Formatting necessary for an accurate reading of this text may be shown by tags (e.g., <DELETED> or <BOLD>) or may be missing from this TXT display. For complete and accurate display of this text, see the PDF.
[Page S2712]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
Nomination of Janet Dhillon
Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, the Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission is charged with protecting workers and job applicants
against discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, national
origin, age, disability, or genetic information.
Janet Dhillon, the latest nominee to be a member of that board, has
spent her career, unfortunately, doing the opposite. She has spent
years advocating for corporations over workers and has a track record
that puts her in direct opposition to the mission of the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission. For example, under Ms. Dhillon's
leadership, the Retail Litigation Center filed briefs in support of
policies making it more difficult for employers to be held liable for
harassment.
I am also concerned that Ms. Dhillon has declined to answer whether
she would uphold the EEOC's current position that the Civil Rights Act
forbids employment discrimination on the basis of gender identity or
sexual orientation. The EEOC is considering issues that are critical to
protecting workers, including ongoing court cases to protect LGBTQ
workers from discrimination and improve pay data collection for women
in the workforce. Women, on average, make 80 cents per every dollar
earned by a man. The gap is even higher for women of color. We need
Commissioners at the EEOC who will fight to close this gap.
No matter your age, race, occupation, religion, or sexuality, you
should be treated with dignity, and for too long, with too many people,
this has not been the case. Ms. Dhillon has not demonstrated that she
will be a champion for these workers.
In the past, we have always tried to move EEOC nominations in a
bipartisan way, with Democratic and Republican nominees confirmed at
the same time, but for months, for reasons I cannot explain, my
Republican colleagues have refused to hold a vote on a Democratic
nominee to this Commission. This obstruction has forced the EEOC to
operate without a quorum, preventing it from conducting crucial
business, such as issuing new policies, guidance, and regulations.
This is another example of Republicans changing Senate norms and
traditions when it comes to their quest for nominations. We are also
seeing that this week with votes on two Second Circuit nominees from
New York who are being pushed through over objections by both home
State Senators. Before this year, we had never, never seen a judicial
nominee receive a vote without a positive blue slip from either home
State Senator.
``Blue slip'' is just a formal term; it is actually an approval by
the Senator of a nomination.
By the end of this week, it will have happened four times--in the
State of Washington, New Jersey, and now New York. This is a terrible
precedent that could end up affecting each of our States.
Republicans appear determined to ignore traditions and common sense
in their effort to confirm the highest possible volume of President
Trump's extreme nominees. I continue to call on my colleagues to change
course. I think it is a mistake.
I oppose Janet Dhillon's nomination as Chairman of the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission.