June 25, 2020 - Issue: Vol. 166, No. 117 — Daily Edition116th Congress (2019 - 2020) - 2nd Session
All in Senate sectionPrev11 of 46Next
NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021--Motion to Proceed--Resumed; Congressional Record Vol. 166, No. 117
(Senate - June 25, 2020)
Text available as:
Formatting necessary for an accurate reading of this text may be shown by tags (e.g., <DELETED> or <BOLD>) or may be missing from this TXT display. For complete and accurate display of this text, see the PDF.
[Pages S3278-S3281] From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021--Motion to Proceed--Resumed The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, the Senate will resume consideration of the motion to proceed to S. 4049, which the clerk will report. The senior assistant legislative clerk read as follows: Motion to proceed to S. 4049, a bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2021 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes. Mr. McCONNELL. I suggest the absence of a quorum. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll. The senior assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll. Mr. SCHUMER. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. Recognition of the Minority Leader The Democratic leader is recognized. Justice in Policing Act Mr. SCHUMER. Madam President, the House of Representatives will pass the Justice in Policing Act today--a comprehensive, strong bill to bring lasting change to police departments across America and tackle the extremely large and difficult problem of police bias, police violence, racial bias, and the lack of transparency and accountability in law enforcement. Unlike the Republican policing bill, the Justice in Policing Act will fully ban choke holds. The Justice in Policing Act will ban no-knock warrants in Federal cases, not just study them like in the Republicans' bill. Unlike the Republicans' bill, the Justice in Policing Act will also bring sorely needed accountability to police officers who are guilty of misconduct, including qualified immunity reform, use-of-force standards, and policies to end racial profiling. My Republican colleagues should look to the House today if they want to see what a serious attempt at policing reform looks like and if they want to understand why their bill failed to earn enough votes to proceed yesterday. The Republicans' policing reform bill failed because it was not a serious enough effort at reform. The legislation itself was so threadbare, so weak, and so narrow, it could hardly be considered a constructive starting point. That is why more than 138 civil rights organizations, which want nothing [[Page S3279]] more than to see progress on these issues, strongly urged Senators to oppose the Republicans' bill. That is why the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights called the bill ``deeply problematic'' and a ``menial, incremental approach.'' That is why the lawyer representing the families of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor said he was shocked that the Republicans' bill could even be ``thought of as legislation.'' As I said the other day, I know my friend from South Carolina is trying to do the right thing, but the problem we have and the problem so many civil rights groups have is with the substance of the bill and with the way the Republican leader--Leader McConnell, who controls the floor--set up the process. The Republican majority drafted a bill on its own, and instead of putting it through committee, where members of both parties could analyze and amend it, he dropped it on the floor and dared the Democrats to block it. Let me be very clear: The debate on policing reform is only over for those who want it to be over and for, maybe, those who never truly wanted this debate in the first place, because the truth is, by the end of the day today, the House will have passed the most serious policing reform bill in decades. Here in the Senate, the Senate Democrats have been clear that we want to sit down with our colleagues and try to negotiate a bipartisan product that can go through committee and come to the floor. As I said a week ago, I know my friend from South Carolina is trying to do the right thing, but Leader McConnell decided to go about this the wrong way--the partisan way. Let's start over the right way--the bipartisan way. I have no doubt we can arrive at legislation that, unlike the bill that failed yesterday, would bring comprehensive and lasting change that protesters, civil rights organizations, and the families of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and Ahmaud Arbery demand. Coronavirus Madam President, the COVID-19 pandemic continues to spread and swell across the United States. Yesterday afternoon, the New York Times reported that new cases of COVID-19 are now at the highest levels in the United States since the month of April, as 35,000 new cases were identified on Tuesday alone--the third worst single day of the entire pandemic. Hospitalization rates in Arizona and Texas have hit daily records, and Florida is not far behind. The rise in cases, scientists warn, is not explained by the current rate of testing in this country. One of the main reasons our Nation has struggled so to contain the coronavirus is President Trump's complete mismanagement of the government's response. In the early days of the virus, the President's lack of attention led to a shortage of PPE, ventilators, and a painfully, damagingly slow ramp-up of testing Here again, 4 months