Remembering Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Executive Session); Congressional Record Vol. 166, No. 163
(Senate - September 21, 2020)

Text available as:

Formatting necessary for an accurate reading of this text may be shown by tags (e.g., <DELETED> or <BOLD>) or may be missing from this TXT display. For complete and accurate display of this text, see the PDF.


[Page S5728]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]



                Remembering Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

  Mr. COONS. Mr. President, on this past Friday evening, on Rosh 
Hashanah, our Nation lost a giant of our Supreme Court. We lost a 
trailblazer for women's equality, a woman who, though diminutive in 
size, was a giant and a force for justice.
  For my daughter and for all Americans, I am so grateful for the work 
and the service and the life of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader 
Ginsburg. Having passed on Rosh Hashanah, the tradition of the Jewish 
people teaches that she is especially blessed, particularly righteous.
  It is heartbreaking that her dying wish, dictated to her 
granddaughter, was that the voters should choose the next President, 
and that next President her successor, and, already, there are some who 
are racing to undo that wish.
  This was her wish because she understood the consequences of this 
decision for the Senate, for the American people, and for the Supreme 
Court, to which she dedicated 27 years of service.
  If we push through a nominee now, just 43 days before an election, as 
half of our States are already voting, the very legitimacy of the 
Supreme Court may be undermined by further politicization in an already 
divided country.
  My friends, my colleagues in the other party, used the argument in 
blocking the nomination of Merrick Garland in 2016 that we must give 
the American people a voice for the selection of the next Justice. That 
argument was advanced 10 months before the next election. Here, today, 
on this floor, the exact argument is being advanced just 43 days before 
an election in which half of our States are already voting.
  As a colleague from Alaska recently said, the precedent set by the 
majority in 2016 is the precedent by which they should live now. Fair 
is fair. I cannot agree more.
  On the ballot, on the agenda, on the docket of the Supreme Court is 
healthcare. This decision will have an impact on all Americans of all 
stripes and backgrounds. One week after the election, a case will be 
argued in front of the Supreme Court, Texas v. United States, which 
seeks to remove all that is left of the Affordable Care Act's 
protections--protections against preexisting condition discrimination 
for 100 million Americans and health insurance itself for 20 million, 
in the middle of a pandemic in which 6 million Americans have been 
infected and have new preexisting conditions, and, in some ways most 
gallingly, that provision of the Affordable Care Act which prohibits 
gender discrimination by insurance companies.
  All of this is at stake, as are protections going forward after this 
election for clean air and clean water, for equal pay for equal work, 
and the right to organize. It is all on the ballot and will be on the 
docket.
  Let me close by calling on my colleagues to do what is fair and what 
I believe is right: to respect their own precedent and let the American 
people have a voice in just 43 days and then proceed, after the 
election, to honor Justice Ginsburg's dying wish; to focus on 
delivering relief to the American people in a package to address this 
pandemic in our next few weeks, rather than diving deeper into 
division.
  It is my fervent prayer that we can yet find a way together to listen 
to the voice of the people and the voice of this most storied Justice.