Home > Committee Reports > 106th Congress > S. Rept. 106-290

S. Rept. 106-290 - MILITARY CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATION BILL, 2001106th Congress (1999-2000)

Committee Report

Show Overview

Report Type:	Senate Report
Accompanies:	S.2521
Committees:	Senate Appropriations Committee

Listen to this page

Report text available as:

TXT
PDF (PDF provides a complete and accurate display of this text.) Tip ?

Calendar No. 529
106th Congress Report
SENATE
2d Session 106-290

======================================================================

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATION BILL, 2001

_______

May 11, 2000.--Ordered to be printed

_______

Mr. Burns, from the Committee on Appropriations,
submitted the following

R E P O R T

[To accompany S. 2521]

The Committee on Appropriations reports the bill (S. 2521)
making appropriations for military construction, family
housing, and base realignment and closure for the Department of
Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2001, and for
other purposes, reports favorably thereon and recommends that
the bill do pass.

DIVISION A

Total of bill as reported to Senate..................... $8,634,000,000
Amount of 2001 budget estimate.......................... 8,033,908,000
Amount of 2000 appropriations........................... 8,341,950,000
The bill as reported to the Senate:
Over the budget estimate, 2001...................... 600,092,000
Over appropriations for fiscal year 2000............ 292,050,000

C O N T E N T S

----------

DIVISION A

Page
Background:
Purpose of the bill.......................................... 4
Comparative statement........................................ 5
Compliance with section 308 of the Budget Control Act........ 8
Committee recommendation......................................... 8
Items of special interest........................................ 9
Military construction, Army...................................... 15
Military construction, Navy...................................... 16
Military construction, Air Force................................. 17
Military construction, Defense-wide.............................. 17
Military construction, Reserve components........................ 21
NATO Security Investment Program................................. 25
Family housing overview.......................................... 25
Family housing, Army............................................. 26
Family housing, Navy and Marine Corps............................ 27
Family housing, Air Force........................................ 28
Family housing, Defense-wide..................................... 29
Family housing improvement fund.................................. 29
Homeowners assistance fund, Defense.............................. 29
Base realignment and closure account, part IV.................... 31
General provisions............................................... 32
Compliance with paragraph 7, rule XVI of the Standing Rules of
the Senate..................................................... 33
Project listing by location...................................... 33

DIVISION B
TITLE I
COUNTERNARCOTICS
CHAPTER 1
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE--MILITARY

Procurement: Aircraft Procurement, Army.......................... 52
Other Department of Defense Programs:
Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense:
Assistance for Plan Colombia............................. 52
Classified Programs...................................... 53
General provisions--this chapter................................. 53

CHAPTER 2
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Military Construction, Defense-wide.............................. 53
General provision--this chapter.................................. 54

CHAPTER 3
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

U.S. Coast Guard:
Operating expenses........................................... 54
Acquisition, construction and improvements................... 55
Reserve training............................................. 55

TITLE II
PEACEKEEPING OPERATIONS IN KOSOVO AND OTHER NATIONAL SECURITY MATTERS
CHAPTER 1
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE--MILITARY

Storm Damage and Natural Disasters............................... 56
Operation and Maintenance, Army.................................. 56
Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide.......................... 57
Overseas Contingency Operations Transfer Fund.................... 57
Classified Programs.............................................. 58
Procurement: Aircraft Procurement, Air Force..................... 58
Other Department of Defense programs: Defense Health Program..... 58
General provisions--this chapter................................. 59

CHAPTER 2
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Atomic energy defense activities:
Weapons Activities........................................... 61
Other Defense Activities..................................... 62

CHAPTER 3
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Military Construction, Defense-Wide.............................. 63
Military Construction, Army National Guard....................... 63
Military Construction, Army Reserve.............................. 63
General provisions--this chapter................................. 63

TITLE III

General provisions--this division................................ 64

BACKGROUND

Purpose of the Bill

The Military Construction appropriation bill provides
necessary funding for the planning, design, construction,
alteration, and improvement of military facilities worldwide,
both for Active and Reserve Forces. It also finances the
construction, alteration, improvement, operation, and
maintenance of military family housing, including payments
against past housing mortgage indebtedness. Certain types of
community impact assistance may be provided, as well as
assistance to members of the military who face loss on the sale
of private residences due to installation realignments and
closures. The bill is also the source for the U.S. share of the
NATO Security Investment Program. In addition, the bill
provides funding to implement base closures and realignments
authorized by law.

Comparative Statement

The Committee recommends appropriations totaling
$8,634,000,000 for fiscal year 2001 military construction,
family housing, and base closure. The following table displays
the Committee recommendation in comparison with the current
fiscal year, and the President's fiscal year 2001 request.

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY
[In thousands of dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Increase (+) or decrease (-) compared
Committee with--
Item 2000 enacted Budget estimate recommendation ---------------------------------------
2000 enacted Budget estimate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Military construction, Army......................... 1,042,033 897,938 823,503 -218,530 -74,435
Military construction, Navy......................... 901,531 753,422 828,278 -73,253 +74,856
Military construction, Air Force.................... 777,238 530,969 777,793 +555 +246,824
Military construction, Defense-wide................. 593,615 784,753 801,098 +207,483 +16,345
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Active components...................... 3,314,417 2,967,082 3,230,672 -83,745 +263,590

Military construction, Army National Guard.......... 227,456 59,130 233,675 +6,219 +174,545
Military construction, Air National Guard........... 263,724 50,179 183,029 -80,695 +132,850
Military construction, Army Reserve................. 111,340 81,713 99,888 -11,452 +18,175
Military construction, Naval Reserve................ 28,457 16,103 38,532 +10,075 +22,429
Military construction, Air Force Reserve............ 64,404 14,851 25,533 -38,871 +10,682
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Reserve components..................... 695,381 221,976 580,657 -114,724 +358,681
Total, Military construction.................. 4,009,798 3,189,058 3,811,329 -198,469 +622,271
===================================================================================================
NATO Security Investment Program.................... 81,000 190,000 175,000 +94,000 -15,000
===================================================================================================
Family housing, Army:
New construction................................ 41,000 91,974 150,974 +109,974 +59,000
Construction improvements....................... 35,400 63,590 63,590 +28,190 ..................
Planning and design............................. 4,300 6,542 6,542 +2,242 ..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, construction........................ 80,700 162,106 221,106 +140,406 +59,000

Operation and maintenance....................... 1,086,312 978,275 958,364 -127,948 -19,911
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Family housing, Army................... 1,167,012 1,140,381 1,179,470 +12,458 +39,089

Family housing, Navy and Marine Corps:
New construction................................ 134,674 159,317 188,760 +54,086 +29,443
Construction improvements....................... 189,682 183,547 184,047 -5,635 +500
Planning and design............................. 17,715 19,958 19,958 +2,243 ..................
General reduction and revised economic -1,000 .................. .................. +1,000 ..................
assumptions....................................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, construction........................ 341,071 362,822 392,765 +51,694 +29,943

Operation and maintenance....................... 891,470 882,638 881,567 -9,903 -1,071
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Family housing, Navy................... 1,232,541 1,245,460 1,274,332 +41,791 +28,872

Family housing, Air Force:
New construction................................ 203,411 36,677 47,275 -156,136 +10,598
Construction improvements....................... 129,952 174,046 174,046 +44,094 ..................
Planning and design............................. 17,093 12,760 12,760 -4,333 ..................
Foreign currency reduction...................... .................. .................. -6,839 -6,839 -6,839
General reduction and revised economic -1,000 .................. .................. +1,000 ..................
assumptions....................................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal, construction........................ 349,456 223,483 227,242 -122,214 +3,759

Operation and maintenance....................... 818,392 826,271 820,879 +2,487 -5,392
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Family housing, Air Force.............. 1,167,848 1,049,754 1,048,121 -119,727 -1,633

Family housing, Defense-wide: Operation and 41,440 44,886 44,886 +3,446 ..................
maintenance........................................
Department of Defense Family Housing Improvement 2,000 .................. .................. -2,000 ..................
Fund...............................................
===================================================================================================
Total, Family housing......................... 3,610,841 3,480,481 3,546,809 -64,032 +66,328
New construction.......................... (379,085) (287,968) (387,009) (+7,924) (+99,041)
Construction improvements................. (355,034) (421,183) (421,683) (+66,649) (+500)
Planning and design....................... (39,108) (39,260) (39,260) (+152) ..................
General reduction......................... (-2,000) .................. .................. (+2,000) ..................
Operation and maintenance................. (2,837,614) (2,732,070) (2,705,696) (-131,918) (-26,374)
Family Housing Improvement Fund........... (2,000) .................. .................. (-2,000) ..................
===================================================================================================
Base realignment and closure accounts: Part IV...... 672,311 1,174,369 1,174,369 +502,058 ..................

GENERAL PROVISIONS

General provision (Sec. 125)........................ .................. .................. -73,507 -73,507 -73,507
Across-the-board cut (.38 percent) (Public Law 106- -32,000 .................. .................. +32,000 ..................
113)...............................................
===================================================================================================
Grand total: New budget (obligational) 8,341,950 8,033,908 8,634,000 +292,050 +600,092
authority....................................
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Compliance With Section 308 of the Budget Control Act

Section 308(a) of the Budget and Impoundment Control Act of
1974 (Public Law 93-344) requires that the Committee include in
its report a comparison of its recommendations with levels
contained in the first concurrent resolution. Appropriate data
are reflected below:

BUDGETARY IMPACT OF BILL
PREPARED IN CONSULTATION WITH THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE PURSUANT TO SEC. 308(a), PUBLIC LAW 93-344, AS
AMENDED
[In millions of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget authority Outlays
---------------------------------------------------
Committee Amount of Committee Amount of
allocation bill allocation bill
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparison of amounts in the bill with Committee allocations
to its subcommittees of amounts in the First Concurrent
Resolution for 2001: Subcommittee on Military Construction:
General purpose, defense discretionary.................. ........... 8,634 ........... \1\ 5,044
General purpose, non-defense discretion- ary........... ........... ........... ........... 23
Mandatory............................................... ........... ........... ........... ...........
Projections of outlays associated with the recommendation:
2000.................................................... ........... ........... ........... \2\ 4,598
2001.................................................... ........... ........... ........... 1,384
2002.................................................... ........... ........... ........... 3,977
2003.................................................... ........... ........... ........... 2,015
2004.................................................... ........... ........... ........... 800
2005 and future year.................................... ........... ........... ........... 536
Financial assistance to State and local governments for 2001 NA ........... NA ...........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Includes outlays from prior-year budget authority.
\2\ Excludes outlays from prior-year budget authority.

NA: Not applicable.

Committee Recommendation

The Committee recommends new fiscal year 2001
appropriations of $8,634,000,000. This is $600,092,000 over the
budget request, and $292,050,000 over the appropriations for
fiscal year 2000. The basis for this recommendation is
contained in the following ``Items of special interest,'' and
under the discussions pertaining to each individual
appropriation. Complete project detail is provided in the
tables at the end of the report.

ITEMS OF SPECIAL INTEREST

COMPLIANCE WITH 302(b) ALLOCATION

The Appropriations Committee conformed fully to the budget
resolution for defense spending in its 302(b) allocation. This
allocation divided the budget authority and outlays among the
subcommittees with jurisdiction over discretionary spending. In
this recommended bill, the Appropriations Committee has
remained within the tight constraints of its 302(b) allocation
for military construction.

hearings

The Subcommittee on Military Construction held hearings on
the fiscal year 2001 budget request during February and March
2000. The subcommittee heard testimony from representatives of
the military services and defense agencies concerning fiscal
year 2001 budget priorities and base realignment and closure
issues.

summary of committee recommendations

The budget request for fiscal year 2001 reflects an
increase of $292,050,000 from the amount enacted in fiscal year
2000. The Committee notes, with great concern, the continuous
under investment by the Department of Defense in military
facilities and infrastructure. This proposed level of funding
does not provide sufficient resources to continue the
Department's efforts to modernize, renovate, and improve aging
defense facilities.
The effects of sustained and structural inattention by the
Department and the military services to basic infrastructure
are apparent on nearly every military installation. This will
continue to have long-term implications as facilities continue
to age disproportionately without a sustained level of
investment in maintenance and repair.
The requested funding level reflects a lack of commitment
by the administration to reduce the serious backlog of
readiness, revitalization and quality of life projects. The
Committee urges the Department to develop a comprehensive
funding strategy and plan to address these serious
infrastructure problems.
The Committee recommends an additional $600,092,000 above
the fiscal year 2001 budget request. The total recommended
appropriation for fiscal year 2001 is $8,634,000,000, an
increase of $292,050,000 from fiscal year 2000 funding.

conformance with authorization bill

The Senate has not yet considered the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 which normally contains
authorization for the military construction, family housing and
base realignment funding contained in this bill.