into the virus, as the case numbers continue to grow in so many places, the President's lack of attention is causing a national failure to overcome the COVID-19 pandemic. The President is gallivanting from State to State and holding political rallies in two of the most affected areas. The President joked--or perhaps didn't joke--about instructing his administration to ``slow down the testing, please,'' because the number of coronavirus cases might make him look bad. Can you believe that? Again, the President urged the administration to ``slow down the testing, please,'' because the number of cases might make him look bad. Whether it was a joke or not, it is not a joking matter; it is serious stuff. Throughout this struggle with the coronavirus, the administration, at best, has been late to the debate or asleep at the switch or, at worst, has been doing things that actually harm rather than help. There were reports yesterday that the administration will, in fact, halt Federal funding for a number of community-based COVID testing sites, many of which are in Texas--a State that is getting hit hard. The administration is actually preparing to slow down the testing, amazingly enough. A lesson from so many countries is that good, strong testing and contact tracing is the key, but this President seems to be blithely dancing along, going to his little events, and not paying attention to the crisis and doing what is necessary to get a real handle on it. We are witnessing the highest number of new cases since April, and the Trump administration is cutting funding for testing in some of the worst hotspots--a terrible decision at a terrible moment but, unfortunately, not atypical of this administration's total ineptitude. To cap it all off, today the Trump administration is filing briefs in the Supreme Court in an attempt to invalidate the Nation's health law at a time when roughly 27 million Americans have lost job-based health coverage, and their only backstops are the exchanges in the healthcare law, but the administration is proposing to get rid of it. It is sort of similar to yesterday, with the nomination on the floor of somebody so anti-voting rights to go to the Fifth Circuit. A total contradiction of what they say is what they do. From the beginning, the President has downplayed the severity of the disease. He has spread misinformation about how to stay safe and put his political interests--his desire for credit and avoidance of blame-- above the medical needs and safety of the American people. As a result, President Trump has helped put America first in the number of COVID-19 cases in the world, and unfortunately the situation is not much better in the Senate. It has been 2 months since the passage of the last COVID relief legislation. The Democrats had hoped to continue the bipartisan work-- work that produced the CARES Act--in April, May, and now June but to no avail. The House passed the HEROES Act over a month ago, which includes hazard pay, housing assistance, extended unemployment insurance, and aid to State and local governments. Yet, as the pandemic continued to spread and unemployment skyrocketed, the Senate Republicans said they felt no urgency to act immediately. There have been more than 40 million unemployment claims--another 1.5 million this week alone--and still Leader McConnell and the Republican Senate don't feel an urgency to act. Leader McConnell originally said that another emergency relief bill was likely during June. Now he is saying late July. A few days ago, the Republican leader said: If there is something that's going to happen, it will emerge in the Senate; it will be written beginning in my office. Once again, Leader McConnell seems to prefer partisan pronouncements to bipartisan legislating. This is the same failed approach that delayed the CARES Act 2 months ago and that failed yesterday on policing reform. It will only delay another emergency relief bill, and such delays will be measured in hospital beds, deserted storefronts, and pink slips. There is one other point--the lack of oversight. This morning, the GAO announced that $1.4 billion in relief checks were sent to people who were dead. Where is the oversight? This is a $3 trillion package, and every small bit of oversight that the Republicans have done has had to be pushed by the Democrats. We should be having far more robust oversight over what has happened as well as moving forward on a new bill. The Democrats are not going to wait until July to bring some attention to COVID-related issues. Next week, on the floor, we will ask our colleagues to take up some important legislation on housing and rental assistance, hazard pay for essential workers, small business relief, funding to help schools open safely, and aid to State and local and Tribal governments. With cases rising in more than 20 States and with emergency unemployment insurance for American families set to expire, we cannot wait another month to act. I yield the floor I suggest the absence of a quorum. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll. The senior assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll. Mr. INHOFE. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. Mr. INHOFE. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent to be recognized for such time as I may consume. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. [[Page S3280]] S. 4049 Mr. INHOFE. Madam President, for the next week, the Senate is going to be debating what I consider to be and what I think most people consider to be the most important bill of the year--the National Defense Authorization Act. It is an act that we passed and have passed every year for 60 years. In just a few days, American families across the country will celebrate the Fourth of July, Independence Day--the day that honors our blessings of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Not all countries share these values; in fact, they reject them. China and Russia would rather have an authoritarian world, one where democracy doesn't exist, where the rest of the world yields to them. The national defense strategy is a document that I refer to all the time. It was put together a few years ago when actually 12 really expert Democrats and 12 expert Republicans came to an agreement as to what our defense should look like in the future. According to this book, China and Russia are our greatest threats right now. They are building up their militaries and expanding their influence around the world. The fiscal year 2021 National Defense Authorization Act is about sending a message to China and Russia that there is no way you can defeat us, so don't try. That is a pretty blunt message. We couldn't have sent that message 2 years ago. We have been building up, but we are still not where we should be. We know the way we preserve peace is by demonstrating our strength. We have the best military in the world, and our enemies need to know that. We can't rest on our laurels. We have to implement the national defense strategy because our comparative military advantage is at risk right now. China and Russia are actually catching up and have surpassed us in some areas. Here is one big reason: China and Russia have invested in their military. This is a shocker when you talk to people because they don't expect it. I learned many years ago--or at least I believed--that we had the best of everything ever since World War II, and it was true for a long period of time. Yet, during the period of time between 2009 and 2018, China increased its military spending by 83 percent. That is just remarkable. Russia has grown its budget by 35 percent. During that same period of time, from 2010 to 2015, for that 5-year period during the Obama administration, we reduced our military by 25 percent. Think about that. China increased theirs by 83 percent, and we reduced ours by 25 percent during that same time period. Don't forget that these countries willfully mislead on many things, including on the actual sizes of their defense budgets. Russia's is almost three times larger than most people think it is. They look at it and think, well, ours is larger than theirs. It is just that we don't get accurate information, and we know the threats that are out there. Because of these investments, China and Russia have grown not just the sizes of their militaries but their capabilities as well. Last October, China paraded a hypersonic weapon. I remember that so well because it was live on TV. I saw it on television. This was state-of- the-art for both offense and defense, and China had it. Some people said China was maybe faking it, but I believe it had it. It was in a parade, and China showed us that it had something we don't even have. We don't have it yet. Their investments aren't restricted by their borders, and I have seen their buildup, actually, across the world. One prime example is that China recently built its first overseas military base. It was in Djibouti. Now, prior to this time in Djibouti and throughout Africa, there was nothing. There was a lot of Chinese presence but not a military operation. In fact, historically, military operations from China have always started in and were evident within its own city limits. I mean, this is where China worked--not in Djibouti, not in northern Africa. In fact, I actually flew over the area. It was supposed to be a restricted area. So there is China over there in Africa, where they have never been before, and in Djibouti, and not just in Djibouti but all the way into southern Tanzania. And so that is what is going on right now. It wasn't going on before. Now we see China and Russia grow more and more aggressive and antagonistic. China, in particular, has used the pandemic to lash out in every direction. They have antagonized and harassed the Taiwanese, the Vietnamese, the Indonesian vessels in the South China Sea, and they have used every tool that they could to harass them. Do you know what they are doing in the South China Sea? And I did witness this. They did something that most people don't know is going on. China has actually built seven islands, and when you see what they have on these islands--they don't hide it--it is as if they are preparing for World War III. Now, we saw 20 Indian soldiers dead, killed by what are essentially baseball bats with spikes when the Chinese conducted a military incursion in territory claimed by China. That just happened. I called and talked to their Ambassador and gave them our condolences, but that is what China is capable of doing. Meanwhile, Russia continues to prop up the murderous Assad regime. Putin has sent mercenaries to Libya and throughout Africa. Both countries have been supporting the corrupt Maduro regime in Venezuela. We have seen warning signs of this for at least a decade. Meanwhile, the previous administration let our military advantage erode. For 8 years, we had a President for whom the military was not a top priority. I respected him because he had other areas that he thought were more significant. Of course, he was President of