Formatting necessary for an accurate reading of this text may be shown by tags (e.g., <DELETED> or <BOLD>) or may be missing from this TXT display. For complete and accurate display of this text, see the PDF.
[Pages H4719-H4720]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
NEED FOR ACTIVE FOREST MANAGEMENT
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from
California (Mr. McClintock) for 5 minutes.
Mr. McCLINTOCK. Mr. Speaker, last week, President Trump came to
California to be briefed on the horrific fires now raging in that
State. Instead, he got a lecture from Governor Newsom and his staff on
climate change.
Well, if Gavin Newsom actually believes that if we all just ride our
bikes to work and set our thermostats to 80 degrees that these
wildfires will go away, then he is completely delusional.
Excess timber comes out of the forest in only two ways: It is either
carried out or it burns out. For most of the 20th century, we carried
it out. It is called logging.
Every year, the U.S. Forest Service foresters would mark off excess
timber, and then we auctioned it off to lumber companies that paid us
to remove it, funding both local communities and the forest service. We
auctioned grazing contracts on our grasslands. The result was healthy
forests, fewer fires, and a thriving economy.
But beginning in the 1970s, we began imposing environmental laws that
have made the management of our lands all but impossible. Draconian
restrictions on logging, grazing, prescriptive burning, and herbicide
use on public lands have made modern land management endlessly time
consuming and, ultimately, cost prohibitive. A single tree thinning
plan typically requires 4 years and more than 800 pages of analysis.
The costs of this process exceed the value of timber, turning land
maintenance from a revenue-generating activity to a revenue-consuming
one.
Since 1980, these laws have produced an 80 percent decline in timber
harvested off of the Federal forests and a concomitant increase in
acreage destroyed by fire. In California, the number of sawmills has
declined from 149 to just 27.
Now, these laws were passed with the promise they would improve the
forests. Well, after more than four decades, I think we are entitled to
ask: How are the forests doing?
An untended forest is just like an untended garden. It will grow and
grow until it chokes itself to death. In a morbidly overcrowded State,
stressed trees fall victim to disease, pestilence, drought, and,
ultimately, catastrophic wildfire. In many regions of the Sierra,
timber density is now four times greater than the land can support.
We have been trying for years to reform these laws, resume active
forest management, and restore our forests to health; yet the
environmental leftists have blocked us every year. Instead, politicians
use the excuse of climate change.
Really? These environmental laws generally apply only to public
lands. Today, you can easily tell the boundaries between private and
public lands solely on the condition of the forests. How clever of the
climate only to decimate the public lands.
The climate has changed much over the centuries, but the problem has
not. When Juan Cabrillo dropped anchor in Santa Monica Bay in October
of 1542, the height of the Santa Ana fire season, he named it the Bay
of Smoke. Before western civilization, paleontologists tell us that we
lost between 4 and 12 million acres a year to wildfire in California.
Modern forests and land management brought that destruction down to
just a quarter of a million acres during the 20th century. That annual
destruction is now back up to 3 million acres a year.
That is not a new normal; that is the old normal reasserting itself.
That is not climate change; that is how nature deals with overgrown
lands. And once destroyed, it can take centuries for our forests to
regrow.
We began active forest management to break that cycle. We decided we
wanted every generation to enjoy our forests. So we introduced
scientific forest management to do a little gardening and keep our
forests healthy by suppressing brush and harvesting excess timber so it
couldn't crowd itself to death. And it worked, until the environmental
laws abandoned science for ideology.
[[Page H4720]]
The planet has been warming and cooling for millennia. Warmer
temperatures make it all the more important to match tree density to
the ability of the land to support it. That means more logging, not
less.
California has taken draconian measures to reduce carbon dioxide
emissions, at a terrible cost for the quality of life of Californians.
We now suffer some of the highest costs for energy in the country; we
have destroyed our manufacturing base; and we can't guarantee enough
electricity to keep our refrigerators running. Yet a single
catastrophic fire makes a mockery of all of these laws and the
sacrifices they impose on our people.
Governor Newsom says he has no patience for such views. Well, that is
a tragedy for all Californians and for all of California's forests.
____________________