Contingency funding

The Department of Defense requested no contingency funding
for military construction and family housing projects in the
fiscal year 2001 budget request. The Committee believes that
some level of contingency funding is essential for the
efficient and cost-effective completion of these projects. If
the Department loses this funding flexibility, it will be
incapable of supporting requirements generated by unforeseen
needs, such as environmental and regulatory requirements,
unanticipated subsurface conditions and changes in the bid
climate.
Construction cost growth has averaged 7-8 percent for the
Department of Defense, compared with 10 percent typical for the
construction industry. Approximately 80 percent of cost growth
is related to unforeseen site conditions, design errors and
omissions, and contractor schedule impacts. The remaining 20
percent of cost growth is for essential mission, operation, and
equipment changes.
Without sufficient contingency funds, each unforeseen
requirement would require deletion of an equivalent amount of
work on another project. This potentially puts other military
construction projects in jeopardy as well. These actions will
slow construction progress, increase the risk of work
suspension, delay completion dates, and increase inspection and
overhead costs. Ultimately, the total cost of construction will
significantly increase with a corresponding decrease in the
scope, quality and timeliness of completed projects. The
Committee directs the Department to include 5 percent
contingency funding when requesting construction funds in the
fiscal year 2002 budget submission and for future year
projects.

environmental compliance projects

The Department requested $25,660,000 for environmental
compliance project construction during fiscal year 2001. The
Federal Facilities Compliance Act requires all Federal
facilities to meet both Federal and State standards. These
projects are considered class I violations and are out of
compliance; have received an enforcement action from
regulators; and/or a compliance agreement has been signed or
consent order received. Environmental projects that are class I
violations are required to be funded, and therefore, placed at
the top of the priority list. The Committee has approved the
request of $25,660,000 in full. In order to help address these
class I violations, an additional $75,636,000 is recommended.
The total appropriation for environmental compliance projects
in this bill is $101,296,000.
Following is a list of all environmental projects funded in
this bill:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee
Installation/project title Request recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army: Kansas: Fort Riley: Advance Waste .............. $22,000,000
Water Treatment Facility...............
Army National Guard: Pennsylvania: Fort .............. 8,197,000
Indiantown Gap: Replace Waste Treatment
Plant Sewage line......................
Navy:
Hawaii: Ford Island: Sewer Force .............. 6,900,000
Main...............................
Washington: Puget Sound Naval $6,600,000 6,600,000
Shipyard: Oily Wastewater Collec-
tion...............................
Air Force:
Alaska:
Cape Romanzov AFS: Generator 3,900,000 3,900,000
Fuel Storage...................
Eielson AFB: Hazardous Material 1,450,000 1,450,000
Storage........................
California:
Beale AFB: Water Treatment Plant 3,800,000 3,800,000
Vandenberg AFB: Upgrade Water 4,650,000 4,650,000
Distribution System............
Georgia: Moody AFB: Water Treatment 2,500,000 2,500,000
Plant..............................
Nebraska: Offutt AFB: Fire/Crash .............. 9,765,000
Rescue Station.....................
New Mexico: Holloman AFB: Repair .............. 18,380,000
Bonito Pipeline....................
Wyoming: FE Warren AFB: Upgrade .............. 10,394,000
Storm Water Drainage...............
Turkey: Incirlik Air Base: Fire 1,000,000 1,000,000
Training Facility..................
Air National Guard: Arkansas: Fort 1,760,000 1,760,000
Smith: Fire Training Facility..........
-------------------------------
Total............................. 25,660,000 101,296,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Committee again directs the Department to devote the
maximum amount of resources to actual cleanups and to limit
resources expended on administration, support, studies, and
investigations to the greatest extent possible.

REPROGRAMMING RULES/CRITERIA

The following rules apply for all military construction and
family housing reprogrammings. A projects or account (including
the sub-elements of an account) which has been specifically
reduced by the Congress in acting on the appropriation request
is considered to be a congressional interest item. A prior
approval reprogramming is required for any increase to an item
that has specifically reduced by the Congress. Accordingly, no
below threshold reprogrammings to an item specifically reduced
by the Congress are permitted.
The reprogramming criteria that apply to military
construction projects (25 percent of the funded amount or
$2,000,000, whichever is less) continue to apply to new housing
construction projects and to improvements over $2,000,000. To
provide the individual services the flexibility to proceed with
construction contracts without disruption or delay, the costs
associated with environmental hazard remediation such as
asbestos removal, radon abatement, lead-based paint removal or
abatement, and any other legislated environmental hazard
remediation may be excluded, provided that such remediation
requirements could not be reasonably anticipated at the time of
budget submission. This exclusion applies to projects
authorized in the budget year, and also projects authorized in
prior years for which construction contracts have not been
completed.
Furthermore, in instances where a prior approval
reprogramming request for a project or account has been
approved by the Committee, the amount approved becomes the new
base for any future increase or decrease via below threshold
reprogrammings (provided that the project or account is not a
congressional interest item).

transfer authority

The budget request proposed a general provision which would
allow the transfer of up to $67,000,000 between any accounts in
the bill, and this could be accomplished at the determination
of the Secretary of Defense and upon the approval of OMB.
Congress would be given an ``after the fact'' notification. The
Committee believes that the existing reprogramming procedures
are sufficient in solving urgent, high priority funding
problems within available resources and denies this request.

foreign currency fluctuations

The U.S. dollar has significantly improved against most
foreign currencies since the Department of Defense submitted
its fiscal year 2001 budget. Accordingly, the Committee
recommends a total reduction of $43,852,000 to the following
appropriations due to these favorable fluctuations in exchange
rates:

Military Construction, Army............................. -$635,000
Military Construction, Navy............................. -2,889,000
Military Construction, Defense-Wide..................... -7,115,000
Family Housing, Army.................................... -19,911,000
Family Housing, Navy and Marine Corps................... -1,071,000
Family Housing, Air Force............................... -12,231,000
--------------------------------------------------------
____________________________________________________
Total............................................. -43,852,000

base realignment and closure

The Committee has included $1,174,369,000 for the ``Base
realignment and closure'' account. The Committee has fully
funded the budget request for base closure and realignment.
This includes funding of the requirements for environmental
cleanup at closing and realigning bases.

barracks construction

The fiscal year 2001 budget request includes $668,025,000
to construct or modernize 38 barracks projects.
The Committee recommends $712,219,000 for 43 barracks
construction projects in fiscal year 2001, an increase of
$44,194,000 over the budget request. This additional funding is
provided to help reduce the unaccompanied housing deficit and
modernize existing barracks.
The Committee did not provide funding for the unaccompanied
contractor housing at Kwajalien Atoll. Funding for the
expeditionary airmen quarters at Manta AB, Ecuador, was
provided in the fiscal year 2000 supplemental. The approved
projects are as follows:

BARRACKS CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Request Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army:
California: Fort Irwin.................... $31,000,000 $31,000,000
Georgia:
Fort Benning.......................... 24,000,000 24,000,000
Fort Stewart.......................... 26,000,000 26,000,000
Hawaii:
Schofield Barracks.................... 46,400,000 46,400,000
Wheeler Army Air Field................ 43,800,000 43,800,000
Kansas: Fort Riley........................ 15,000,000 15,000,000
Kentucky: Fort Campbell................... 9,400,000 9,400,000
Maryland: Fort Meade...................... ........... 19,000,000
New Jersey: Fort Dix...................... ........... 9,975,000
North Carolina:
Fort Bragg............................ 26,000,000 26,000,000
Fort Bragg............................ 45,600,000 45,600,000
Fort Bragg............................ 38,600,000 38,600,000
Germany:
Bamberg............................... 7,800,000 7,800,000
Bamberg............................... 3,850,000 3,850,000
Darmstadt............................. 5,700,000 5,700,000
Darmstadt............................. 5,600,000 5,600,000
Mannheim.............................. 4,050,000 4,050,000
Korea:
Camp Humphreys........................ 14,200,000 14,200,000
Camp Page............................. 19,500,000 19,500,000
Kwajalein: Kwajalein Atoll................ 18,000,000 ...........
Navy/Marine Corps:
California: Lemoore Naval Air Station..... 8,260,000 8,260,000
District of Columbia: Washington Marine 17,197,000 17,197,000
Barracks.................................
Georgia: NAS Atlanta...................... ........... 5,970,000
Hawaii:
Kaneohe Bay Marine Corps Base......... 18,400,000 18,400,000
Pearl Harbor Naval Station............ 16,500,000 16,500,000
Illinois:
Great Lakes Naval Training Center..... 37,000,000 37,000,000
Great Lakes Naval Training Center..... 37,700,000 37,700,000
North Carolina: Camp Lejeune Marine Corps 14,300,000 14,300,000
Base.....................................
Virginia: Norfolk Naval Shipyard.......... 16,100,000 16,100,000
CONUS Various............................. 11,500,000 11,500,000
Italy: Naples Naval Support Activity...... 15,000,000 15,000,000
Air Force:
Alaska:
Eielson AFB........................... 14,540,000 14,540,000
Elmendorf AFB......................... 15,920,000 15,920,000
Colorado: Peterson AFB.................... 11,000,000 11,000,000
Florida: Eglin AFB........................ 5,600,000 5,600,000
Georgia: Moody AFB........................ ........... 8,818,000
Louisiana: Barksdale AFB.................. 6,390,000 6,390,000
New York: Niagara Air Reserve Station..... ........... 6,881,000
Oklahoma: Tinker AFB...................... 5,800,000 5,800,000
Texas: Lackland AFB....................... 5,500,000 5,500,000
Utah: Hill AFB............................ ........... 11,550,000
Virginia: Langley AFB..................... 7,470,000 7,470,000
Italy: Aviano AB.......................... 8,000,000 8,000,000
Korea: Osan AB............................ 11,348,000 11,348,000
-------------------------
Total................................... 668,025,000 712,219,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Real Property Maintenance Reporting Requirement

The Committee recommends a continuation of the following
general rules for repairing a facility under Operations and
Maintenance account funding:
Components of the facility may be repaired by replacement,
and such replacement can be up to current standards or code.
Interior arrangements and restorations may be included as
repair, but additions, new facilities, and functional
conversions must be performed as military construction
projects.
Such projects may be done concurrent with repair projects,
as long as the final conjunctively funded project is a complete
and usable facility.
The appropriate Service Secretary shall submit a 21-day
notification prior to carrying out any repair project with an
estimated cost in excess of $7,500,000.
The Department is directed to continue to provide the real
property maintenance backlog at all installations for which
there is a requested construction project in future budget
requests. This information is to be provided on Form 1390. In
addition, for all troop housing requests, the Form 1391 is to
continue to show all real property maintenance conducted in the
past 2 years and all future requirements for unaccompanied
housing at that installation.

Child Development Centers

The fiscal year 2001 budget request includes $17,040,000
for 4 child development center projects. The Committee
recommends $33,236,000 for a total of 7 projects.
The following child development center projects are
provided for fiscal year 2001:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Request Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army: Germany: Kaiserslautern................. $3,400,000 $3,400,000
Puerto Rico: Fort Buchanan.................... ........... 3,700,000
Navy: North Carolina: Camp Lejeune Marine 4,420,000 4,420,000
Corps Base...................................
Air Force:
Alaska: Elmendorf AFB..................... ........... 7,666,000
District of Columbia: Bolling AFB......... 4,520,000 4,520,000
Texas: Lackland AFB....................... ........... 4,830,000
Defense-Wide: Pennsylvania: Susquehanna 4,700,000 4,700,000
Defense Dist Depot...........................
-------------------------
Total................................... 17,040,000 33,236,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Military Construction, Army

Appropriations, 2000.................................... $1,042,033,000
Budget estimate, 2001................................... 897,938,000
Committee recommendation................................ 823,503,000

The Committee recommends $823,503,000 for the Army for
fiscal year 2001. This is a decrease of $74,435,000 from the
budget request for fiscal year 2001. This also reflects the
realignment of the Chemical Demilitarization Program
responsibility from the Army. (See State tables at the end of
the report for complete program recommendations.)
The Committee fully expects contracts for the following
projects to be awarded, as early in fiscal year 2001 as
practical:
Birch Hill Trail and lighting, Fort Wainwright, AK.--Of the
$20,200,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within
the ``Military Construction, Army'' account, the Committee
directs that not less than $280,000 be made available for
modifications to the Birch Hill Trail.
Certified chemical lab, White Sands Missile Range, NM.--Of
the $20,200,000 provided for unspecified minor construction
within the ``Military Construction, Army'' account, the
Committee directs that not less than $1,000,000 be made
available to construct a certified chemical lab.
Biathlon live fire course, Fort Wainwright, AK.--Of the
$20,200,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within
the ``Military Construction, Army'' account, the Committee
directs that not less than $900,000 be made available to
construct a biathlon live fire course.
Power train modernization facility, Anniston Army Depot,
AL.--Of the $84,706,000 provided for planning and design within
the ``Military Construction, Army'' account, the Committee
directs that not less than $1,600,000 be made available for the
design of this facility.
Historic properties, Fort Vancouver, WA.--Of the
$20,200,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within
the ``Military Construction, Army'' account, the Committee
directs that not less than $1,500,000 be made available for
protection of historic facilities at Fort Vancouver, WA.
Fire station addition, Fort Richardson, AK.--Of the
$20,200,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within
the ``Military Construction, Army'' account, the Committee
directs that not less than $1,500,000 be made available to
build an addition to the fire station at Fort Wainwright.
Replace airfield, Dugway Proving Ground, UT.--Of the
$84,706,000 provided for planning and design within the
``Military Construction, Army'' account, the Committee directs
that up to $1,500,000 be made available for the design of these
repairs for Michael Army Airfield, Dugway Proving Ground, UT.
MOUT facility, Fort Richardson, AK.--Of the $84,706,000
provided for planning and design within the ``Military
Construction, Army'' account, the Committee directs that not
less than $2,500,000 be made available for the design of a MOUT
facility.
RAH-66 training facility, Fort Rucker, AL.--Of the
$84,706,000 provided for planning and design within the
``Military Construction, Army'' account, the Committee directs
that not less than $2,000,000 be made available for the design
of this facility.

