February 25, 2020 - Issue: Vol. 166, No. 37 — Daily Edition116th Congress (2019 - 2020) - 2nd Session
All in House sectionPrev15 of 49Next
G.I. AND VETERANS EDUCATION EMPOWERMENT ACT; Congressional Record Vol. 166, No. 37
(House of Representatives - February 25, 2020)
Text available as:
Formatting necessary for an accurate reading of this text may be shown by tags (e.g., <DELETED> or <BOLD>) or may be missing from this TXT display. For complete and accurate display of this text, see the PDF.
[Pages H1175-H1176] From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] G.I. AND VETERANS EDUCATION EMPOWERMENT ACT Mr. TAKANO. Madam Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 4852) to amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to make available to veterans certain additional information about postsecondary educational institutions, and for other purposes. The Clerk read the title of the bill. The text of the bill is as follows: H.R. 4852 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``G.I. and Veterans Education Empowerment Act'' or the ``GIVE Act''. SEC. 2. INFORMATION PROVIDED BY DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS ABOUT POSTSECONDARY EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS. (a) Additional Information To Be Provided.--Subsection (c) of section 3698 of title 38, United States Code, is amended-- (1) in paragraph (1)(C)-- (A) in clause (xi), by striking ``and'' at the end; (B) in clause (xii), by striking the period and inserting a semicolon; and (C) by adding at the end the following new clauses: ``(xiii) whether the institution is listed on the College Navigator website as affiliated with a religion and, if so, which religious denomination; ``(xiv) whether the Secretary of Education or other head of a department or agency of the Federal Government has determined that the institution is a minority serving institution and, if so, which one or more types of minority serving institutions; and ``(xv) whether the institution is gender specific.''; and (2) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end the following new sentence: ``To the extent practicable, the Secretary shall ensure that such information is provided in a searchable format.''. (b) Definition.--Subsection (f) of such section is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: ``(3) The term `College Navigator website' has the meaning given that term in section 132 of the Higher Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1015a). ``(4) The term `minority serving institution' means any of the following: ``(A) A part B institution, as such term is defined in section 322(2) of the Higher Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1061(2)). [[Page H1176]] ``(B) A Hispanic-serving institution, as such term is defined in section 502(a)(5) of such Act (20 U.S.C. 1101a(5)). ``(C) A Tribal College or University, as such term is defined in section 316(b)(3) of such Act (20 U.S.C. 1059c(b)(3)). ``(D) A predominantly Black institution, as such term is defined in section 318(b)(6) of such Act (20 U.S.C. 1059e(b)(6)). ``(E) A Native American-serving, nontribal institution, as such term is defined in section 319(b)(2) of such Act (20 U.S.C. 1059f(b)(6)). ``(F) An Alaska Native-serving institution or Native Hawaiian-serving institution, as such terms are defined in section 317(b) of such Act (20 U.S.C. 1059d(b)). ``(G) An Asian American and Native American Pacific Islander-serving institution, as such term is defined in section 320(b) of such Act (20 U.S.C. 1059g(b)).''. (c) Application.--The amendments made by this section shall apply with respect to the information provided under section 3698 of title 38, United States Code, beginning on the date that is two years after the date of the enactment of this Act. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from California (Mr. Takano) and the gentleman from Tennessee (Mr. David P. Roe) each will control 20 minutes. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from California. General Leave Mr. TAKANO. Madam Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and to insert extraneous material on H.R. 4852. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from California? There was no objection. Mr. TAKANO. Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Madam Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 4852, the G.I. and Veterans Education Empowerment Act, also known as the GIVE Act. H.R. 4852, introduced by Representative Torres, provides veterans with more information about educational institutions prior to their enrollment. Too often veterans find their educational institutions are not good fits for their educational goals and drop out or transfer to other institutions after wasting time and benefits. After transferring, veterans lose credits from their transferring institutions or simply give up on acquiring a new skill set altogether because an institution does not meet their needs. Madam Speaker, the GIVE Act addresses an overlooked cause for veterans dropping out or transferring to other