Formatting necessary for an accurate reading of this text may be shown by tags (e.g., <DELETED> or <BOLD>) or may be missing from this TXT display. For complete and accurate display of this text, see the PDF.
[Pages S3223-S3224]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
BORDER SECURITY
Mr. McCONNELL. Madam President, on another matter, in addition to
nominations, there are a number of other important items that Congress
ought to be able to tackle in the next several weeks. As I have
mentioned several times, we need continued negotiations in the Senate,
the House, and the White House toward a bipartisan government funding
agreement to set up the appropriations process. We will also need to
complete a National Defense Authorization Act to address critical
national security challenges, rebuild our military's readiness, and
modernize our Armed Forces to address the growing challenges posed by
great-power competitors like Russia and China.
The headlines remain filled with the unacceptable, unsustainable
security crisis and humanitarian crisis down on our southern border. By
now, I am confident that every Member of Congress has heard the
breathtaking numbers. We have all heard the chaos analyzed 1,000
different ways.
[[Page S3224]]
What we haven't seen is any appetite on the Democratic side for
actually getting an outcome. We haven't seen the Democrats put aside
their reflexive opposition to anything--anything--the President
requests and face the facts.
So allow me to repeat some of those facts yet again. We are all
hoping they will sink in some time soon. One week ago this morning,
border agents encountered the largest group of people attempting an
illegal crossing that they have ever, ever seen. They apprehended more
than 1,000 individuals--the largest group ever.
For consecutive months now, the men and women who guard our border
have apprehended more than 100,000 people--100,000. That is each
month--100,000 a month. We are talking about numbers not seen for more
than a decade. And, as we all know, in particular, the amount of
families and children are consistently record-breaking as well.
The officials whom we trust to protect our borders--not to mention
feed, clothe, and house these individuals--have been crying out for
months that their Agencies are stretched literally to the breaking
point. One processing center that was designed to hold 125 is said to
hold 900--900. The Director of the Office of Refugee Resettlement has
predicted that the program for unaccompanied children may exhaust all
of its funding this month--this month--and need to reduce operations.
Here is one newspaper reporting on testimony from the head of the
Border Patrol:
The flood of migrants has overwhelmed Border Patrol
stations and other Federal facilities, forcing immigration
agents to release migrants directly into U.S. border
communities with only the hope that they will appear for
their immigration court hearings.
So this funding crisis is directly weakening our border security and
national security. It is directly worsening the conditions for these
men, women, and children, and the authorities are pleading for our
help.
I dare say there are not many occasions when the editorial board of
the New York Times has chosen to side with the Trump administration,
but this crisis is so bad and the next step is so obvious that it has
united President Trump, Republicans here in Congress, and the New York
Times editorial page. I doubt if we will see that again.
Here was the title of their editorial about a month ago: ``Congress,
Give Trump His Border Money.'' They described:
A humanitarian crisis of overcrowding, disease, and chaos.
. . . As resources are strained and the system buckles, the
misery grows.
They published that editorial while we were finalizing the disaster
funding legislation. There was no reason why the funds to alleviate the
humanitarian crisis at the border should not have been included in that
bill, and yet my friend, the Democratic leader, came to the floor
multiple times late last month to call the issue of border funding
``extraneous.''
Addressing the security crisis and humanitarian crisis is not
extraneous. It is essential. Migrants are experiencing overcrowded and
underequipped facilities. Our law enforcement humanitarian
professionals are crying out for help.
Look, I understand our Democratic colleagues find it extremely
difficult to put partisanship aside and work with the President the
American people elected. I think the whole country sees very clearly
that Democrats in Congress seem to prefer picking fights with this
President to actually getting much done. Their partisan spite must not
prolong this misery any longer. As long as Democrats continue to drag
their feet on this crisis, as long as they keep slow-walking funding
that everyone from President Trump to the New York Times sees is
necessary, then, my colleagues across the aisle will continue to own
the consequences. It is on them.
I hope my Democratic colleagues will allow this legislation to move
forward--no more poison-pill policy riders, no more political
posturing. It is way past time for action.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. MURPHY. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for
the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Cramer). Without objection, it is so
ordered.
____________________