Formatting necessary for an accurate reading of this text may be shown by tags (e.g., <DELETED> or <BOLD>) or may be missing from this TXT display. For complete and accurate display of this text, see the PDF.
[Pages H363-H364]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
HOW CLOTURE KILLED THE 115TH CONGRESS
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from
California (Mr. McClintock) for 5 minutes.
Mr. McCLINTOCK. Mr. Speaker, 2 weeks after the 2016 election, I
warned on this floor that the greatest obstacle to the success of the
Republican Congress and the Trump Presidency was the Senate's cloture
rule.
Cloture is the Senate rule that requires 60 votes before a bill can
be considered. It was originally designed to protect the minority's
right to debate, but it has now degenerated into a very effective way
for the minority to prevent any debate. Today, it gives minority
Democrats in the Senate the power to summarily reject almost every
measure brought to the Senate.
In 2016, the American people elected a Republican President and
Republican majorities in both houses of Congress with a simple plea:
Make America Great Again. As a practical matter, this meant reviving
the economy, balancing the budget, securing our borders, and rescuing
our healthcare system. Having given us all the necessary tools, it had
every right to expect action.
If the Republican Congress had proven worthy of this trust, history
would have looked back on the last 2 years as the turning point when
America reclaimed its greatness and entered a new era of prosperity,
solvency, and security. The new 116th Congress would be taking office
with a clear mandate to build on that success.
Well, the American people got action from the President. They also
got action from this House. We sent the Senate over 1,300 bills,
fulfilling every promise made to the American people. The Senate acted
on fewer than 300.
Now, did the Senate, which absurdly boasts to be the greatest
deliberative body in the world, carefully and meticulously deliberate
over these measures and ultimately reject them? No. The greatest
deliberative body in the world never took them up at all--all for lack
of cloture.
That is not the fault of Senate Democrats, who radically abused this
rule as part of the resistance. It is the fault of Senate Republicans
who let them.
The only major accomplishments were due to rare instances when
cloture could be bypassed. The appointments of Neil Gorsuch and Brett
Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court occurred only after Senate Republicans
changed this rule, but only for Supreme Court nominations.
The landmark tax reform bill could be taken up and passed in the
Senate only by misusing a budget process called reconciliation, which
avoids the cloture rule.
Reconciliation is a once-a-year bill designed to control spending. It
isn't subject to the 60-vote requirement, but it can only change laws
to conform to spending levels set by the budget.
Even then, this proved a mixed political blessing for Republicans.
The limits on deducting State and local taxes were all placed in the
bill, solely to conform to reconciliation requirements. Republicans got
clobbered in the high-tax States where these provisions proved so
unpopular.
The tax cuts triggered such dramatic economic growth that Federal
revenues increased, yet the deficit continued to widen. Why? Well,
spending exploded, in part because House leaders hijacked
reconciliation, the most potent tool to control spending, in order to
get around the Senate's cloture rule.
Cloture turned healthcare from a winning to a losing issue for
Republicans. House Republicans had proposed comprehensive healthcare
reforms that rescued Americans from the bureaucratic labyrinth of
ObamaCare, restored their freedom of choice, protected those with
preexisting conditions, and provided a supportive tax system to
guarantee an affordable health plan for every family.
Yet cloture made a comprehensive bill DOA in the Senate, forcing the
House to concoct a hodgepodge measure that could fit within the narrow
rules for budget reconciliation. This mangled product that resulted
couldn't even muster a Senate majority. Since the replacement bill was
never enacted, Democrats could portray it any way they wanted. The same
story can be told of border security and funding for the long-promised
border wall.
[[Page H364]]
Though majorities in both houses favored funding, cloture gave Senate
Democrats the power to run out the clock toward a government shutdown
and produce the impasse that we now face today.
Ironically, the political demographics of Senate elections allowed
Senate Republicans to increase their majority, while voter frustration
decimated their House colleagues.
The 115th Congress now passes into history as Democrats take control
of the House and end any chance to fulfill the hopes of 2016. All that
is left is Whittier's sad lament: ``Of all sad words of tongue and pen,
the saddest are these, `It might have been.' ''
____________________