NATURAL DISASTER PREPARATION; Congressional Record Vol. 165, No. 157
(House of Representatives - September 27, 2019)

Text available as:

Formatting necessary for an accurate reading of this text may be shown by tags (e.g., <DELETED> or <BOLD>) or may be missing from this TXT display. For complete and accurate display of this text, see the PDF.


[Pages H8076-H8077]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                      NATURAL DISASTER PREPARATION

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of 
January 3, 2019, the gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Neguse) is recognized 
for the remainder of the hour as the designee of the majority leader.
  Mr. NEGUSE. Madam Speaker, I first want to thank the gentleman from 
California for his courtesy and, of course, that of the majority 
leader.
  Madam Speaker, I rise today to call attention to a failure of our 
government to issue a promised and required

[[Page H8077]]

set of regulatory guidance in a timely manner and a failure of our 
government to adequately prepare the American people for natural 
disasters and to provide relief for suffering communities.
  I happen to represent the great State of Colorado's Second 
Congressional District, and my State is no stranger to catastrophic 
weather events. Exacerbated by the dangers we face from the threat of 
climate change, we regularly experience forest fires, tornadoes, and 
other disasters. Six years ago, we experienced historic flooding most 
severely impacting Boulder County and Larimer County, both counties in 
my district.
  In September of 2013, we were inundated with heavy rainfall with up 
to 15 inches of rainfall in 1 week in some areas. The result was 
devastating flooding across the front range of Colorado.

                              {time}  1200

  The storms took the lives of 10 Coloradans and caused nearly $4 
billion in damage across 21 counties in our State, the most expensive 
disaster in Colorado's history. Rivers and creeks overflowed. Waters 
seeped into the homes of thousands and displaced 18,147 people across 
our State. Roads and bridges, as you can see here, were completely 
washed out. Much infrastructure was destroyed.
  My district, as I mentioned, contains two of the counties that were 
the hardest hit by these events, Boulder and Larimer Counties.
  Yet, today, more than 6 years later, many of these communities have 
still not been able to recover from the flooding fully.
  Rebuilding from a disaster this severe is a lengthy and expensive 
process. However, it is made more difficult by Federal grant 
regulations set by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, or FEMA, 
that require cities and counties to rebuild infrastructure in the exact 
same way it had been built before the disaster in order to qualify for 
reimbursement.
  If these counties were to rebuild the roads and bridges that were 
destroyed in the flood the same way they were originally built, it 
would put these same communities at risk of future disasters once 
again.
  There is a lack of clarity and consistency for these cities and 
counties, as well as countless other cities and counties across the 
country, in FEMA's current determination of reimbursements.
  Many projects in my district have been deemed ``not cost-effective'' 
because the counties made an adjustment and wanted to improve their 
infrastructure, not just rebuild the same road right next to a river 
that would be washed out again with the next flood.
  Now, the good news is, Madam Speaker, that Congress has already acted 
in a bipartisan way to show that we understand this problem. Section 
1235 of the Disaster Recovery Reform Act passed last year, in 2018, and 
it required that FEMA issue interim guidance, which is based on ``the 
latest consensus-based codes and standards'' within 60 days of that law 
being enacted.
  Just to give you a sense of context in terms of time, the law was 
signed by the President on October 5, 2018. It has been almost an 
entire year since this bill was signed into law, yet FEMA has issued no 
interim guidance.
  I understand. I get it. I recognize that it may take longer than 60 
days, maybe 90 days, maybe 120 days. But an entire year?
  This endangers not just the financial security of counties in 
Colorado that have millions of dollars at risk based on the pending 
project determinations, but it demonstrates a fundamental failure by 
the United States Government. There is simply no excuse for the 
extensive delay that FEMA has taken in issuing this interim guidance.
  Millions of dollars are at risk every day that counties have to wait 
to learn if their projects will be reimbursed or covered under FEMA 
rulemaking.
  I know there are hardworking people at FEMA who are doing their jobs 
each and every day to protect communities across our country, but I 
would just implore the Agency--and we have certainly communicated this 
directly to the Agency--that it should not have taken 6 years for 
communities to rebuild their infrastructure after a flood fully, and it 
certainly should not be caused by delays from red tape at the Federal 
level.
  Promises were made by the Agency to get this rulemaking done. I urge 
FEMA to take action to issue this guidance in the last few days of 
September, as they promised.
  We have just a few more days, Madam Speaker, until the month 
concludes. My constituents are waiting. The counties are waiting. The 
country is waiting. I ask FEMA to not allow for any other delays, and I 
yield back the balance of my time.

                          ____________________