INTRODUCTION OF JOHN TANNER FAIRNESS AND INDEPENDENCE IN REDISTRICTING ACT; Congressional Record Vol. 165, No. 1
(Extensions of Remarks - January 03, 2019)

Text available as:

Formatting necessary for an accurate reading of this text may be shown by tags (e.g., <DELETED> or <BOLD>) or may be missing from this TXT display. For complete and accurate display of this text, see the PDF.


[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E6-E7]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




INTRODUCTION OF JOHN TANNER FAIRNESS AND INDEPENDENCE IN REDISTRICTING 
                                  ACT

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. STEVE COHEN

                              of tennessee

                    in the house of representatives

                       Thursday, January 3, 2019

  Mr. COHEN. Madam Speaker, I rise in support of the John Tanner 
Fairness and Independence in Redistricting Act, a bill I introduced 
today.
  In most states, districts are drawn by the state legislature, and as 
a result, whichever party controls the state legislature ends up 
drawing Congressional districts specifically designed to maximize the 
number of Congressional seats that party can win.
  In other words, the elected officials choose the voters, instead of 
the voters choosing the elected officials.
  If enacted, the John Tanner Fairness and Independence in 
Redistricting Act would fix this by requiring states to use bipartisan 
redistricting commissions to draw maps. No single party would get to 
control the process.
  Historically, both parties have engaged in gerrymandering to some 
extent or another. But that does not make it right.
  In a representative democracy, the people need be able to freely and 
fairly choose their elected representatives.
  Unfortunately, that is not always happening.
  This is not what the Founders envisioned. They designed the House of 
Representatives to be the Congressional chamber that most accurately 
reflects the views of the people.
  The failure of the House to more accurately reflect the will of the 
electorate is a formula for the electorate to lose faith in the 
institution. It makes people cynical and discourages them from 
participating.
  We can do better.
  A democracy is supposed to be marketplace of ideas. The playing field 
is supposed to be fair and competitive, not gerrymandered and 
monopolized.

[[Page E7]]

  I urge my, colleagues to pass this bill, and help restore some much 
needed faith in Congress.

                          ____________________