-S4958]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
NOMINATION OF MARK T. ESPER
Mr. McCONNELL. Madam President, the Senate's first order of business
this week will be confirming a thoroughly well-prepared nominee to a
post of vital national importance. Later today, we will vote to advance
the nomination of Dr. Mark Esper to serve as Secretary of Defense, and
we will vote on his confirmation tomorrow.
When Dr. Esper was nominated in July of 2017 to serve as Secretary of
the Army, he already possessed an impressive record that spanned public
service, the private sector, and, of course, his distinguished service
in uniform. As a student, he excelled at West Point. He served
honorably in combat during the Gulf war as an infantry officer with
Kentucky's own 101st Airborne, the Screaming Eagles. He then later
obtained a master's degree from the Kennedy School at Harvard and a
Ph.D. from George Washington University.
In the years since, Dr. Esper has continued to serve his country,
compiling an outstanding record in public service. He has served as
Deputy Assistant Secretary at the Pentagon; as a Senate-appointed
member of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission; and,
of course, as a trusted staff expert right here in the Capitol.
As a result, many of our colleagues have been familiar with this
nominee for more than a decade. Members on both sides remember Mark
Esper from his time on staff with our former colleague Chuck Hagel.
Some knew him during his tenure with the Foreign Relations Committee or
with what was
[[Page S4958]]
then the Governmental Affairs Committee, and many of us inevitably
crossed paths with the smart and level-headed national security adviser
for Majority Leader Bill Frist.
So, when President Trump first nominated Dr. Esper to be Secretary of
the Army 2 years ago, my colleagues and I were well acquainted with his
expertise, his professionalism, and his patriotic dedication to the men
and women who serve to keep us safe. It is no wonder that this body
confirmed him to that post by an overwhelming bipartisan margin. Since
then, Secretary Esper has continued to impress. He has continued to
earn the praise of experts and colleagues from every corner of the
national security landscape.
``He's highly regarded inside the Army. Soldiers like him.''
He is ``someone who can work across the aisle . . . somebody who can
work with Congress.''
Additionally, he is ``superbly well qualified by experience and
temperament for the position.''
Another quote: ``The nation would be lucky to have Mark serve in any
capacity . . . He is particularly well-suited to step into one of the
most important jobs in the world.''
This is high praise from former Pentagon officials of the Obama years
and from widely recognized national security professionals. Just last
week, our colleagues on the Armed Services Committee offered a ringing
endorsement of their own by voting by voice to favorably report his
nomination to the floor.
It would be hard to draw up a more compelling case than the one in
front of us for confirming Dr. Mark Esper, and it is hard to imagine a
more persuasive argument for doing it right away--with no further
delay--than the front pages of newspapers all around the world every
day.
The world is full of serious threats to America, to our allies, and
to our interests. Not the least among them, obviously, is Iran's
insistence on continuing to ratchet up tensions in the Middle East.
Having a Senate-confirmed Secretary of Defense, especially one of this
quality, could not have come a moment too soon.
In closing, when Secretary Esper took his last job, he wrote Army
personnel a letter that laid out three priorities: readiness,
modernization, and reform. Since then, he has played an active role in
this administration's efforts to restore the primacy and lethality of
America's fighting forces, and the success of defense authorizations
and ongoing operations abroad bear his fingerprints.
We are reminded every day that this work continues, and we are
reminded why. My colleagues should be proud to join me today in voting
to advance the Esper nomination and in putting the right man on the
job.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Texas.
____________________