Military Construction, Navy

Appropriations, 2000.................................... $901,531,000
Budget estimate, 2001................................... 753,422,000
Committee recommendation................................ 828,278,000

The Committee recommends $828,278,000 for Navy and Marine
Corps military construction for fiscal year 2001. This amount
is an increase of $74,856,000 from the fiscal year 2001 budget
request. (See State tables at the end of the report for
complete program recommendations.)
The Committee fully expects contracts for the following
projects to be awarded, as early in fiscal year 2001 as
practical:
Channel dredging, Naval Station Pascagoula, MS.--Of the
$11,659,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within
the ``Military Construction, Navy'' account, the Committee
directs that not less than $1,400,000 be made available for
channel dredging at the Naval Station, Pascagoula, MS.
Fleet recreation center, Bremerton, WA.--Of the $11,659,000
provided for unspecified minor construction within the
``Military Construction, Navy'' account, the Committee directs
that not less than $1,400,000 be made available to construct a
fleet recreation center.
Wastewater treatment pipeline/facility, Meridan NAS, MS.--
Of the $11,659,000 provided for unspecified minor construction
within the ``Military Construction, Navy'' account, the
Committee directs that not less than $1,200,000 be made
available to construct a wastewater treatment pipeline/
facility.
Education center, Corpus Christi Naval Station, TX.--Of the
$11,659,000 provided for unspecified minor construction with
the ``Military Construction, Navy'' account, the Committee
directs that not less than $1,250,000 be made to construct an
education center at the Corpus Christi Naval Station, TX.
BEQ, Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, NH.--Of the $71,000,000
provided for planning and design within the ``Military
Construction, Navy'' account, the Committee directs that not
less than $1,500,000 be made available for the design of a BEQ.
Applied instruction building, Newport NS, RI.--Of the
$71,000,000 provided for planning and design within the
``Military Construction, Navy'' account, the Committee directs
that not less than $1,000,000 be made available for the design
of this facility.
National maritime technology information center, Carderock
Division, NSWC, MD.--Of the $71,000,000 provided for planning
and design within the ``Military Construction, Navy'' account,
the Committee directs that not less than $1,000,000 be made
available for the design of this facility.

Military Construction, Air Force

Appropriations, 2000.................................... $777,238,000
Budget estimate, 2001................................... 530,969,000
Committee recommendation................................ 777,793,000

The Committee recommends $777,793,000 for the Air Force in
fiscal year 2001. This is an increase of $246,824,000 to the
fiscal year 2001 budget request. (See State tables at the end
of the report for complete program recommendations.)
The Committee fully expects contracts for the following
projects to be awarded, as early in fiscal year 2001 as
practical:
Range support squadron facility, Mt. Home AFB, ID.--Of the
$11,350,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within
the ``Military Construction, Air Force'' account, the Committee
directs that not less than $1,500,000 be made available to
construct a range support squadron facility.
HQ, PACAF Revitalization, Hickam AFB, HI.--Of the
$69,337,000 provided for planning and design within the
``Military Construction, Air Force'' account, the Committee
directs that not less than $2,000,000 be made available for the
planning and design work necessary to revitalize and
operationalize this facility.
Control tower, Dover AFB, DE.--The Committee notes that the
control tower at Dover AFB is antiquated, inadequately sited,
and lacks modern air traffic control equipment. Given the
activity level and mission critical nature of this base, the
project appears to be an excellent candidate for the
President's fiscal year 2002 budget. Accordingly, the Committee
urges the Secretary of the Air Force to review this project,
and to expedite its advancement into the fiscal year 2002
budget.
Ramp extension, Minot AFB, ND.--The Committee notes that a
shortage of ramp space at Minot AFB has affected the operations
and efficiency of the 5th Bomb Wing. Design for a ramp
extension project to correct this situation is complete, and
the Committee urges the Air Force to advance this project into
the President's fiscal year 2002 budget so that it can be
undertaken without delay.
C-17 facilities.--Of the $69,337,000 provided for planning
and design within the ``Military Construction, Air Force''
account, the Committee directs that not less than $3,600,000 be
made available for planning and site assessments of Elmendorf
AFB and Hickam AFB in order to provide long-term support for C-
17 aircraft within the PACOM theater of operations.

Military Construction, Defense-wide

Appropriations, 2000.................................... $593,615,000
Budget estimate, 2001................................... 784,753,000
Committee recommendation................................ 801,098,000

The Committee recommends $801,098,000 for projects
considered within the ``Defense-wide'' account. The amount
recommended is an increase of $16,345,000 from the fiscal year
2001 budget request. This increase reflects the realignment of
the Chemical Demilitarization Program responsibility to this
appropriation. (See State tables at the end of the report for
complete program recommendations.)

chemical demilitarization

The budget request identified a requirement of $175,400,000
for the construction of the following chemical weapon
demilitarization facilities in fiscal year 2001. The Committee
recommends a total of $175,400,000 for this program.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
State/installation/project Request Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arkansas: Pine Bluff Arsenal: Ammunition $43,600,000 $43,600,000
Demilitarization Facility, Phase V...........
Colorado: Pueblo Depot Activity: Ammunition 10,700,000 10,700,000
Demilitarization Facility, Phase II.........
Indiana: Newport Army Ammunition Plant: 54,400,000 54,400,000
Ammunition Demilitarization Facility, Phase
III..........................................
Kentucky: Bluegrass Army Depot: Ammunition 8,500,000 8,500,000
Demilitarization Facility, Phase II.........
Maryland:
Aberdeen Proving Ground: Ammunition 45,700,000 45,700,000
Demilitarization Facility, Phase II.....
Aberdeen Proving Ground: Munitions 3,100,000 3,100,000
Assessment/Processing Systems Facility..
Oregon: Umatilla Depot Activity:Ammunition 9,400,000 9,400,000
Demilitarization Facility, Phase VI.........
-------------------------
Total................................... 175,400,000 175,400,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

The budget request proposes that these amounts should be
appropriated under the ``Military Construction, Army'' account.
As in prior years, the Committee recommends that these amounts
be appropriated under the ``Military Construction, Defense-
wide'' account, in order to facilitate the tracking of expenses
for the Chemical Demilitarization Program, and to avoid
distorting the size of the Army's military construction
program.
The Committee believes that the focus on this program must
remain at the Office of the Secretary of the Defense rather
than at the service level and directs the Department to submit
the fiscal year 2002 budget accordingly.
The following chart displays the scope of the military
construction investment in the overall chemical
demilitarization program:

CHEMICAL DEMILITARIZATION PROGRAM MILITARY CONSTRUCTION COSTS
[In millions of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1999 Fiscal year--
and ------------------------------------------------------ Total
prior 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tooele................................. 198.00 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ........
Anniston............................... 174.20 7.0 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ........
Umatilla Depot......................... 11.20 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ........
Umatilla Facility...................... 157.40 25.9 9.4 ....... ....... ....... ....... ........
Pine Bluff Depot....................... 10.00 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ........
Pine Bluff Facility.................... 58.00 49.8 43.6 ....... ....... ....... ....... ........
Pueblo Depot........................... 6.30 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ........
Pueblo Facility........................ ....... ....... 10.7 80.5 83.4 10.9 ....... ........
Blue Grass Depot....................... ....... 2.0 8.5 ....... ....... ....... ....... ........
Blue Grass Facility.................... ....... ....... ....... 20.0 78.0 87.0 10.0 ........
Aberdeen CDTF.......................... 16.10 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ........
Aberdeen Depot......................... 1.90 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ........
Aberdeen Facility...................... 26.50 53.5 45.7 51.6 ....... ....... ....... ........
Newport Depot.......................... 2.00 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ........
Newport Facility....................... 11.50 35.9 54.4 78.0 ....... ....... ....... ........
MAPS Facility.......................... ....... ....... 3.1 ....... ....... ....... ....... ........
Planning & Design...................... 114.50 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ........
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................ 787.60 174.1 175.4 230.1 161.4 97.9 10.0 1,636.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Medical construction program

The fiscal year 2001 budget request included $177,887,000
for 13 projects and for unspecified minor construction to
provide hospital and medical facilities, including treatment,
training, and medical research and development facilities. The
Committee recommends a total of $138,037,000 for Department of
Defense medical projects. Funding for the Naples, Italy
medical/dental facility replacement project is deferred until
the issues surrounding further construction in the Naples area
are resolved.
The following hospital and medical projects are recommended
for fiscal year 2001:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location/project title Request Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alaska: Fort Wainwright: Hospital $44,000,000 $44,000,000
Replacement (Phase II).................
California:
Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Base: 2,900,000 2,900,000
Fleet Hospital Ops/Training Command
Support Fac........................
Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Base: 3,950,000 3,950,000
Medical/Dental Clinic Replacement
(Horno)............................
Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Base: 3,550,000 3,550,000
Medical/Dental Clinic Replacement
(Las Flores).......................
Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Base: 3,750,000 3,750,000
Medical/Dental Clinic Replacement
(Las Pulgas).......................
Edwards AFB: Medical Clinic Addition/ 17,900,000 17,900,000
Dental Clinic Alteration...........
Florida:
Eglin AFB: Add/Alter Hospital/Life 37,600,000 37,600,000
Safety Upgrade.....................
Patrick AFB: Medical Clinic......... 2,700,000 2,700,000
Tyndall AFB: Add/Alter Medical 7,700,000 7,700,000
Clinic.............................
New Hampshire: Pease International Trade .............. 4,000,000
Port: Medical Training Facil- ity.....
New York: Fort Drum: Veterinary 1,400,000 1,400,000
Treatment Facility.....................
Germany:
Kitzingen: Health /Dental Clinic 1,400,000 1,400,000
Life Safety Upgrade................
Wiesbaden AB: Add/Alter Health/ 7,187,000 7,187,000
Dental Clinic......................
Italy: Naples Naval Support Activity: 43,850,000 ..............
Medical/Dental Facility Replace- ment.
-------------------------------
Total............................. 177,887,000 138,037,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP).--The Committee
recognizes the importance of the Armed Forces Institute of
Pathology. It is concerned about the deplorable condition of
the current facilities. Recent studies have identified
extensive safety, occupational health and operational
deficiencies. The Committee notes the requirement contained in
the conference report accompanying the National Defense
Authorization Act for 2000 (Public Law 106-65), for the
Secretary of Defense to submit a report on alternative methods
of improving AFIP, including private funding and lease back. To
date, this report has not been submitted. The Committee directs
the Department of Defense to provide this report which provides
alternatives and funding recommendations for improving the AFIP
facilities to the congressional defense committees without
further delay. Thirty days after the Secretary submits the
above mentioned report to Congress, the Secretary may make
available up to $3,500,000 from funds available for ``Military
Construction, Defense-Wide'' planning and design for this
project, if such action is consistent with the findings of the
report.
Contingency construction.--The Committee has provided
$10,000,000 for the Secretary of Defense ``Contingency
construction'' account in accordance with the budget request.
This account provides funds which may be used by the Secretary
of Defense for unforeseen facility requirements. The Committee
believes that the funding provided to the account is adequate
to meet the needs of the Department.
Forward operating locations [FOLS].--The fiscal year 2001
budget requests $76,823,000 for the construction of facilities
at FOLS in Ecuador, Curacao and Aruba, Netherland Antilles.
These three forward deployment sites are to support counterdrug
operations in the transit and source zones.
The Committee provided these funds as part of the Fiscal
Year 2000 Emergency Supplemental bill.

WEAPONS STORAGE AND MAINTENANCE FACILITY, FORT BRAGG, NC.

The Committee understands that the U.S. Special Operations
Command maintains, repairs, and sustains foreign and
nonstandard military small arms in support of Special
Operations Forces (SOF) units. Further, the Committee
understands that the facility where the Command currently
performs this SOF-unique small arms training may be inadequate
for current and future mission requirements. The Committee
directs the Special Operation Command to provide a report of
the needed improvements in the overall infrastructure required
to ensure the safety certification and efficiency of those
foreign weapons. This report should be provided to the
Committee by June 15, 2001.

energy conservation and improvement project

The Department of Defense has a total of $39,500,000 in
unobligated balances available for this initiative.
Accordingly, the fiscal year 2001 budget request for
$33,570,000 of additional funding is not recommended.

ALKALI SILICA REACTIVITY

The Committee continues to be concerned about the effects
of alkali silica reactivity (ASR) on concrete facilities,
including aprons, taxiways, runways, and tarmacs, and
therefore, directs the Secretary of Defense and the Corps of
Engineers to investigate instances of ASR at domestic and
international defense installations.

ANTILLES CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL SYSTEM

The Committee is concerned about recent reports concerning
the condition of Department of Defense schools in Puerto Rico.
Problems such as dilapidated buildings, inadequate supplies,
inconsistent teaching quality, and lack of curriculum standards
have continued to undermine confidence in these schools. Given
the importance of providing quality education to dependent
children of military personnel, the Committee directs the
Department to provide the congressional defense committees a
report on these deficiencies by August 1, 2000. This report
should also provide corrective measures that the Department of
Defense intends to implement and an associated time line for
resolving these issues.