the United States, and he did it. But I have to remind you of what I just said a minute ago. We went down by 25 percent between the 5-year period of 2010 and 2015. At the same time, Russia was increasing by 35 percent. We were reducing 25 percent, and they were increasing. China was increasing by 83 percent. Defending America wasn't his top priority, but he was honest about it, and we learned that there were areas where we were falling behind. Now we have started turning around. Now we have a President whose priority is keeping American families secure, and over the past few years, we began rebuilding our military. Thanks to President Trump--the guy that everyone criticizes--we are restoring our military might with new planes, new ships, and new weapons. Take what we are doing at Fort Sill, as an example. Fort Sill is in my State of Oklahoma. Right now, we are outranged and outgunned by Russia and China. Fort Sill is leading the Army's modernization efforts on the long-range precision fire to restore our combat advantage. That is what is happening all over the country too. So we are pulling out of this thing. Restoring our might is important, but it is not the only thing that matters. We have to make sure that the planes, the ships, and the weapons are in the right places at the right time, and that is what the NDAA does. That is what we are talking about right now. The NDAA, as I stated before, I think is the most significant bill that we have all year round, and this will be the 60th year that we have passed it. It makes sure that we have a credible military deterrent that signals to any potential adversaries that they don't stand a chance against us. That is what we are in the process of doing. That is what this bill is all about. We introduced it and started talking about it yesterday. We probably should have this finished prior to the 4th of July recess. We should have it passed, although that may be a little bit ambitious. So we are implementing the National Defense Strategy. That is this book that we are all so proud of. It is bipartisan. It is saying what we need to do to defend America, and this document is one that we are following to the letter right now. It is our roadmap. The bill establishes the Pacific Deterrence Initiative. That is kind of patterned after the European Deterrence Initiative. It focuses resources on the Indo-Pacific, addressing key military capabilities and gaps. That is the area that we are concentrating on right now, and that is what our document says we should be doing. That is what we are doing with the Defense authorization bill. [[Page S3281]] The bill ensures that we have a combat-credible forward posture, and it helps us develop and field the joint capabilities needed to take on the conflicts envisioned by this NDS report. We push back on China's and Russia's attempts to expand their influence by building new alliances and partnerships and strengthening existing ones. They are busy. They are out there. We protect against intrusion from China and Russia in space and beyond. That is what we have in the bill. That is what we are envisioning we will be able to do. We safeguard proprietary technology and intellectual property from being infiltrated by the Government of China. We also reduce our reliance on foreign countries like China as a source for a variety of materials and technologies, including some of the microelectronics and rare earth minerals, but also medical devices. Last but not least, we accelerate investment in research and development into technology that would help us catch up with China and Russia--hypersonic weapons, artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and more. We are not leading in all areas, as most people in America think we are, but we are making such great progress. Our Defense authorization bill last year put us way ahead of where we were before, and this bill does the same thing. So the bill sends a message--a strong message--to China and Russia and anyone else who would try it: We know what you are up to. We know how to stop you. You simply can't win against us. So I encourage my colleagues, first of all, to get all of their amendments in. We are trying to get our amendments in by Friday. If we can do that, we will probably get this thing done possibly even by a week from today. So we have been working on it all year long, and this is one of the bills that we work on all year long, and we have a whole team working, including Liz King and John Bonsell. John Bonsell is the Republican staff director, and Liz is with the Democratic staff group, working with my partner in this. They have worked very well together, and we should have this bill done and ready to take out. Of course, let's keep in mind what we want to accomplish. We want to put our country ahead of China and Russia and get us out of this problem area that we have--an area where our allies believe they are preparing for World War III. So that is what the bill is all about. Hopefully, we will get this thing done and have the necessary ingredients in there. This should be the year that we actually go ahead of China and Russia. We want to make it happen, and this is the only way to do it. I yield the floor. I suggest the absence of a quorum. The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Scott of Florida). The clerk will call the roll. The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll. Mr. HAWLEY. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. ____________________
All in Senate sectionPrev11 of 46Next