institutions: cultural incongruence. I have observed countless instances where veterans begin their studies only to find out that they are not comfortable on the campus of their educational institution. Congress created the GI Bill Comparison Tool to provide veterans with more information when they consider where they will pursue a postsecondary education. While the GI Bill Comparison Tool provides veterans with data on tuition and costs, accreditation, and cautionary information, there are gaps in the information regarding campus culture. For example, the GI Bill Comparison Tool does not inform a Catholic veteran, who may be interested in attending a Catholic institution, if an institution is affiliated with the Roman Catholic Church. Madam Speaker, small pieces of information like that are critical to helping veterans assimilate to life on campus. Data on campus culture are collected by the Department of Education but are not currently displayed on the GI Bill Comparison Tool website. Now, if enacted, the GIVE Act will require VA to provide prospective student veterans with information on whether an institution is minority serving, gender specific, or has a religious affiliation. Madam Speaker, this bill will simply require the GI Bill Comparison Tool to display information to help veterans choose the right school the first time. {time} 1630 This bill will also help veterans choose a campus that is aligned with their values and reduce the number of transfers due to cultural incompatibility. We owe it to our veterans to give them the most accurate and relevant information that will allow them to efficiently obtain a new skill set so they can reenter the labor force and find meaningful opportunities. Madam Speaker, I thank Representative Torres for her work on this important issue. Madam Speaker, I encourage all of my colleagues to join me in passing H.R. 4852, and I reserve the balance of my time. Mr. DAVID P. ROE of Tennessee. Madam Speaker, I yield myself as much time as I may consume. Madam Speaker, today, I rise in support of H.R. 4852, the G.I. and Veterans Education Empowerment, or GIVE, Act. This bill would require the Department of Veterans Affairs to provide additional information on schools listed on the GI Bill Comparison Tool. The tool was first authorized by legislation sponsored by Congressman Gus Bilirakis from Florida, the ranking member of the Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity, in 2013 to give servicemembers and veterans the opportunity to compare information on GI Bill-eligible schools to determine which school is right for them. The tool is modeled off the Department of Education's College Navigator website, which contains information about tuition and fee costs, policies on transferring credits, and whether an institution is private, nonprofit, or public. H.R. 4852 would add three additional data points to the tool to ensure that it captures information about whether an institution is affiliated with a religion, serves a specific group of minorities, or is gender-specific. As the old saying goes, information is power. I am sure that this additional information will help GI Bill users choose the right school to fit their specific needs and, ultimately, ensure their success in higher education and beyond. Madam Speaker, I thank Congresswoman Norma Torres from California for her work on this legislation, and I urge all of my colleagues to support it. Madam Speaker, having used the GI Bill myself many, many years ago, it is an invaluable tool for our veterans. We know that the GI Bill was really one of the major things that helped create the America we live in today, as post-World War II veterans left, came out, used the GI Bill, went to college, and really helped create this great country we live in. Two years ago, we passed a bill that would make the GI Bill forever, so that if you lose your job when you are 45 years old or 50 years old, if you are a veteran, you can go back and use that GI Bill to retrain and continue your education. This bill helps further clarify and helps veterans use that information better for themselves and their families. Madam Speaker, I strongly encourage my colleagues to support this bill, and I yield back the balance of my time. Mr. TAKANO. Madam Speaker, I again urge all of my colleagues to pass H.R. 4852. Our veterans deserve to have the most accurate information available to them as they are making their choices about the institutions where they would like to use their GI Bill. Madam Speaker, I urge all of my colleagues to support this bill, and I yield back the balance of my time. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the gentleman from California (Mr. Takano) that the House suspend the rules and pass the bill, H.R. 4852. The question was taken. The SPEAKER pro tempore. In the opinion of the Chair, two-thirds being in the affirmative, the ayes have it. Mr. TAKANO. Madam Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further proceedings on this motion will be postponed. ____________________
All in House sectionPrev15 of 49Next