Department of Defense Military Unaccompanied Housing Improvement Fund

The budget request proposed a general provision, which
would allow the transfer of funds from the military
construction accounts to the Military Unaccompanied Housing
Improvement Fund. Due to the absence of any programmed or
anticipated projects under this fund, the Committee denies the
Department's request for transfer authority.

Military Construction, Reserve Components

Appropriations, 2000.................................... $695,381,000
Budget estimate, 2001................................... 221,976,000
Committee recommendation................................ 580,657,000

The Committee recommends $580,657,000 for military
construction projects for the Guard and Reserve components.
This amount is $358,681,000 above the fiscal year 2001 budget
request. This increase reflects the Committee's continued
strong support for the Guard and Reserve.
The Committee's recommended action on each Reserve
component project is reflected in the State list at the end of
this report.
The Committee recommends approval of military construction,
Reserve component as outlined in the following table:

RESERVE COMPONENT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component Request Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army National Guard..................... $59,130,000 $233,675,000
Air National Guard...................... 50,179,000 183,029,000
Army Reserve............................ 81,713,000 99,888,000
Naval Reserve........................... 16,103,000 38,532,000
Air Force Reserve....................... 14,851,000 25,533,000
-------------------------------
Total............................. 221,976,000 580,657,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Weapons of Mass Destruction--Civil Support Teams.--The
Committee notes the continued progress by the Department in
creating the Weapons of Mass Destruction--Civil Support Teams
(WMDCST).
However, as the National Guard assumes this new mission,
many of these teams do not have adequate facilities from which
to train, to coordinate with other federal and state agencies,
and to store decontamination and reconnaissance equipment. Any
outstanding requirements in this area must be fully integrated
into the overall resourcing strategy for responding to weapons
of mass destruction. The Committee has provided the Army
National Guard an additional $25,000,000 specifically for
unspecified minor construction funding to directly support
WMDCST requirements. The Committee directs the Chief of the
National Guard Bureau to report to the congressional defense
committees on the distribution of these funds no later than
February 15, 2001.
The Committee has added $28,563,000 for specific Reserve
component planning and design initiatives and minor
construction projects listed below. The Department is expected
to program the construction funds for these projects.
Planning and design.--The Committee recommendation provides
an additional $33,975,000 over the budget request for planning
and design activities for the Reserve components.
The Committee fully expects contracts for the following
projects to be awarded, as early in fiscal year 2001 as
practical:
Upgrade airfield facilities, Des Moines IAP, IA.--Of the
$19,119,000 provided for planning and design with the ``Air
National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $800,000 be made available for the design of these
upgrades.
Armed Services Reserve Center, Kalispell, MT.--Of the
$22,232,000 provided for planning and design within the ``Army
National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $627,000 be made available for the design of an Armed
Forces Reserve Center.
Army aviation support facility, Sante Fe, NM.--Of the
$22,232,000 provided for planning and design within the ``Army
National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $1,440,000 be made available for the design of an Army
aviation support facility.
Composite aircraft maintenance complex, Nashville IAP,
TN.--Of the $19,119,000 provided for planning and design within
the ``Air National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that
not less than $800,000 be made available for the design on this
facility.
Entry way/guard facility, Fort Harrison, MT.--Of the
$22,232,000 provided for planning and design within the ``Army
National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $100,000 be made available for the design of an entry way/
guard facility at Fort Harrison, MT.
Training site barracks/dining/administration complex, Camp
Rapid, SD.--Of the $22,232,000 provided for planning and design
within the ``Army National Guard'' account, the Committee
directs that not less than $980,000 be made available for the
design of a training site barracks/dining/administration/
parking complex.
C-12 hangar, Helena, MT.--Of the $12,775,000 provided for
unspecified minor construction within the ``Army National
Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less than
$1,200,000 be made available to construct a C-12 hangar.
Rural armory improvement, NV.--Of the $12,775,000 provided
for unspecified minor construction within the ``Army National
Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less than
$1,490,000 be made available for rural armory improvements in
Elko, Ely, Winnemucca, Fallon and Yerington, NV.
Combined Public Safety Training Center, Spokane, WA.--The
Committee notes the meritorious nature of the joint use Army
National Guard Public Safety Training Center planned for
Spokane, WA. Planning and design funds have previously been
made available for this project, and the Committee urges the
Army National Guard to advance the project into the President's
fiscal year 2002 budget.
Infrastructure improvements, Fort Harrison, MT.--Of the
$12,775,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within
the ``Army National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that
not less than $1,200,000 be made available for infrastructure
improvements.
Army aviation support facility, Camp Robinson, AR.--The
Committee notes the urgent requirement for the replacement of
the Army aviation support facility at Camp Robinson, AR. The
current facility is wholly inadequate in terms of accommodating
both equipment and personnel. The Committee encourages the Army
National Guard to advance this project into the President's
fiscal year 2002 budget.
BOQ/BEQ, Fort Harrison, MT.--Of the $12,775,000 provide for
unspecified minor construction within the ``Army National
Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less than
$1,200,000 be made available for construction of a BOQ/BEQ.
Readiness centers, WV.--Of the $22,232,000 provided for
planning and design within the ``Army National Guard'' account,
the Committee directs that not less than $2,400,000 be made
available for the design of readiness centers in Summersville,
Sam Black Church, and Moorefield, WV.
Army Aviation Support Center, Fort Leonardwood, MO.--Of the
$12,775,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within
the ``Army National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that
not less than $1,260,000 be made available for the construction
of this facility.
Armory addition, Fairfield, IA.--Of the $12,775,000
provided for unspecified minor construction within the ``Army
National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $1,066,000 be made available for the construction of this
facility.
Aviation classification and repair activity depot, Fresno,
CA.--Of the $22,232,000 provided for planning and design within
the ``Army National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that
not less than $2,000,000 be made available for the design of
this facility.
Load crew training facility, Great Falls, MT.--Of the
$19,119,000 provided for planning and design within the ``Air
National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $300,000 be made available for the design of this
facility.
Armed Forces Reserve Center, Bergstrom AFB, TX.--Of the
$22,232,000 provided for planning and design within the ``Army
National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $2,000,000 be made available for the design of an Armed
Forces Reserve Center.
Expand arm/dearm area, Great Falls, MT.--Of the $8,000,000
provided for unspecified minor construction within the ``Air
National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $1,400,000 be made available for the construction of this
facility.
Arm/dearm pads, Hector IAP, ND.--Of the $8,000,000 provided
for unspecified minor construction within the ``Air National
Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less than
$900,000 be made available for the construction of this
facility
Aviation support facility, Burlington IAP, VT.--Of the
$22,232,000 provided for planning and design within the ``Army
National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $2,000,000 be made available for the design of this
facility.
Pararescue training complex, Kulis ANGB, AK.--Of the
$19,119,000 provided for planning and design within the ``Air
National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $650,000 be made available for the design of this
replacement facility.
Simulation training center, Newington, NH.--Of the
$19,119,000 provided for planning and design within the ``Air
National Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less
than $250,000 be made available for the design of this
facility.
Controlled humidity storage complex, Gulfport CB Base,
MS.--Of the $11,200,000 provided for planning and design within
the ``Army Reserve'' account, the Committee directs that not
less than $3,000,000 be made available for the design of this
facility.
Scout armories, AK.--Of the $12,775,000 provided for
unspecified minor construction within the ``Army National
Guard'' account, the Committee directs that not less than
$1,500,000 be made available for the construction of Scout
armories in Scammon Bay, Kasigluk and Chevak, Alaska.
Idaho National Guard facilities.--The Committee recognizes
the growing reliance on the National Guard and Reserve to
support ongoing peace keeping operations such as those
contingents in Kosovo and Bosnia. The Committee also recognizes
that such operations place considerable strain on the National
Guard and Reserve. Military Construction plays an important
role in improving operational conditions and quality-of-life.
The Idaho National Guard faces a significant shortage in
readiness space at its facilities at Gowen Field. This shortage
could impact readiness and the ability of the Idaho National
Guard to effectively and efficiently prepare for deployment.
The Mobilization Readiness Center modifications and additions
are needed to provide space for Army Guard units currently
located in World War II-era buildings or other facilities that
are overcrowded and inadequate for that purpose. The Committee
urges the National Guard Bureau to place this project in the
FYDP at the earliest practicable date.

North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program

Appropriations, 2000.................................... $81,000,000
Budget estimate, 2001................................... 190,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 175,000,000

The Committee has provided $175,000,000 for the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization [NATO] Security Investment Program
for fiscal year 2001. This amount is $15,000,000 below the
President's fiscal year 2001 budget request and an increase of
$94,000,000 above the appropriation for fiscal year 2000. The
Comittee is aware of the unobligated balances in this account.
The Committee notes that the actual fiscal year 2000
requirement for the NATO security investment program was
$191,000,000. Sufficient funding for the account was provided
by funds appropriated in the Fiscal Year 1999 Emergency
Supplemental Appropriations Act (Public Law 106-31).
The Committee continues the requirement that no funds will
be used for projects (including planning and design) related to
the enlargement of NATO and the Partnership for Peace program,
unless Congress is notified 21 days in advance of the
obligation of funds. In addition, the Committee's intent is
that section 121 of the General Provisions shall apply to this
program.
The Department of Defense is directed to identfy separately
the level of effort anticipated for NATO enlargement and for
Partnership for Peace for that fiscal year in future budget
justifications.

Family Housing Overview

The Committee has provided $3,546,809,000 for family
housing construction, operations and maintenance, and the
Department's family housing improvements fund. This amount is
$66,328,000 above the fiscal year 2001 budget request and
$64,032,000 below the amount appropriated in fiscal year 2000.

CONTRACTOR SUPPORT FOR FAMILY HOUSING PRIVATIZATION

The Committee is very concerned to learn that the Army is
spending excessive amounts on contractor support to evaluate
and develop family housing privatization proposals. The Army's
expenditures on this initiative far exceed the other military
services for family housing privatization. The realignment of
fiscal year 2000 Army Family Housing Operation funds to the
Residential Communities Initiative (RCI), has negatively
impacted family housing operations worldwide. The Committee
wants to ensure the Department understands its position with
respect to these costs.
Section 2883 of 10 U.S.C. provides the authority to
transfer Family Housing Construction funds into the Family
Housing Improvement Fund (FHIF) to finance a privatization
deal. This section also provides authority to use Family
Housing Operation and Maintenance funds to develop, evaluate,
and oversee a privatization deal. While the Military
Construction appropriations' language specifies that the FHIF
is the sole source of funds for the administration and
oversight of privatization efforts, this language is intended
to limit the funds spent to operate the Competitive Sourcing
and Privatization Directorate, formerly known as the Housing
Revitalization Support Office (HRSO).
In the future, all privatization deals will be financed as
currently authorized, i.e., Family Housing Construction funds
will be transferred into the FHIF to finance privatization
deals and the amounts appropriated into the FHIF will be the
sole source of funds to finance the operation of the
Competitive Sourcing and Privatization Directorate. Family
Housing Operations and Maintenance will be the sole source of
funds to develop, evaluate and oversee privatization deals and
pay consultants; however, these funds will be separately
identified and justified as a sub-element of the Family Housing
Operation account similar to management. Further, this sub-
element is considered a congressional interest item and may not
be increased from the amount enacted without prior approval of
the congressional appropriations committees.

