Formatting necessary for an accurate reading of this text may be shown by tags (e.g., <DELETED> or <BOLD>) or may be missing from this TXT display. For complete and accurate display of this text, see the PDF.
[Page S64]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
IMPEACHMENT
Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President, I do need to say a few words about the
other serious matter occupying the Congress.
Late last year, Speaker Pelosi and House Democrats sped through a
slapdash impeachment of President Trump in 12 weeks because they
insisted the need to undo the 2016 election was urgent--urgent, they
said.
Since then, the same people have spent 3 weeks dragging their heels
and refusing to proceed to a Senate trial. Supposedly, the explanation
for this shameless game playing is that Speaker Pelosi wanted
leverage--leverage--to reach into the Senate and dictate our trial
proceedings to us.
I have made clear from the beginning that no such leverage exists. It
is nonexistent. Yesterday, we made it clear it will never exist. A
majority of the Senate has decided that the first phase of an
impeachment trial should track closely with the unanimous bipartisan
precedent that all 100 Senators supported for the first phase of the
Clinton trial back in 1999. There will be no haggling with the House
over Senate procedure. We will not cede our authority to try this
impeachment. The House Democrats' turn is over. The Senate has made its
decision.
The 1999 precedent does not guarantee witnesses or foreclose
witnesses. Let me say that again. It neither guarantees witnesses nor
forecloses witnesses. It leaves those determinations until later in the
trial, where they belong. I fully expect the parties will raise
questions of witnesses at the appropriate time.
I would remind my friends on the other side that I strongly suspect
that not all of the potential witnesses would be people the Democrats
are eager to hear from. The Senate will address all of these questions
at the appropriate time, and that is for the Senate and the Senate only
to decide, period.
Now even fellow Democrats are expressing public concern over the
Speaker's endless appetite for these cynical games. Here is what the
senior Senator from Connecticut told the press yesterday. He said: ``I
think the time has passed. She should send the articles over.'' And the
senior Senator from West Virginia said: ``I think it needs to start; I
really do.'' And the junior Senator from Maine said: ``I think it is
time for the Speaker to send the articles over.''
My Democratic friends are losing patience, just as the American
people are losing patience. The country knows this absurdity should not
go on. So what do the American people say?
A recent Harvard-Harris poll found that 58 percent of Americans
believe Speaker Pelosi should send the articles to the Senate, not
continue holding them up. Let me say that again. This is a Harvard
poll. It found that 58 percent of Americans believe Speaker Pelosi
should send the articles to the Senate, not continue holding them up.
In the same survey, 77 percent believe Democrats need to accept the
same structure as the Clinton trial rather than hold out for special
new rules. So we are beginning to hear from the American people how
they view this standoff.
We all know that Senators have a diversity of opinions about
President Trump, about the House inquiry, and about the optimal
structure for a trial. But notwithstanding all of this, no Senator--no
Senator--should want the House of Representatives to steamroll
institutional norms and dictate our business to us.
Haven't enough toxic new precedents been set in recent months? Hasn't
the House broken enough constitutional china already?
This is not about the current Speaker and the current President. Do
my colleagues believe this is what a future Democratic President would
deserve? Do they believe it is good for the country?
There is a reason the Constitution reads the way it does. The House
has the sole power of impeachment. They have exercised it. It is the
Senate to whom the Founders gave the sole power to try all
impeachments, end of story.
Yet, even as her fellow Democrats are jumping ship, the Speaker is
trying to double down. Yesterday evening, in the midst of these deadly
serious events, Speaker Pelosi put out yet another statement saying
that she has no intention to end her political game playing. At the
very same time that a global crisis was unfolding in realtime, she
published yet another ``Dear Colleague'' letter saying that she intends
to keep our Commander in Chief in this limbo indefinitely.
I am glad Democratic Senators are losing patience with this. I would
urge my friend the Democratic leader to listen to his own Members. My
distinguished colleague from New York, as the minority leader in the
U.S. Senate, is a senior Member of an independent branch of our
bicameral legislature.
The Senate is not a creature of the House. The Democratic leader does
not need to continue to be in thrall to the Speaker. He does not need
to keep colluding with outside efforts to supplant the judgment of his
own colleagues. Stand up for the Senate. Stand up for our institutions.
Stand up for the country.
____________________