Formatting necessary for an accurate reading of this text may be shown by tags (e.g., <DELETED> or <BOLD>) or may be missing from this TXT display. For complete and accurate display of this text, see the PDF.
[Page S1893]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
S.J. RES. 7
Mr. MENENDEZ. Mr. President, I rise to express a concern over the
Rubio amendment to the Sanders-Lee joint resolution, S.J. Res. 7, which
was passed by voice vote in yesterday's debate.
The Rubio amendment attempts to make clear that nothing in the joint
resolution is intended or may be interpreted to affect any intelligence
or counterintelligence activity or investigations relating to threats
in or from Yemen, which involves the collection, analysis, or sharing
of intelligence with any coalition partner.
I do not believe that it was the intention of the authors of S.J.
Res. 7 to restrict these intelligence activities per se. I believe it
was Senator Rubio's intention to make sure that that legitimate
intelligence activities, as specified, were not affected.
However, my concern springs from the full implications of what
``sharing intelligence'' means. I assume it is meant to share useful
intelligence the United States may acquire about the intentions,
activities, characteristics, and other information about, for example,
the Houthis or Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. That is entirely
appropriate.
But if the intelligence being shared is actually information that
allows Saudi Arabia or other members of the Saudi-led coalition to
specifically target and conduct military operations, such as
airstrikes, against specific sites in Yemen, then that would get
perilously close to the U.S. being directly involved in hostilities in
Yemen, including under the War Powers Resolution.
Section 8 of the War Powers Resolution considers U.S. Armed Forces to
be ``introduced into hostilities'' if, among other activities, members
of the U.S. Armed Forces ``coordinate'' the activities of foreign
forces. Arguably, enabling Saudi forces to target specific sites in
Yemen could constitute ``coordination'' under the War Powers
definition.
Why is this important? It is important, first, to preserve the scope
of application of the War Powers Resolution, which the Congress enacted
to rein in the power of the executive branch to make war anywhere under
any circumstances.
Second, the more direct assistance U.S. Armed Forces provide to the
Saudi-led coalition, the closer they are associated with the actions of
those countries. That could lead to shared liability in those
activities if and when those activities lead, inadvertently or
otherwise, to atrocities on the ground in Yemen.
Again, I do not believe that it was the intention of the author of
this amendment to create the legal space for this to occur. I would
advise the Department of Defense and the appropriate intelligence
agencies to be mindful of this issue and be cautious about what
intelligence information is shared and for what purposes it is used.
____________________