Family Housing, Army

Appropriations, 2000.................................... $1,167,012,000
Budget estimate, 2001................................... 1,140,381,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,179,470,000

The Committee recommends a total of $1,179,470,000 for
family housing, Army, in fiscal year 2001. This is $39,089,000
over the fiscal year 2001 budget request.

construction

The Committee recommends $150,974,000 for new construction
instead of $91,974,000 as requested, as shown below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location/project Requested Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alaska: Fort Wainwright (75 units)...... .............. $24,000,000
Arizona: Fort Huachuca (110 units)...... $16,224,000 16,224,000
Hawaii: Schofield Barracks (72 units)... 15,500,000 15,500,000
Kentucky:
Fort Campbell (56 units)............ 7,800,000 7,800,000
Fort Campbell (128 units)........... .............. 20,000,000
Maryland: Fort Detrick (48 units)....... 5,600,000 5,600,000
North Carolina: Fort Bragg (112 units).. 14,600,000 14,600,000
South Carolina: Fort Jackson (1 unit)... 250,000 250,000
Texas:
Fort Bliss (64 units)............... 10,200,000 10,200,000
Fort Sam Houston (70 units)......... .............. 10,000,000
Korea: Camp Humphreys (60 units)........ 21,800,000 21,800,000
Puerto Rico: Fort Buchanan (31 units)... .............. 5,000,000
-------------------------------
Total............................... 91,974,000 150,974,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Construction Improvements

The following projects are to be accomplished within the
amounts provided for construction improvements:

Location/installation/project Recommended
Alaska: Fort Wainwright (28 units)...................... $7,200,000
District of Columbia: Fort McNair (8 units)............. 1,300,000
New York: West Point (59 units)......................... 9,100,000
Virginia: Fort Belvoir (148 units)...................... 14,000,000
Germany:
Ansbach (42 units).................................. 4,200,000
Heidelberg (276 units).............................. 8,200,000
Wiesbaden (144 units)............................... 13,200,000
Wuerzburg (64 units)................................ 6,300,000
Korea: Yongsan (1 unit)................................. 90,000
--------------------------------------------------------
____________________________________________________
Total............................................. 63,590,000

Family Housing, Navy and Marine Corps

Appropriations, 2000.................................... $1,232,541,000
Budget estimate, 2001................................... 1,245,460,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,274,332,000

The Committee recommends $1,274,332,000 for family housing,
Navy and Marine Corps, in fiscal year 2001. This amount is
$28,872,000 over the fiscal year 2001 budget request.

construction

The Committee recommends $188,760,000 for new construction
instead of $159,317,000 as requested, as shown below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location/project Requested Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
California:
Lemoore Naval Air Station (160 $27,768,000 $27,768,000
units).............................
Twentynine Palms (79 units)......... 13,923,000 13,923,000
Hawaii:
Pearl Harbor Naval Complex (98 22,230,000 22,230,000
units).............................
Pearl Harbor Naval Complex (62 14,237,000 14,237,000
units).............................
Pearl Harbor Naval Complex (112 23,654,000 23,654,000
units).............................
Kaneohe Bay Marine Corp Base (84 21,910,000 21,910,000
units).............................
Maine: Brunswick Naval Air Station (168 18,722,000 18,722,000
units).................................
Mississippi: Pascagoula Naval Station .............. 21,605,000
(140 units)............................
North Carolina: Camp Lejuene (149 units) .............. 7,838,000
Washington: Whidbey Island Naval Air 16,873,000 16,873,000
Station (98 units).....................
-------------------------------
Total............................. 159,317,000 188,760,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS

The following projects are to be accomplished within the
amounts provided for construction improvements:

Location/installation/project Recommended
California:
NB San Diego: Murphy Canyon, Phs 4 (347 units)...... $27,123,000
MCB Camp Pendleton: San Onofre Housing Area (332
units)............................................ 24,969,000
Connecticut: NSB New London:
Nautilus Park I, Phs I (111 units).................. 10,429,000
Nautilus Park 2, Phs 4 (184 units).................. 18,694,000
Hawaii: CNB Pearl Harbor: Hale Allii (12 units)......... 2,729,000
Illinois: NTC Great Lakes: Forrestal Village, Phs 10
(180 units)......................................... 23,293,000
Maryland:
NAVCAD Annapolis: Academy Yard (7 units)............ 2,654,000
NAS Patuxent River: Solomon's Annex (17 units)...... 822,000
New Jersey: NAES Lakehurst: Pinehurst Estates, Phs I (72

units).............................................. 7,759,000
Tennessee: NAS Memphis: Wherry Housing (250 units)...... 10,892,000
Virginia:
Hampton Roads Little Creek: Shelton/Gela Point (308
units)............................................ 18,617,000
Hampton Roads Stanley Court: Stanley Court (125
units)............................................ 9,318,000
Washington: NAS Whidbey Island: Maylor/Faf Phs I (28
units).............................................. 1,851,000
Washington, DC: Marine Barracks, 8th & I:
ACMC Quarters (1 unit).............................. 223,000
Quarters #2 (1 unit)................................ 178,000
Quarters #4 (1 unit)................................ 190,000
Quarters #6 (1 unit)................................ 500,000
Iceland: NAS Keflavik (44 units)........................ 9,016,000
Japan:
PWC Yokosuka: Towers 5 & 6 (96 units)............... 11,884,000
MCAS Iwakuni:
3 Midrises (132 units).......................... 873,000
Midrise 955 (44 units).......................... 2,033,000
--------------------------------------------------------
____________________________________________________
Total......................................... 184,047,000

Family Housing, Air Force

Appropriations, 2000.................................... $1,167,848,000
Budget estimate, 2001................................... 1,049,754,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,048,121,000

The Committee recommends $1,048,121,000 for family housing,
Air Force, in fiscal year 2001, which is $1,633,000 below the
budget request.

construction

The Committee recommends $47,275,000 for new construction,
instead of $36,677,000 as requested, as shown below:

construction improvements

The following projects are to be accomplished within the
amounts provided for construction improvements:

Fiscal year 2001 MFH improvement program

State/installation/project Recommended
Alaska: Elmendorf AFB: Improve Electrical System........ $1,127,000
Arizona: Luke AFB: Improve Electrical System............ 1,109,000
Arkansas: Little Rock AFB: Privatize Family Housing
(1,535
Units).............................................. 2,000,000
California: Vandenberg AFB: Privatize Family Housing
(506
Units).............................................. 7,013,000
Colorado: Peterson AFB: Improve Neighborhood............ 721,000
District of Columbia: Bolling AFB: Improve Family
Housing (22 Units).................................. 216,000
Georgia: Moody AFB: Privatize Family Housing (696 Units) 8,401,000
Louisiana: Barksdale AFB: Improve Water Supply System... 513,000
Massachusetts: Hanscom AFB: Improve Utility System...... 711,000
Missouri: Whiteman AFB: Improve Storm Drainage.......... 470,000
Nebraska: Offutt AFB: Privatize Family Housing (2,580
Units).............................................. 14,982,000
North Carolina: Pope AFB: Improve Infrastructure........ 919,000
North Dakota: Cavalier AFS: Improve Family Housing (12
Units).............................................. 426,000
Oklahoma: Tinker AFB: Improve Family Housing (144 Units) 7,741,000
South Carolina: Charleston AFB: Privatize Family Housing
(488 Units)......................................... 2,000,000
Tennessee: Arnold AFS: Improve Family Housing (40 Units) 1,007,000
Utah: Hill AFB:
Privatize Family Housing (1, 116 Units)............. 11,271,000
Improve Family Housing (8 Units).................... 1,011,000
Germany:
Ramstein AB: Improve Family Housing (434 Units)..... 45,813,000
Spangdahlem AB: Improve Family Housing (162 Units).. 15,342,000
Japan: Kadena AB: Improve Family Housing (52 Units)..... 9,074,000
Korea: Osan AB: Improve Family Housing (10 Units)....... 2,169,000
United Kingdom:
RAF Fairford: improve Family Housing (106 Units).... 10,923,000
RAF Lakenheath: Improve Family Housing (158 Units).. 15,910,000
RAF Molesworth: Improve Family Housing (130 Units).. 13,177,000
--------------------------------------------------------
____________________________________________________
Total............................................. 174,046,000

Family Housing, Defense-wide

Appropriations, 2000.................................... $41,440,000
Budget estimate, 2001................................... 44,886,000
Committee recommendation................................ 44,886,000

The Committee recommends $44,886,000 for family housing,
defense-wide, in fiscal year 2001. This amount is equal to the
budget request. Specific details are included in the tables at
the end of the report.

Family Housing Improvement Fund

Appropriations, 2000.................................... $2,000,000
Budget estimate, 2001...................................................
Committee recommendation................................................

The Committee recommends no funding for the family housing
privatization fund in fiscal year 2001 consistent with the
budget request.

Homeowners Assistance Fund, Defense

Appropriations, 2000....................................................
Budget estimate, 2001...................................................
Committee recommendation................................................

The Committee recommends no appropriation for the
Homeowners Assistance Fund. This is equal to the budget request
for fiscal year 2001, and equal to the appropriation for fiscal
year 2000. Requirements for fiscal year 2000 were financed by a
prior year carryover, revenue, and transfers from other
accounts.
The Homeowners Assistance Fund is a non-expiring revolving
fund which finances a program for providing assistance to
homeowners by reducing their losses incident to the disposal of
their homes when military installations at or near where they
are serving or employed are ordered to be closed or the scope
of operations is reduced. The Fund was established in
recognition of the fact that base closure and reduction actions
can have serious economic effects on local communities. The
Fund receives funding from several sources: appropriations,
borrowing authority, reimbursable authority, prior fiscal year
unobligated balances, revenue from sale of acquired properties,
and recovery of prior year obligations.
The total estimated requirements for fiscal year 2001 are
estimated at $29,323,000 and will be funded with transfers from
the Base Realignment and Closure account, revenue from sales of
acquired property, and prior year unobligated balances.

Base Realignment and Closure

Overview

The Congress has appropriated, to date, a net total of
$20,362,218,000 for the Base Realignment and Closure program
for fiscal years 1990 through 2000. In the bill for fiscal year
2001, the Committee is recommending total funding of
$1,174,369,000 under one account, as requested. These funds are
necessary to ensure closure schedules can be met and
anticipated savings will be realized. In addition, funding is
essential for accelerated cleanup which is necessary for reuse
of surplus properties and future job creation.
The Committee, in appropriating such funds, has provided
the Department with the flexibility to allocate funds by
Service, by function and by base. The Committee, in recognizing
the complexities of realigning and closing bases and providing
for environmental restoration, has provided such flexibility to
allow the Office of the Secretary of Defense to monitor the
program execution of the Services and to redistribute
unobligated balances as appropriate to avoid delays and to
effect timely execution of realignment and closures along with
environmental restoration.
The following table displays the total amount appropriated
for each round of base closure including amounts recommended
for fiscal year 2001:

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE
[Total funding, fiscal year 1990 through fiscal year 2001]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal year 1990
through fiscal Fiscal year 2000 Fiscal year 2001 Total recommended
year 1999 enacted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part I.............................. $2,684,577,000 NA NA $2,684,577,000
Part II............................. 4,915,636,000 NA NA 4,915,636,000
Part III............................ 7,269,267,000 NA NA 7,269,267,000
Part IV............................. 4,820,427,000 $672,311,000 $1,174,369,000 6,667,107,000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total......................... 19,689,907,000 672,311,000 1,174,369,000 21,536,587,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NA: Not applicable.

Since the start of the current process for Base Realignment
and Closure, Military Construction Appropriations Acts have
appropriated a net total of $20,362,218,000 for the entire
program for fiscal years 1990 through 2000. Within this total,
the Department has allocated $5,994,179,000 for activities
associated with environmental restoration. The total amount
appropriated combined with the budget requested for fiscal year
2001 Base Realignment and Closure is a total of
$21,536,587,000.

Base Realignment and Closure Account, Part IV

Appropriations, 2000.................................... $672,311,000
Budget estimate, 2001................................... 1,174,369,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,174,369,000

The Committee recommends $1,174,369,000 for the base
realignment and closure account, part IV. This is an increase
of $502,058,000 from the amount appropriated for fiscal year
2000 but equal to the budget request. The Committee notes
assurances from the Department that the requested amount is
adequate to fully execute the requirements for the program in
the coming fiscal year with no impact on meeting the targeted
BRAC completion date of July 13, 2001.

DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE TASK FORCE

The Defense Environmental Response Task Force (DERTF) was
established in fiscal year 1991 to report on ways to improve
interagency coordination and to improve and streamline policies
and procedures relating to environmental response actions at
closing installations. Since all closures resulting from
Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission decisions will
be completed by July 13, 2001, the Committee believes that the
mission of the DERTF will be completed by that time and that no
further meetings of the DERTF are necessary.

GENERAL PROVISIONS

The following lists general provisions proposed by the
Committee. The Committee recommends inclusion of several
proposals which have been incorporated in previous
appropriations acts, provisions requested by the Defense
Department, and new provisions. The Committee recommendations
are as follows:
Sec. 101. Restricts payments under a cost-plus-a-fixed-fee
contract for work, except in cases of contracts for
environmental restoration at base closure sites.
Sec. 102. Permits use of funds for hire of passenger motor
vehicles.
Sec. 103. Permits use of funds for defense access roads.
Sec. 104. Prohibits construction of new bases inside the
continental United States for which specific appropriations
have not been made.
Sec. 105. Limits the use of funds for purchase of land or
land easements.
Sec. 106. Prohibits the use of funds to acquire land,
prepare a site, or install utilities for any family housing
except housing for which funds have been made available.
Sec. 107. Limits the use of minor construction funds to
transfer or relocate activities among installations.
Sec. 108. Prohibits the procurement of steel unless
American producers, fabricators, and manufacturers have been
allowed to compete.
Sec. 109. Prohibits payments of real property taxes in
foreign nations.
Sec. 110. Prohibits construction of new bases overseas
without prior notification.
Sec. 111. Establishes a threshold for American preference
of $500,000 relating to architect and engineering services.
Sec. 112. Establishes preference for American contractors
for military construction in the United States territories and
possessions in the Pacific, and on Kwajalein Atoll, or in the
Arabian Gulf.
Sec. 113. Requires notification of military exercises
involving construction in excess of $100,000.
Sec. 114. Limits obligations during the last 2 months of
the year.
Sec. 115. Permits funds appropriated in prior years to be
available for construction authorized during the current
session of Congress.
Sec. 116. Permits the use of expired or lapsed funds to pay
the cost of supervision for any project being completed with
lapsed funds.
Sec. 117. Permits obligation of funds from more than 1
fiscal year to execute a construction project, provided that
the total obligation for such project is consistent with the
total amount appropriated for the project.
Sec. 118. Allows expired funds to be transferred to the
``Foreign currency fluctuations, construction, defense''
account.
Sec. 119. Directs the Department to report annually on
actions taken to encourage other nations to assume a greater
share of the common defense budget.
Sec. 120. Allows transfer of proceeds from ``Base
realignment and closure accounts, part I'' to the continuing
base realignment and closure accounts.
Sec. 121. Restricts the use of funds for the Partnership
for Peace Program.
Sec. 122. Requires the Secretary of Defense to notify the
congressional defense committees of all family housing
privatization solicitations and agreements which contain any
clause providing consideration for base realignment and
closure, force reductions and extended deployments.
Sec. 123. Provides transfer authority to the Homeowners
Assistance Program.
Sec. 124. Requires that all Military Construction
Appropriations Acts be the sole funding source of all operation
and maintenance for family housing, including flag and general
officer quarters, and limits the repair on flag and general
officer quarters to $25,000 per year without prior notification
to the defense committees.
Sec. 125. Rescinds unobligated balances within military
construction and family housing appropriations.
Sec. 126. Provides transfer authority to the Navy regarding
a military construction project at NAS Memphis, TN.
Sec. 127. Provides additional authority to the Army
concerning a fiscal year 1997 military construction project.

COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7, RULE XVI, OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE

Paragraph 7 of rule XVI requires that Committee reports on
general appropriations bills identify each Committee amendment
to the House bill ``which proposes an item of appropriation
which is not made to carry out the provisions of an existing
law, a treaty stipulation, or an act or resolution previously
passed by the Senate during that session.''
Due to the early Committee action on the fiscal year 2001
Military Construction appropriations bill, an original Senate
bill was reported by the Appropriations Committee to the
Senate.
The Committee has acted in good faith in its attempt to
comply fully with requirements stipulated under paragraph 7,
rule XVI.
The Committee anticipates that Congress will authorize the
amounts appropriated in this act.

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee Change from
Installation and project Budget recommen- budget
request dation estimate
------------------------------------------------------------------------

ALABAMA

ARMY: REDSTONE ARSENAL: SPACE 23,400 39,000 +15,600
AND MISSILE DEFENSE COMMAND
BUILDING.....................
AIR FORCE: MAXWELL AFB: 3,825 3,825 ............
OFFICER TRAINING SCHOOL
ACADEMIC FACIL- ITY.........
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, ALABAMA.......... 27,225 42,825 +15,600

ALASKA

ARMY: FORT RICHARDSON: CENTRAL 3,000 3,000 ............
VEHICLE WASH FACILITY........
AIR FORCE:
CAPE ROMANZOV LONG RANGE 3,900 3,900 ............
RADAR SITE: GENERATOR
FUEL STORAGE.............
EIELSON AFB:
DORMITORY (120 RM).... 14,540 14,540 ............
HAZARDOUS MATERIAL 1,450 1,450 ............
STORAGE..............
JOINT MOBILITY COMPLEX ............ 25,000 +25,000
ELMENDORF AFB:
CHILD DEVELOPMENT ............ 7,666 +7,666
CENTER...............
DORMITORY (144 RM).... 15,920 15,920 ............
UPGRADE HANGAR COMPLEX 11,600 11,600 ............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: KULIS ............ 12,000 +12,000
ANGB: CORRISION CONTROL
FACILITY.....................
DEFENSE-WIDE: FORT WAINWRIGHT: 44,000 44,000 ............
HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT (PHASE
II)..........................
NAVY RESERVE: ELMENDORF AFB: 6,403 6,403 ............
MARINE CORPS RESERVE TRAINING
CENTER.......................
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, ALASKA........... 100,813 145,479 +44,666

ARIZONA

ARMY: FORT HUACHUCA: FIELD 1,250 1,250 ............
OPERATIONS FACILITY..........
NAVY:
CAMP NAVAJO NAVY 2,940 2,940 ............
DETACHMENT: MAGAZINE
MODERNIZATION............
YUMA MARINE CORPS AIR 8,200 8,200 ............
STATION: COMBAT AIRCRAFT
LOADING APRON............
AIR FORCE: DAVIS MONTHAN AFB: 7,900 7,900 ............
FITNESS CENTER...............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, ARIZONA.......... 20,290 20,290 ............

ARKANSAS

ARMY:
PINE BLUFF ARSENAL:
AMMUNITION 43,600 ............ -43,600
DEMILITARIZATION
FACILITY (PHASE V)...
CHEMICAL DEFENSE 15,500 18,000 +2,500
QUALIFICATION
FACILITY (PHASE I)...
AIR FORCE:
LITTLE ROCK AFB:
C-130 SQUADRON 7,960 7,960 ............
OPERATIONS/AIRCRAFT
MAINT UNIT...........
EASEMENT BLACKJACK ............ 1,259 +1,259
DROP ZONE............
FITNESS CENTER........ 9,100 9,100 ............
DEFENSE-WIDE: PINE BLUFF ............ 43,600 +43,600
ARSENAL: AMMUNITION
DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY
(PHASE V)....................
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
FORT SMITH MAP:
OPERATION AND TRAINING ............ 7,200 +7,200
FACILITY.............
REGIONAL FIRE TRAINING 1,760 1,760 ............
FACILITY.............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, ARKANSAS..... 77,920 88,879 +10,959

CALIFORNIA

ARMY: FORT IRWIN: BARRACKS 31,000 31,000 ............
COMPLEX--NORTH...............
NAVY:
CAMP PENDLETON MARINE
CORPS BASE:
ARMOR/ANTI-ARMOR 4,100 4,100 ............
TRACKING RANGE.......
INFANTRY SQUADRON 4,000 4,000 ............
BATTLE COURSE........
LEMOORE NAVAL AIR STATION: 8,260 8,260 ............
BACHELOR ENLISTED
QUARTERS.................
MIRAMAR MARINE CORPS AIR 7,350 7,350 ............
STATION: GROUND COMBAT
TRAINING RANGE...........
NORTH ISLAND NAVAL AIR 12,800 12,800 ............
STATION: BERTHING WHARF
(INCREMENT II)..........
NORTH ISLAND NAVAL 4,340 4,340 ............
AVIATION DEPOT: COMPONENT
REPAIR CLEAN ROOM
FACILITY.................
PORT HUEMEME NAVAL SURFACE 10,200 10,200 ............
WARFARE CENTER: WEAPON/
COMBAT SYSTEM INTEG LAB..
POINT MUGU NAVAL AIR 11,400 11,400 ............
WARFARE CTR WPNS DIV: ADD/
ALTER RANGE OPERATIONS
CENTER...................
SAN CLEMENTE ISLAND NAVAL 8,860 8,860 ............
FACILITY: AIRCRAFT
OPERATIONS BUILDING......
SAN DIEGO NAVAL STATION: 35,700 35,700 ............
BERTHING PIER (INCREMENT
I).......................
TWENTYNINE PALMS: URBAN 2,100 2,100 ............
ASSAULT COURSE...........
AIR FORCE:
BEALE AFB:
CONTROL TOWER......... ............ 6,299 +6,299
WATER TREATMENT PLANT 3,800 3,800 ............
AND DISTRIBUTION LINE
LOS ANGELES AFB: FITNESS 6,580 6,580 ............
CENTER...................
VANDENBERG AFB: UPGRADE 4,650 4,650 ............
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
DEFENSE-WIDE:
CAMP PENDLETON MARINE
CORPS BASE:
FLEET HOSPITAL OPS/ 2,900 2,900 ............
TRAINING COMMAND
SUPPORT FAC..........
MEDICAL/DENTAL CLINIC 3,950 3,950 ............
REPLACEMENT (HORNO)..
MEDICAL/DENTAL CLINIC 3,550 3,550 ............
REPLACEMENT (LAS
FLORES)..............
MEDICAL/DENTAL CLINIC 3,750 3,750 ............
REPLACEMENT (LAS
PULGAS)..............
CORONADO NAVAL AMPHIBIOUS 4,300 4,300 ............
BASE: APPLIED INSTRUCTION
FACIL- ITY..............
NORTH ISLAND NAVAL AIR 5,900 5,900 ............
STATION: REPLACE FUEL
STORAGE TANKS............
TWENTYNINE PALMS MARINE 2,200 2,200 ............
CORPS AIR STATION: FUEL
STORAGE FACILITY.........
EDWARDS AFB: MEDICAL 17,900 17,900 ............
CLINIC ADDITION/DENTAL
CLINIC ALTERA- TION.....
NORTH ISLAND NAVAL AIR 1,350 1,350 ............
STATION: SMALL CRAFT
BERTHING FACIL- ITY.....
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
BAKERSFIELD: 1,380 ............ -1,380
ORGANIZATIONAL
MAINTENANCE SHOP.........
COLTON: ORGANIZATIONAL 489 ............ -489
MAINTENANCE SHOP.........
ESCONDIDO: ORGANIZATIONAL 1,380 ............ -1,380
MAINTENANCE SHOP.........
FRESNO: ORGANIZATIONAL 1,869 2,847 +978
MAINTENANCE SHOP.........
LOS ALAMITOS: 489 ............ -489
ORGANIZATIONAL
MAINTENANCE SHOP.........
PARKS: ORGANIZATIONAL ............ 6,062 +6,062
MAINTENANCE SHOP.........
RICHMOND: ORGANIZATIONAL 489 ............ -489
MAINTENANCE SHOP.........
SAN JOSE: ORGANIZATIONAL 1,869 ............ -1,869
MAINTENANCE SHOP.........
SAN MATEO: ORGANIZATIONAL 461 ............ -461
MAINTENANCE SHOP.........
SANTA BARBARA: 483 ............ -483
ORGANIZATIONAL
MAINTENANCE SHOP.........
NAVY RESERVE: ALAMEDA NAVAL 950 950 ............
AIR STATION: SEAWALL.........
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, CALIFORNIA....... 210,799 217,098 +6,299

COLORADO

ARMY: PUEBLO DEPOT ACTIVITY: 10,700 ............ -10,700
AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION
FACILITY (PHASE II)..........
AIR FORCE:
BUCKLEY AIR NATIONAL GUARD 2,750 2,750 ............
BASE: SPACE BASED
INFRARED SYSTEM POWER
CONNECTION...............
PETERSON AFB:
COMPUTER NETWORK ............ 6,826 +6,826
DEFENSE FACILITY.....
DORMITORY (144 RM).... 11,000 11,000 ............
OPERATIONS SUPPORT 2,260 2,260 ............
FACILITY.............
SCHRIEVER AFB: ADD TO 8,450 8,450 ............
OPERATIONAL SUPPORT
FACILITY.................
US AIR FORCE ACADEMY: ADD 18,960 18,960 ............
TO ATHLETIC FACILITY.....
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: BUCKLEY ............ 6,000 +6,000
AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE:
REPLACE JOINT MUNITIONS MAINT
AND STORAGE COMPLEX..........
DEFENSE-WIDE: PUEBLO DEPOT ............ 10,700 +10,700
ACTIVITY: AMMUNITION
DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY
(PHASE II)...................
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, COLORADO......... 54,120 66,946 +12,826

CONNECTICUT

NAVY: NEW LONDON NAVAL 3,100 3,100 ............
SUBMARINE BASE: DRYDOCK
SUPPORT FACIL- ITY..........
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: ORANGE AIR ............ 12,000 +12,000
NATIONAL GUARD STATION: AIR
CONTROL SQUADRON COMPLEX.....
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, CONNECTICUT...... 3,100 15,100 +12,000

DELAWARE

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: SMYRNA: ............ 7,020 +7,020
READINESS CENTER.............

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

NAVY:
WASHINGTON COMMANDANT 2,450 2,450 ............
NAVAL DISTRICT: NAVY
MUSEUM ANNEX.............
WASHINGTON MARINE 17,197 17,197 ............
BARRACKS: BACHELOR
ENLISTED QUARTERS........
AIR FORCE: BOLLING AFB: CHILD 4,520 4,520 ............
DEVELOPMENT CENTER...........
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, DISTRICT OF 24,167 24,167 ............
COLUMBIA...............

