SUPPORT FOR AMERICAN VICTIMS OF TERRORISM; Congressional Record Vol. 166, No. 18
(Senate - January 28, 2020)

Text available as:

Formatting necessary for an accurate reading of this text may be shown by tags (e.g., <DELETED> or <BOLD>) or may be missing from this TXT display. For complete and accurate display of this text, see the PDF.


[Page S627]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




               SUPPORT FOR AMERICAN VICTIMS OF TERRORISM

  Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, this past December, H.R. 1865, the Further 
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020, was enacted into law as Public 
Law 116-94. I want to take a moment to offer some clarity regarding 
section 903 of division J of the Act, which is a modified version of 
the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act of 
2019.
  I commend the Republican and Democratic Senators who have dedicated 
their time to pursuing justice for American victims of terrorism. We 
all want these victims to have their day in court and to be 
appropriately compensated. It is also important that we do so in a 
manner that does not do more harm than good. That is the balance that 
was sought in section 903 on a bipartisan basis.
  One component of section 903 is a provision that enables the 
Palestinian Authority and the Palestinian Liberation Organization, PA 
and PLO, to conduct certain activities in the United States 
``exclusively for the purpose of conducting official business'' and 
activities ``ancillary'' to those listed in the provision without 
consenting to personal jurisdiction in civil cases. The provision was 
included because Senators of both parties understand that it is in our 
national interest to permit certain activities related to the official 
representation of the PA and PLO. Having been part of the negotiation 
that resulted in this language, I believe it is important that we have 
a clear understanding of the types of activities that are considered 
``ancillary'' to the conduct of official business.
  While the official business of any foreign mission necessarily 
includes meetings with Members of Congress and their staff, 
representatives of the executive branch, and other public officials, 
ancillary activities are those which may not be essential for the 
minimal functioning of the mission but which support the mission's 
primary operations. By way of example, I am confident that every Member 
of this body would, as I do, consider a public statement, the issuance 
of a press release, or a meeting or public appearance--while not 
essential--to be ancillary to his or her primary functions as a U.S. 
Senator and would reject any attempt to define such activities 
otherwise.
  That is also why, with regard to the PA and PLO, while we may or may 
not agree with the statements of its representatives, the law 
contemplates that its representatives may meet with advocates regarding 
relevant issues, make public statements, and otherwise engage in public 
advocacy and civil society activities that are ancillary to the conduct 
of official business without consenting to personal jurisdiction. Such 
jurisdiction is provided for elsewhere in section 903.
  The message in this bill is clear: Congress is committed to pursuing 
justice for American victims of terrorism while ensuring appropriate 
standards regarding the ability of foreign missions to conduct official 
business in the United States. This is a solution that protects U.S. 
national interests, and I thank the Senators on both sides of the aisle 
who have worked together to find a way forward on this measure.

                          ____________________