September 19, 2019 - Issue: Vol. 165, No. 151 — Daily Edition116th Congress (2019 - 2020) - 1st Session
All in House sectionPrev7 of 108Next
WHAT IS GOING ON IN THIS COUNTRY; Congressional Record Vol. 165, No. 151
(House of Representatives - September 19, 2019)
Text available as:
Formatting necessary for an accurate reading of this text may be shown by tags (e.g., <DELETED> or <BOLD>) or may be missing from this TXT display. For complete and accurate display of this text, see the PDF.
[Page H7778] From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] WHAT IS GOING ON IN THIS COUNTRY The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Iowa (Mr. King) for 5 minutes. Mr. KING of Iowa. Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the privilege of being recognized here to speak on the floor of the United States House of Representatives. I come to the floor this morning, Mr. Speaker, to address a topic, and most of the words that I say will be from an article written by Roger Scruton, who is an author from Great Britain. He is commenting on a new book by Douglas Murray, titled ``The Madness of Crowds: Gender, Race and Identity.'' Some of this hits home so much, and it has so much to do with America, that I thought it was important I address this here this morning. He says: ``In every period of history, therefore, there have been opinions and customs that are dangerous to question . . . but our situation in Western democracies today is a novel one. . . . The old customs have been torn asunder by a culture of repudiation, which encourages people to shape their lives according to an `identity' of their own.'' Socialization no longer means what it used to mean. It means now becoming who you are without regard to the framework that existed in the civilization and the culture prior. ``The punishments for saying, thinking, or implying the wrong thing . . . are real, serious, and largely impossible to deflect.'' That means that ``the archive of your crimes is stored in cyberspace, and however much you may have confessed to them and sworn to change, they will pursue you for the rest of your life, just as long as someone has an interest in drawing attention to them. And when the mob turns on you, it is with a pitiless intensity that bears no relation to the objective seriousness of your fault. A word out of place, a hasty judgment, a slip of the tongue, whatever the fault might be, it is sufficient, once picked upon, to put you beyond the pale of human sympathy.'' This is reflected in the book ``The Madness of Crowds.'' ``The emerging world of censorship is a world without forgiveness . . . in which the real virtues and vices that govern our conduct are ignored altogether'' or are decided to be irrelevant. ``The crimes for which we are judged are existential crimes. Through speaking in the wrong way, you display one of the phobias or isms,'' or they presume that is the case, ``that show you to be beyond acceptable humanity. You are a homophobe, an Islamophobe, a white supremacist, or a racist, and no argument can refute these accusations once they have been made.'' Even ``your accusers are not interested in your deeds; they are interested in you,'' and what they are interested in is ``whether or not you are `one of us,' '' meaning actually one of them. ``Your faults cannot be overcome by voluntary action, since they adhere to the kind of thing that you are, and you reveal what you are in the words that define you,'' as defined by your critics. ``These words may be taken out of context, even doctored to mean the opposite of what you said''--that is true with the author and certainly true with me--``but this will not affect the verdict, since there is no objective trial, no `case for the defense,' no due process. You are accused by the mob, examined by the mob, and condemned by the mob, and if you have brought this on yourself, then,'' they say, ``you have only yourself to blame. For the mob is by nature innocent. It washes its own conscience in a flow of collective indignation, and by joining it, you make yourself safe,'' which is one of the reasons we see an epidemic of virtue signaling here in this Congress, Mr. Speaker. ``The spirit of the mob has entered not only the language of public debate but also the sources of information and the institutions of decisionmaking. Censorship begins in the media themselves.'' Cyberspace is censored and is controlled by about four major companies. George Orwell predicted this, but I think it has eclipsed even his magnificent imagination and the reality that we are dealing with today. ``Murray gives riveting examples of the way in which''--I will use this example--``whiteness has become a moral fault in the eyes of identity warriors on the American campus.'' They now openly ``condemn people for the color of their skin,'' provided that it is white. The art of taking offense, ``whole sections of the university curriculum are devoted to explaining to students that words, arguments, comparisons, even questions,'' rhetorical or not, ``are `offensive,' regardless of the intention with which they are used,'' or, actually, the language, the precise definition of the language. ``Invariably, the offense is given by the old majority culture and is taken on behalf of some privileged minority.'' Mr. Speaker, this is a shorthand version of what is going on in this country, what is going on in this Congress, what is going on in the media. And I submit this, that we don't any longer have an objective news media. That center that used to be the truth has been completely, almost completely, vacated. Much of it has gone to the left. Some has gone to the right. And that peace of being able to pick up a newspaper and read it and believe that it is true today is no longer true today. And the American civilization must come to grips with this and go to original sources, come to our own conclusions, adjust our civilization and our culture. If we fail to do so, we will be pitted against each other for a long time to come. ____________________
All in House sectionPrev7 of 108Next