FLORIDA

NAVY:
FORT LAUDERDALE NAVAL 3,570 3,570 ............
SURFACE WARFARE CTR
DETACHMENT: SEAWALL AND
SHIP BERTHING FACILITY...
PANAMA CITY: AMPHIBIOUS ............ 9,960 +9,960
WARFARE INTEGRATION
FACILITY.................
WHITING FIELD NAVAL AIR
STATION:
JPATS T-6A GSE SUPPORT/ 3,900 3,900 ............
PAINT FACILITY.......
JPATS T-6A OPERATIONS/ 1,230 1,230 ............
MAINTENANCE FACILITY.
AIR FORCE:
EGLIN AFB:
PRECISION GUIDED 3,340 3,340 ............
MUNITIONS MAINTENANCE
FACILITY.............
UPGRADE DORMITORY (72 5,600 5,600 ............
RM)..................
EGLIN AUXILIARY FIELD 9:
DEFENSE ACCESS ROAD... 2,360 2,360 ............
UPGRADE ACCESS ROADS.. 5,600 5,600 ............
PATRICK AFB: DEFENSE EQUAL 12,970 12,970 ............
OPPORTUNITY MANAGEMENT
INSTITUTE FAC............
TYNDALL AFB:
F-22 ADD/ALTER 18,500 18,500 ............
MAINTENANCE FACILITY.
F-22 OPERATIONS 6,800 6,800 ............
FACILITY.............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
EGLIN AFB: ADD/ALTER 37,600 37,600 ............
HOSPITAL/LIFE SAFETY
UPGRADE..................
EGLIN AUXILIARY FIELD 9:
AGE MAINTENANCE 4,750 4,750 ............
DISPATCH COMPLEX.....
AIRFIELD READINESS 3,000 3,000 ............
IMPROVEMENTS.........
CORROSION CONTROL 8,100 8,100 ............
FACILITY.............
HOT CARGO PAD......... 7,354 7,354 ............
MACDILL AFB: REPLACE 16,956 16,956 ............
HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM......
PATRICK AFB: MEDICAL 2,700 2,700 ............
CLINIC...................
TYNDALL AFB: ADD/ALTER 7,700 7,700 ............
MEDICAL CLINIC...........
ARMY RESERVE: ORLANDO: ADD/ 17,953 17,953 ............
ALTER AFR CENTER/
ORGANIZATIONAL MAINT SHOP....
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, FLORIDA.......... 169,983 179,943 +9,960

GEORGIA

ARMY:
FORT BENNING:
BARRACKS COMPLEX 24,000 24,000 ............
(KELLEY HILL) (PHASE
III-B)...............
FIXED WING AIRCRAFT 15,800 15,800 ............
PARKING APRON........
FORT STEWART: BARRACKS 26,000 26,000 ............
COMPLEX (HUNTER AAF)
(PHASE I-C)..............
NAVY:
ALBANY MARINE CORPS 1,100 1,100 ............
LOGISTICS BASE: RENOVATE
VEHICLE STORAGE FACILITY.
KINGS BAY TRIDENT REFIT 5,200 5,200 ............
FACILITY: CONSOLIDATED
SANDBLAST/PAINT FACILITY.
AIR FORCE:
FORT STEWART: AIR SUPPORT 4,920 4,920 ............
OPERATIONS SQUADRON
FACILITY.................
MOODY AFB:
DORMITORY............. ............ 8,818 +8,818
WATER TREATMENT PLANT. 2,500 2,500 ............
WARNER ROBBINS ALC: AIRMEN ............ 4,095 +4,095
DINING FACILITY..........
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: ROBINS 8,500 8,500 ............
AFB: B-1 MUNITIONS
MAINTENANCE AND TRAINING
COMPLEX......................
NAVY RESERVE:
ATLANTA NAVAL AIR STATION:
BACHELOR ENLISTED ............ 5,970 +5,970
QUARTERS (PHASE I)...
FITNESS CENTER 2,650 2,650 ............
ADDITION.............
RESERVE TRAINING 1,769 1,769 ............
BUILDING ADDITION....
AIR FORCE RESERVE: DOBBINS 6,032 6,032 ............
AFB: C-130 ASSAULT STRIP.....
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, GEORGIA.......... 98,471 117,354 +18,883

HAWAII

ARMY:
POHAKULOA TRAINING RANGE: ............ 12,000 +12,000
SADDLE ACCESS ROAD.......
SCHOFIELD BARRACKS: 46,400 46,400 ............
BARRACKS COMPLEX (WILSON
STREET) (PHASE I-B)......
WHEELER ARMY AIR FIELD: 43,800 43,800 ............
BARRACKS COMPLEX.........
NAVY:
CAMP SMITH: CINCPAC 35,600 35,600 ............
HEADQUARTERS, INCREMENT
II.......................
FORD ISLAND: SEWER FORCE ............ 6,900 +6,900
MAIN.....................
KANEOHE BAY MARINE CORPS 18,400 18,400 ............
BASE: BACHELOR ENLISTED
QUAR- TERS..............
LUALUALEI NAVAL UNDERSEA 2,100 2,100 ............
WARFARE DETACHMENT:
CONSOLIDATED FLEET TEST
SUPPORT FACILITY.........
PEARL HARBOR FLEET AND 12,000 12,000 ............
INDUS SUPPLY CENTER:
WHARF UP- GRADE.........
PEARL HARBOR NAVAL
STATION:
BACHELOR ENLISTED 16,500 16,500 ............
QUARTERS.............
RELOCATE SEAL DELIVERY 14,200 14,200 ............
VEHICLE TEAM.........
AIR FORCE: HICKAM AFB: UPGRADE 4,620 4,620 ............
HANGAR COMPLEX...............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: MAUI: ............ 11,592 +11,592
READINESS CENTER.............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, HAWAII........... 193,620 224,112 +30,492

IDAHO

AIR FORCE: MOUNTAIN HOME AFB: 10,125 10,125 ............
ENHANCED TRAINING RANGE
(PHASE III).................
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: GOWEN ............ 9,000 +9,000
FIELD: C-130 ASSAULT STRIP...
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, IDAHO............ 10,125 19,125 +9,000

ILLINOIS

NAVY:
GREAT LAKES NAVAL TRAINING
CENTER:
PHYSICIAL TRAINING 35,000 35,000 ............
FACILITY.............
RECRUIT BARRACKS...... 37,000 37,000 ............
RECRUIT BARRACKS...... 37,700 37,700 ............
REPLACE TRAINING DRILL 11,700 11,700 ............
HALL.................
AIR FORCE: SCOTT AFB: 3,830 3,830 ............
MUNITIONS STORAGE/LAND
ACQUISITION..................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: DANVILLE: ............ 2,435 +2,435
READINESS CENTER.............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: SCOTT AFB: 1,500 1,500 ............
KC-135E FLIGHT TRAINING
FACILITY.....................
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, ILLINOIS......... 126,730 129,165 +2,435

INDIANA

ARMY: NEWPORT ARMY AMMUNITION 54,400 ............ -54,400
PLANT: AMMUNITION
DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY
(PHASE III)..................
DEFENSE-WIDE: NEWPORT ARMY ............ 54,400 +54,400
AMMUNITION PLANT: AMMUNITION
DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY
(PHASE III)..................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
DELPHI: ORGANIZATIONAL 1,563 1,563 ............
MAINTENANCE SHOP.........
ELKHART: ORGANIZATIONAL 2,322 2,322 ............
MAINTENANCE SHOP.........
LOGANSPORT: ORGANIZATIONAL 739 739 ............
MAINTENANCE SHOP.........
PLYMOUTH: ORGANIZATIONAL 951 951 ............
MAINTENANCE SHOP.........
SOUTH BEND: ORGANIZATIONAL 951 951 ............
MAINTENANCE SHOP.........
NAVY RESERVE: GRISSOM AFB: ............ 4,730 +4,730
RESERVE TRAINING FACILITY....
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, INDIANA.......... 60,926 65,656 +4,730

KANSAS

ARMY:
FORT RILEY:
ADVANCE WASTE WATER ............ 22,000 +22,000
TREATMENT FACILITY...
BARRACKS COMPLEX 15,000 15,000 ............
(INFANTRY DRIVE)
(PHASE I-C)..........
AIR FORCE: MCCONNELL AFB: ............ 2,100 +2,100
APPROACH LIGHTING SYSTEM.....
DEFENSE-WIDE: MCCONNELL AFB: 11,000 11,000 ............
HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM..........
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: KANSAS 641 641 ............
CITY: ORGANIZATIONAL
MAINTENANCE SHOP.............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: MCCONNELL ............ 1,550 +1,550
AFB: B-1 POWER CHECK PAD WITH
SOUND SUPPRESSOR.............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, KANSAS........... 26,641 52,291 +25,650

KENTUCKY

ARMY:
BLUEGRASS ARMY DEPOT: 8,500 ............ -8,500
AMMUNITION
DEMILITARIZATION SUPPORT
(PHASE II)...............
FORT CAMPBELL: BARRACKS 9,400 9,400 ............
COMPLEX (MARKET GARDEN
RD) (PHASE II-C).........
FORT KNOX: MULTI-PURPOSE 8,450 9,000 +550
DIGITAL TRAINING RANGE
(PHASE III)..............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
BLUEGRASS ARMY DEPOT: ............ 8,500 +8,500
AMMUNITION
DEMILITARIZATION SUPPORT
(PHASE II)...............
FORT CAMPBELL:
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 4,500 4,500 ............
COMPLEX..............
FLIGHT SIMULATOR 5,400 5,400 ............
FACILITY.............
TACTICAL EQUIPMENT 6,400 6,400 ............
COMPLEX..............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: FORT ............ 3,929 +3,929
KNOX: PARKING AT MATES.......
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, KENTUCKY......... 42,650 47,129 +4,479

LOUISIANA

AIR FORCE:
BARKSDALE AFB:
B-52H FUEL CELL ............ 14,074 +14,074
MAINTENANCE DOCK.....
DORMITORY (96 RM)..... 6,390 6,390 ............
ARMY RESERVE:
FORT POLK: ADD/ALTER USAR 9,912 9,912 ............
CENTER/ORGANIZATIONAL
MAINTENANCE SHOP/
EQUIPMENT CONCENTRATION
SITE.....................
NEW ORLEANS: USAR CENTER/ 10,375 10,375 ............
ORGANIZATIONAL
MAINTENANCE SHOP/UNHEATED
STORAGE..................
NAVY RESERVE:
NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY: ............ 1,670 +1,670
PHYSICAL FITNESS/
RECREATION AREA..........
NEW ORLEANS NAVAL AIR
STATION:
AIR PASSENGER TERMINAL 590 590 ............
WAREHOUSE ADDITION.... 800 800 ............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, LOUISIANA.... 28,067 43,811 +15,744

MAINE

NAVY:
BRUNSWICK NAVAL AIR 2,450 2,450 ............
STATION: AIRCRAFT DE-
ICING/RINSE FACIL- ITY..
PORTSMOUTH NAVAL SHIPYARD: ............ 4,960 +4,960
WATERFRONT CRANE RAIL
SYSTEM...................
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, MAINE............ 2,450 7,410 +4,960

MARYLAND

ARMY:
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND:
AMMUNITION 45,700 ............ -45,700
DEMILITARIZATION
FACILITY (PHASE II)..
MUNITIONS ASSESSMENT/ 3,100 ............ -3,100
PROCESSING SYSTEMS
FACILITY.............
FORT MEADE: BARRACKS...... ............ 19,000 +19,000
NAVY: INDIAN HEAD NAVAL 6,430 6,430 ............
EXPLOSIVE ORD TECH CTR: JOINT
SERVICE EOD EQUIPMENT SUPPORT
FACILITY.....................
DEFENSE-WIDE:
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND:
AMMUNITION ............ 45,700 +45,700
DEMILITARIZATION
FACILITY (PHASE II)..
MUNITIONS ASSESSMENT/ ............ 3,100 +3,100
PROCESSING SYSTEMS
FACILITY.............
PATUXENT RIVER NAVAL AIR 8,300 8,300 ............
STATION: REPLACE
OPERATING FUEL TANKS.....
FORT MEADE:
CRITICAL UTILITY 769 769 ............
CONTROL (PHASE II)...
ROUTE 32.............. 3,459 3,459 ............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, MARYLAND..... 67,758 86,758 +19,000

MASSACHUSETTS

AIR FORCE: HANSCOM AFB: ............ 17,845 +17,845
RENOVATE ACQUISITION MGMT
FACILITY (PHASE II)..........

MICHIGAN

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
LANSING: COMBINED ............ 22,743 +22,743
MAINTENANCE SHOP (PHASE
I).......................
AUGUSTA: ORGANIZATIONAL ............ 3,600 +3,600
MAINTENANCE SHOP.........
MIDLAND: ORGANIZATIONAL 3,600 ............ -3,600
MAINTENANCE SHOP.........
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
ALPENA COUNTY REGIONAL 4,500 4,500 ............
AIRPORT: REPLACE
OPERATIONS AND TRAINING
COMPLEX..................
SELFRIDGE ANGB: UPGRADE ............ 18,000 +18,000
RUNWAY...................
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, MICHIGAN......... 8,100 48,843 +40,743

MINNESOTA

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
CAMP RIPLEY: COMBINED ............ 10,368 +10,368
SUPPORT MAINTENANCE SHOP.
MANKATO: READINESS CENTER. 4,681 4,681 ............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, MINNESOTA........ 4,681 15,049 +10,368

MISSISSIPPI

NAVY:
MERIDIAN NAVAL AIR
STATION:
CONTROL TOWER......... ............ 1,530 +1,530
T-45 AIRCRAFT SUPPORT 4,700 4,700 ............
FACILITIES...........
STENNIS SPACE CENTER: ............ 6,950 +6,950
WARFIGHTING CENTER.......
AIR FORCE:
COLUMBUS AFB: CORROSION ............ 4,828 +4,828
CONTROL FACILITY.........
KEESLER AFB: TECHNICAL 15,040 15,040 ............
TRAINING FACILITY........
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: JACKSON 10,500 12,800 +2,300
INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT: C-17
CORROSION CONTROL/MAINTENANCE
HANGAR.......................
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, MISSISSIPPI...... 30,240 45,848 +15,608

MISSOURI

ARMY: FORT LEONARD WOOD: BASIC 38,600 38,600 ............
TRAINING COMPLEX (PHASE I-A).
AIR FORCE:
WHITEMAN AFB:
B-2 CONVENTIONAL 4,150 4,150 ............
MUNITIONS IGLOOS.....
B-2 MUNITIONS ASSEMBLY 7,900 7,900 ............
AREA.................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: ............ 4,225 +4,225
MARYVILLE: READINESS CENTER..
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, MISSOURI......... 50,650 54,875 +4,225

