BUDGETARY EFFECTS OF PAYGO LEGISLATION; Congressional Record Vol. 165, No. 167
(House of Representatives - October 22, 2019)

Text available as:

Formatting necessary for an accurate reading of this text may be shown by tags (e.g., <DELETED> or <BOLD>) or may be missing from this TXT display. For complete and accurate display of this text, see the PDF.


[Page H8384]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                 BUDGETARY EFFECTS OF PAYGO LEGISLATION

  Pursuant to the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 (PAYGO), Mr. 
Yarmuth hereby submits, prior to the vote on passage, for printing in 
the Congressional Record, that H.R. 598, the Georgia Support Act, as 
amended, would have no significant effect on the deficit, and 
therefore, the budgetary effects of such bill are estimated as zero.
                                  ____

  Pursuant to the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 (PAYGO), Mr. 
Yarmuth hereby submits, prior to the vote on passage, for printing in 
the Congressional Record, that H.R. 724, the PACT Act, as amended, 
would have no significant effect on the deficit, and therefore, the 
budgetary effects of such bill are estimated as zero.
                                  ____

  Pursuant to the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 (PAYGO), Mr. 
Yarmuth hereby submits, prior to the vote on passage, for printing in 
the Congressional Record, that H.R. 835, the Rodchenkov Anti-Doping Act 
of 2019, as amended, would have no significant effect on the deficit, 
and therefore, the budgetary effects of such bill are estimated as 
zero.

                          ____________________