December 10, 2019 - Issue: Vol. 165, No. 197 — Daily Edition116th Congress (2019 - 2020) - 1st Session
All in Senate sectionPrev36 of 51Next
STATEMENTS ON INTRODUCED BILLS AND JOINT RESOLUTION; Congressional Record Vol. 165, No. 197
(Senate - December 10, 2019)
Text available as:
Formatting necessary for an accurate reading of this text may be shown by tags (e.g., <DELETED> or <BOLD>) or may be missing from this TXT display. For complete and accurate display of this text, see the PDF.
[Pages S6952-S6953] From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] STATEMENTS ON INTRODUCED BILLS AND JOINT RESOLUTION By Mr. LANKFORD (for himself, Ms. Hassan, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Johnson, Mr. King, and Mr. Kaine): S. 3009. A bill to provide for a period of continuing appropriations in the event of a lapse in appropriations under the normal appropriations process, and establish procedures and consequences in the event of a failure to enact appropriations; read the first time. Mr. LANKFORD. Mr. President, 2019 is almost over, but there is a lot that still has to be done on this floor. A lot of bills have moved through this year. In fact, we have had 78 bills that have been signed into law so far this year. This year, as we worked through the process, we have had quite a few judges and nominations that the Senate has actually worked through. In fact, by the end of this week, we will have confirmed our 50th circuit court judge. There is a lot of engagement, but with a week and a half left on this floor, we still have issues like the United States-Mexico-Canada Trade Agreement. That agreement, which is called the USMCA, has been sitting over in the House for 14 months. It looks like the House is now going to take it up this week or next week after 14 months of its being there. We are pleased to see some movement there. We have to see the final implementing language on that. We hope to move the national defense authorization bill. That has been waiting for months and months and months under the capable leadership of Senator Inhofe, who is trying to negotiate with the House to get that done. Hopefully that will get done either this week or next week, but it is cramming into the end of the year. We have 12 appropriations bills that are still unfinished, and we face a deadline of December 20, or we will run into another government shutdown, which brings me to a bill that Senator Hassan and I are dropping today, something we have negotiated for months across party lines to be able to have a nonpartisan solution to how we can never ever again discuss government shutdowns. This past week when I was flying back to DC from home, on the plane as I was coming up, there was a Federal employee who caught me in the aisle of the plane and said: Hey, I hear you are working on stopping government shutdowns. Thank you. Her next comment surprised me, though. She said she has worked for a Federal agency for years, but she is retiring in January because she is so tired of constantly having to prepare for, get set for a government shutdown that may be pending in the days ahead. It has worn her out. Someone who has great wisdom and experience and is serving in one of our Federal agencies is retiring in January, and we will lose those years of experience because she is tired of dealing with shutdowns. I don't blame her, quite frankly, although I wish she wouldn't leave. I don't blame her because year after year we end up in this same conversation: Are we going to have another shutdown? It seems like every year, as we approach Christmas, Federal families across the country wonder if they are about to be furloughed and won't get a check soon. Federal agency leaders--those who are Senate confirmed all the way through the process of leadership--aren't spending their time on vision-setting and on oversight; they are spending their time in their office having to figure out what to do in case there is a government shutdown or working through the process of a continuing resolution because they only get funding a few days at a time. All of us know this is bad, but for years, we have discussed ending government shutdowns but have never done it. Senator Hassan and I have put together a nonpartisan bill that is a very straightforward approach that we bring to this body and to the House to say: Let's take government shutdowns off the table forever. Let's make this so that in the decades ahead, we will talk about the way back days long ago when we used to have government shutdowns. In this body now, we have had 21 government shutdowns in the last 40 years. Let's talk about the days that used to happen but never happens again. We have a very straightforward, simple solution. Our simple solution is, if we get to the end of the funding cycle--at this point, it would be December 20--we will have an automatic continuing resolution that kicks in so that Federal families don't feel the effect of that across the country. They are not on furlough, but Members of Congress and our staff work 7 days a week. We have session here 7 days a week, and we can't move to bills other than appropriations for 30 days so that we are locked into settling the appropriations issue. The simple resolution is, if we get to the end of the fiscal year and our work is not done, we keep working until it is done. It is not that hard, but we have never made the commitment to each other that we will stay here and continue to work until it is done. What we have done instead is one of two things. We just punt a CR, a continuing resolution, for months at a time and say ``OK. Let's get back to this in 8 [[Page S6953]] weeks,'' which is what we did before, and then before that, there was a 4-week continuing resolution. So we just punt it out and say, ``We will keep going, and we will try to figure this out later,'' which puts a lot of chaos in agencies, or we do a government shutdown while we argue. We go home, and Federal workers are on furlough. Let's commit to each other that we will never do that again. We will never put Federal workers on furlough because we can't resolve our differences. Let's also commit to each other that when we get to the end of the fiscal year, we will resolve the problem right then. There is nothing different this week than there was 7 weeks ago when we first started a continuing resolution. There is nothing different about it other than we have just decided to go ahead and get it resolved. When we get to the end of the problem, this Congress needs a deadline to resolve it. Let's make it, and let's make it very simple and straightforward: We will stay at it until we solve it--that is our commitment--and we will hold Federal workers harmless through that process. Senator Hassan and I have worked on this for months. We have three Republicans and three Democrats as we are putting this in front of this body today. We have multiple folks who have already contacted us and said they want to be added as cosponsors as soon as we drop it. Well, today is the day we have introduced that bill, and we would welcome any of the 100 of us to join us in a nonpartisan bill to end government shutdowns forever. Let's keep working until we solve the problem. ____________________
All in Senate sectionPrev36 of 51Next