Formatting necessary for an accurate reading of this text may be shown by tags (e.g., <DELETED> or <BOLD>) or may be missing from this TXT display. For complete and accurate display of this text, see the PDF.
[Page S2536]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Climate Change
Mr. President, finally, on climate change, over the past few months,
I have been asking Leader McConnell and my Republican colleagues three
simple questions on climate: Do they agree that climate change is real;
do they believe it is caused by humans; and do they believe we should
take significant action? It seems that after repeating those questions
over and over again, we have finally gotten some results.
Yesterday the New York Times said in an article that some Senate
Republicans, ``in a switch,'' are starting to cite climate change as
the reason for some of their policy suggestions, be they support
nuclear energy or carbon capture research. That is a first.
The fact that we have been asking our Republican colleagues the
question: Do you believe in climate change, and now the fact that they
feel compelled to say yes, even though we don't agree with their
solutions--which we may not--is progress. It is not enough progress,
given that the globe is at stake, but at least it is a step forward,
and we haven't seen any steps come out of our Republican friends in a
long time.
Hopefully, our Republican friends are finally coming around to
realizing that climate change is real and caused by humans. Maybe they
are looking at poll numbers and realizing that calling climate change a
hoax looks as crazy as it sounds. Maybe they are seeing the changes in
their own States with the climate. Whatever the reason, it is at least
a little bit of progress--and we will have to take whatever little bit
we can get from our normally intransigent Republican friends on this
issue--and we welcome it.
That said, the types of policies my Republican colleagues talk about
when they talk about climate do a disservice to the term ``low-hanging
fruit.'' Of course, I welcome smart and sensible solutions from
anywhere in this Chamber, but there is a difference between getting
serious on climate change and just mouthing the words or coming up with
solutions that don't really solve the problem.
Some of my colleagues have called for funding for more research on
carbon capture, and that is a good idea. It should be part of any plan,
but in the face of an existential threat of our time, if they support
carbon capture but don't go bigger, don't advocate more solutions than
that, they are not doing close to enough of what we need. We must go
bolder. We must grapple with the central challenge--reducing carbon
emissions as quickly as possible. The good news is, we can do that with
affordable and reliable technologies that exist today.
We have waited far too long to address the climate crisis in a
serious way. We now need to act in a way that matches the urgency and
scale of this challenge. My Republican colleagues on the other side of
the aisle mocked the Green New Deal, but the growing youth movement
leading the fight for the Green New Deal understands something that I
think most Americans do: We must think big, bold, and fast, and that we
can create jobs and economic opportunity for working families in this
transition. We welcome the glimmer, the little, small green sprouts of
progress, whatever we can get.
Our Republican friends are starting to answer our pointed questions
on climate change, but now the next step is, they have to think bigger
and talk to the leader about pursuing real legislation instead of just
partisan stunts.
I yield the floor.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The clerk will call the roll.
The senior assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Cassidy). The Senator from Oklahoma.
Mr. LANKFORD. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.