October 1, 2020 - Issue: Vol. 166, No. 171 — Daily Edition116th Congress (2019 - 2020) - 2nd Session
All in House sectionPrev62 of 125Next
EXPEDITED DELIVERY OF AIRPORT INFRASTRUCTURE ACT OF 2020; Congressional Record Vol. 166, No. 171
(House of Representatives - October 01, 2020)
Text available as:
Formatting necessary for an accurate reading of this text may be shown by tags (e.g., <DELETED> or <BOLD>) or may be missing from this TXT display. For complete and accurate display of this text, see the PDF.
[Pages H5190-H5191] From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] EXPEDITED DELIVERY OF AIRPORT INFRASTRUCTURE ACT OF 2020 Mr. CARBAJAL. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 5912) to amend title 49, United States Code, to permit the use of incentive payments to expedite certain federally financed airport development projects, as amended. The Clerk read the title of the bill. The text of the bill is as follows: H.R. 5912 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Expedited Delivery of Airport Infrastructure Act of 2020''. SEC. 2. ALLOWABLE COST STANDARDS FOR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS. (a) In General.--Section 47110(b)(1) of title 49, United States Code, is amended-- (1) by striking ``(1) if the cost necessarily'' and inserting ``(1)(A) if the cost necessarily''; (2) by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting ``; or''; and (3) by adding at the end the following: ``(B) if the cost is an incentive payment incurred in carrying out the project described [[Page H5191]] in subparagraph (A) that is to be provided to a contractor upon early completion of a project, if-- ``(i) such payment does not exceed the lesser of 5 percent of the initial construction contract amount or $1,000,000; ``(ii) the level of contractor's control of, or access to, the worksite necessary to shorten the duration of the project does not negatively impact the operation of the airport; ``(iii) the contract specifies application of the incentive structure in the event of unforeseeable, non-weather delays beyond the control of the contractor; ``(iv) nothing in any agreement with the contractor prevents the airport operator from retaining responsibility for the safety, efficiency, and capacity of the airport during the execution of the grant agreement; and ``(v) the Secretary determines that the use of an incentive payment is likely to increase airport capacity or efficiency or result in cost savings as a result of shortening the project's duration;''. (b) Technical Correction.--Section 47110(e)(7) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking ``(7) Partnership Program Airports.--'' and inserting ``(7) Partnership program airports.--''. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from California (Mr. Carbajal) and the gentlewoman from West Virginia (Mrs. Miller) each will control 20 minutes. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from California. General Leave Mr. CARBAJAL. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days within which to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material on H.R. 5912, as amended. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from California? There was no objection. Mr. CARBAJAL. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 5912, the Expedited Delivery of Airport Infrastructure Act of 2020, introduced by Representative Sam Graves, the ranking member of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. The bill incentivizes the early completion of airport projects funded by the Federal Aviation Administration's Airport Improvement Program, AIP. Although current airline passenger traffic has declined precipitously due to the coronavirus pandemic, there will come a time when domestic and global air travel will return to its prepandemic heights and continue to grow further. Airports will once again have to keep up with growing passenger demand. This legislation will help to address this future need by allowing airports to use their AIP funding to offer incentive payments to contractors for early completion of airport development projects. Importantly, H.R. 5912 includes conditions that ensure projects completed early do not have a negative impact on airport safety, efficiency, or capacity. I support this legislation and urge my colleagues to do the same. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time. Mr. GRAVES of Missouri. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 5912, the Expedited Delivery of Airport Infrastructure Act of 2020. This bill, which I am very proud to have introduced, gives airports the option to use some of their Airport Improvement Program, or AIP, money to expedite early completion of airport projects. Incentives such as these are commonly used in the surface transportation area, as encouraging early completion of road projects obviously can spare drivers additional weeks or months of congestion and sitting in traffic. An airfield is no different. Taking a runway or taxiway out of commission can impair airport efficiency and capacity, and it results in flight delays, upset travelers, you name it. Additionally, some airports, particularly in cold weather States, are racing against the clock to complete projects during a limited construction season. Even if a project is on schedule, an early winter or late spring can grind construction to a halt, costing the airport time and money. This bill is going help ensure that airports have the tools necessary to avoid these situations and get runways back into service faster. This bill allows airports to achieve cost savings. Projects completed early means a greater chance of avoiding construction price increases due to inflation. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support H.R. 5912, and I yield back the balance of my time. Mr. CARBAJAL. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this legislation, and I yield back the balance of my time. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the gentleman from California (Mr. Carbajal) that the House suspend the rules and pass the bill, H.R 5912, as amended. The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the rules were suspended and the bill, as amended, was passed. A motion to reconsider was laid on the table. ____________________
All in House sectionPrev62 of 125Next