Formatting necessary for an accurate reading of this text may be shown by tags (e.g., <DELETED> or <BOLD>) or may be missing from this TXT display. For complete and accurate display of this text, see the PDF.
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E500]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
WITCH HUNT IN ISRAEL
______
HON. JOE WILSON
of south carolina
in the house of representatives
Thursday, May 28, 2020
Mr. WILSON of South Carolina. Madam Speaker, just mere days after
being sworn into office for a fifth term as Prime Minister, Benjamin
Netanyahu stood in an Israeli court to stand trial in what amounts to
nothing more than a political witch hunt. Formally charged with
bribery, fraud, and breach of trust, Prime Minister has denied all
wrongdoing from the very outset and has called for an open, televised
trial so that the entire world can stand witness to the circus the
Israeli left has put together with the sole intention of humiliating
Israel's longest serving premier in the hopes that he will step down.
One of the charges in the criminal case against Prime Minister
Netanyahu, known as ``case 4000,'' alleges unsubstantiated charges. The
distinguished lawyer and Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz perhaps
described it best when he said, ``Netanyahu's trial poses great danger
to democracy and the rule of law. This is the first time in the history
of any modern country that a man is being prosecuted for trying to gain
positive media coverage.''
As we watch this farce play out, we should also remember that a
criminal trial of a sitting head of state is a situation that could
only take place in the Middle East's sole democracy. At the same time,
the partisan nature of the charges and the trial cheapen the value of
Israel's democratic and legalistic spirt. Knesset Speaker Yariv Levin
commented that ``the day of the opening of Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu's trial will be remembered as one of the low points of the
Israeli legal system.'' Levin went on to say, ``The charges against the
prime minister are unprecedented in Western democracies. Their realm,
if at all, should have been the ethical and noncriminal sphere, and
it's no wonder why the world's top jurists have been harshly
criticizing it.''
Indeed, the sham trial against Netanyahu comes at especially ironic
times as the Prime Minister won the highest number of votes of any
party since the establishment of the Israel state. This mandate from
the Israeli electorate was a personal expression of confidence in the
Prime Minister as well as a clear sign that the Israeli public has lost
all trust in a judicial system rigged along party lines to force the
hand of a popular leader and push him out of the political system.
Knesset Speaker Levin concluded his comments on the matter by saying,
``I, like millions of Israeli citizens, stand with the prime minister
today. With the truth. With justice.'' May the truth come to light and
may justice prevail.
The similarity with America is obvious that political enemies of
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu are abusing the legal system just as
the false efforts to impeach President Donald Trump were a witch hunt.
Forces who lose on issues at the ballot box seek to subvert the votes
of citizens.
____________________