MONTANA

AIR FORCE:
MALMSTROM AFB:
CONVERT COMMERCIAL ............ 3,517 +3,517
GATE.................
HELICOPTER OPERATIONS ............ 2,362 +2,362
FACILITY.............
MINUTEMAN III MISSILE 5,300 5,300 ............
SERVICE FACILITY.....
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
BOZEMAN: READINESS CENTER. ............ 4,916 +4,916
HAVRE: ORGANIZATIONAL 461 461 ............
MAINTENANCE SHOP.........
KALISPELL: ORGANIZATIONAL 493 493 ............
MAINTENANCE SHOP.........
LIBBY: ORGANIZATIONAL 463 463 ............
MAINTENANCE SHOP.........
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, MONTANA.......... 6,717 17,512 +10,795

NEBRASKA

AIR FORCE: OFFUTT AFB: FIRE/ ............ 9,765 +9,765
CRASH RESCUE STATION.........
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
GERING: ORGANIZATIONAL 657 657 ............
MAINTENANCE SHOP.........
MEAD: ORGANIZATIONAL 714 714 ............
MAINTENANCE SHOP.........
NORTH PLATTE: 508 508 ............
ORGANIZATIONAL
MAINTENANCE SHOP.........
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEBRASKA......... 1,879 11,644 +9,765

NEVADA

NAVY: FALLON NAVAL AIR ............ 6,280 +6,280
STATION: CORROSION CONTROL
HANGAR.......................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: USP&FO;: ............ 4,472 +4,472
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING......
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: RENO-TAHOE ............ 5,000 +5,000
IAP: FUEL STORAGE COMPLEX....
DEFENSE-WIDE: FALLON NAVAL AIR 5,000 5,000 ............
STATION: REPLACE OPERATING
FUEL TANKS...................
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEVADA........... 5,000 20,752 +15,752

NEW HAMPSHIRE

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: PEASE ............ 4,000 +4,000
INTERNATIONAL TRADE PORT:
MEDICAL TRAINING FACILITY....
ARMY RESERVE: ROCHESTER: LAND 980 980 ............
ACQUISITION..................
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEW HAMPSHIRE.... 980 4,980 +4,000

NEW JERSEY

NAVY: EARLE NAVAL WEAPONS 2,420 2,420 ............
STATION: RECREATION CENTER...
AIR FORCE: MCGUIRE AFB: 9,772 9,772 ............
FITNESS CENTER...............
ARMY RESERVE: FORT DIX: ............ 9,975 +9,975
BARRACKS (PHASE I)...........
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEW JERSEY....... 12,192 22,167 +9,975

NEW MEXICO

AIR FORCE:
CANNON AFB: CONTROL TOWER. ............ 4,934 +4,934
HOLLOMAN AFB: REPAIR ............ 18,380 +18,380
BONITO PIPELINE..........
KIRTLAND AFB: FIRE/CRASH ............ 7,352 +7,352
RESCUE STATION...........
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEW MEXICO....... ............ 30,666 +30,666

NEW YORK

ARMY:
FORT DRUM: CONSOLIDATED 10,300 10,300 ............
SOLDIER SUPPORT CENTER
(PHASE II)...............
US MILITARY ACADEMY: CADET 13,600 13,600 ............
PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT
CENTER (PHASE II-A)......
DEFENSE-WIDE: FORT DRUM: 1,400 1,400 ............
VETERINARY TREATMENT FACILITY
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: HANCOCK 5,376 5,376 ............
FIELD: READINESS CENTER......
AIR FORCE RESERVE: NIAGARA AIR ............ 6,881 +6,881
RESERVE STATION: VISITING
AIRMEN QUARTERS (PHASE I)....
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEW YORK......... 30,676 37,557 +6,881

NORTH CAROLINA

ARMY:
FORT BRAGG:
AMMUNITION HOLDING 12,600 12,600 ............
AREA.................
BARRACKS COMPLEX 26,000 26,000 ............
(BUTNER ROAD) (PHASE
I)...................
BARRACKS COMPLEX 45,600 45,600 ............
(LONGSTREET ROAD)
(PHASE I)............
BARRACKS COMPLEX 38,600 38,600 ............
(TAGAYTAY STREET)
(PHASE II-B).........
SUNNY POINT MILITARY OCEAN 2,300 2,300 ............
TERMINAL: RAILROAD
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
FACILITY.................
NAVY:
CAMP LEJEUNE MARINE CORPS
BASE:
AMPHIB OPERATION/ 9,500 9,500 ............
MAINTENANCE STORAGE
COMPLEX..............
ARMORIES.............. 10,000 10,000 ............
BACHELOR ENLISTED 14,300 14,300 ............
QUARTERS.............
CHILD DEVELOPMENT 4,420 4,420 ............
CENTER...............
OPERATIONS/MAINTENANCE/ 3,650 3,650 ............
STORAGE FACILITY.....
CHERRY POINT MARINE CORPS 8,480 8,480 ............
AIR STATION: AIRCRAFT
HANGAR IMPROVEMENTS......
CHERRY POINT NAVAL 7,540 7,540 ............
AVIATION DEPOT: AIRCRAFT
STRIPPING FACILITY
ADDITION.................
NEW RIVER MARINE CORPS AIR
STATION:
AIRCRAFT RINSE 800 800 ............
FACILITY.............
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL 2,600 2,600 ............
TOWER................
AIR FORCE: POPE AFB: DANGEROUS 24,570 24,570 ............
CARGO PADS...................
DEFENSE-WIDE:
CAMP LEJEUNE MARINE CORPS 5,914 5,914 ............
BASE: RUSSELL ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL...................
CHERRY POINT MARINE CORPS 5,700 5,700 ............
AIR STATION: REPLACE FUEL
STORAGE TANKS............
FORT BRAGG: MEDIA 8,600 8,600 ............
OPERATIONS COMPLEX.......
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: FORT 8,709 8,709 ............
BRAGG: MILITARY EDUCATION
FACILITY (PHASE I)...........
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, NORTH CAROLINA... 239,883 239,883 ............

NORTH DAKOTA

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: WAHPETON: ............ 10,960 +10,960
ARMED FORCES READINESS CENTER
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, NORTH DAKOTA..... ............ 10,960 +10,960

OHIO

ARMY: COLUMBUS DEFENSE SUPPLY 1,832 1,832 ............
CENTER: MILITARY ENTRANCE
PROCESSING STATION...........
AIR FORCE: WRIGHT-PATTERSON 22,600 22,600 ............
AFB: REPLACE WEST RAMP (PHASE
I)...........................
NAVY RESERVE: COLUMBUS NAVAL ............ 7,080 +7,080
AND MARINE CORPS RESERVE
CENTER: CONSOLIDATED NAVY AND
MARINE CORPS AIR RESERVE CTR.
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, OHIO............. 24,432 31,512 +7,080

OKLAHOMA

ARMY: FORT SILL: TACTICAL ............ 10,100 +10,100
EQUIPMENT SHOP (PHASE II)....
AIR FORCE:
ALTUS AFB: C-17 CARGO ............ 2,939 +2,939
COMPARTMENT TRAINER......
TINKER AFB:
DEPOT CORROSION 12,380 12,380 ............
CONTROL STRIP
FACILITY.............
DORMITORY (96 RM)..... 5,800 5,800 ............
VANCE AFB: MAINTENANCE ............ 10,504 +10,504
HANGAR...................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: SAND ............ 13,530 +13,530
SPRINGS: ARMED FORCES RESERVE
CEN- TER....................
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, OKLAHOMA......... 18,180 55,253 +37,073

OREGON

ARMY: UMATILLA DEPOT ACTIVITY: 9,400 ............ -9,400
AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION
FACILITY (PHASE VI)..........
DEFENSE-WIDE: UMATILLA DEPOT ............ 9,400 +9,400
ACTIVITY: AMMUNITION
DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY
(PHASE VI)...................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: BAKER 3,122 3,122 ............
CITY: READINESS CENTER.......
NAVY RESERVE: PORTLAND 1,420 1,420 ............
INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT: ALTER
RESERVE CENTER/VEHICLE
MAINTENANCE FACILITY.........
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, OREGON........... 13,942 13,942 ............

PENNSYLVANIA

ARMY:
CARLISLE BARRACKS: 10,500 10,500 ............
ACADEMIC RESEARCH
FACILITY.................
NEW CUMBERLAND DEFENSE 3,700 3,700 ............
DISTRIBUTION CENTER:
MILITARY ENTRANCE
PROCESSING STATION.......
DEFENSE-WIDE:
SUSQUEHANNA DEFENSE
DISTRIBUTION DEPOT:
REPLACE CHILD 4,700 4,700 ............
DEVELOPMENT CENTER...
REPLACE CONTROLLED 13,000 13,000 ............
HUMIDITY WAREHOUSE...
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: FORT ............ 8,197 +8,197
INDIANTOWN GAP: REPAIR WASTE
TREATMENT PLANT SEWAGE LINE..
AIR FORCE RESERVE:
PITTSBURGH IAP: COMBAT ............ 3,105 +3,105
COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY..
WILLOW GROVE ARS: ALTER 2,400 2,400 ............
HANGAR AND FIRE
SUPPRESSION..............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, PENNSYLVANIA..... 34,300 45,602 +11,302

RHODE ISLAND

NAVY: NEWPORT DIVISION NAVAL 4,150 4,150 ............
UNDERSEA WARFARE CENTER:
SHORE BASED LAUNCH FACILITY..
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: QUONSET ............ 16,500 +16,500
STATE APT: MAINTENANCE HANGAR
AND SHOPS....................
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, RHODE ISLAND..... 4,150 20,650 +16,500

SOUTH CAROLINA

NAVY:
BEAUFORT MARINE CORPS AIR 3,140 3,140 ............
STATION: FLIGHTLINE FIRE
SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS......
PARRIS ISLAND MARINE CORPS 2,660 2,660 ............
RECRUIT DEPOT: FIELD
TRAINING COMPLEX.........
AIR FORCE:
CHARLESTON AFB:
BASE MOBILITY ............ 9,449 +9,449
WAREHOUSE............
C-17 ADD TO FLIGHT 2,500 2,500 ............
SIMULATOR FACILITY...
RUNWAY REPAIR......... ............ 10,289 +10,289
SHAW AFB: USCENTAF 2,850 2,850 ............
OPERATIONS WEATHER
SQUADRON FACILITY........
DEFENSE-WIDE: BEAUFORT MARINE 804 804 ............
CORPS AIR STATION: LAUREL BAY
PRIMARY SCHOOL CLASSROOM
ADDITION.....................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: LEESBURG ............ 5,682 +5,682
TRAINING CENTER:
INFRASTRUCTURE UPGRADES......
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, SOUTH CAROLINA... 11,954 37,374 +25,420

SOUTH DAKOTA

AIR FORCE: ELLSWORTH AFB: BASE ............ 10,290 +10,290
CIVIL ENGINEER COMPLEX (PHASE
I)...........................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: SIOUX ............ 4,818 +4,818
FALLS: CONSOLIDATED BARRACKS/
EDUCATION FACILITY...........
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, SOUTH DAKOTA..... ............ 15,108 +15,108

TENNESSEE

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: ............ 1,976 +1,976
HENDERSON: ORGANIZATIONAL
MAINTENANCE SHOP (PHASE I)...
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, TENNESSEE........ ............ 1,976 +1,976

TEXAS

ARMY:
FORT BLISS: RAILYARD 26,000 26,000 ............
INFRASTRUCTURE...........
FORT HOOD:
MULTI-PURPOSE DIGITAL 16,000 16,000 ............
TRAINING RANGE (PHASE
I)...................
RAILHEAD FACILITY 9,800 9,800 ............
(PHASE III)..........
RED RIVER ARMY DEPOT: 800 800 ............
AMMUNITION CONTAINER
COMPLEX..................
AIR FORCE:
DYESS AFB:
FITNESS CENTER........ ............ 12,813 +12,813
REALISTIC BOMBER 12,175 12,175 ............
TRAINING INITIATIVE..
LACKLAND AFB:
CHILD DEVELOPMENT ............ 4,830 +4,830
CENTER...............
DORMITORY (96 RM)..... 5,500 5,500 ............
ARMY RESERVE:
CAMP BULLIS: USAR CENTER/ 1,464 1,464 ............
UNHEATED STORAGE.........
FORT SAM HOUSTON: USAR 13,678 13,678 ............
CENTER/ORGANIZATIONAL
MAINTENANCE SHOP/
EQUIPMENT CONCENTRATION
SITE.....................
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: ELLINGTON ............ 10,000 +10,000
FIELD: REPLACE BASE SUPPLY
AND CIVIL ENGINEER COMPLEX...
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, TEXAS............ 85,417 113,060 +27,643

UTAH

AIR FORCE:
HILL AFB:
C-130 CORROSION 16,500 16,500 ............
CONTROL FACILITY
(WCF)................
DORMITORY............. ............ 11,550 +11,550
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: SALT LAKE 10,300 10,300 ............
CITY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT:
UPGRADE AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE
COMPLEX......................
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, UTAH............. 26,800 38,350 +11,550

VERMONT

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: BURLINGTON ............ 9,300 +9,300
IAP: AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE COM-
PLEX.......................

VIRGINIA

ARMY: FORT EUSTIS: AIRCRAFT ............ 4,450 +4,450
MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTION BLDG.
NAVY:
DAHLGREN NAVAL SURFACE
WARFARE CENTER:
INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY 11,300 11,300 ............
AND INFRASTRUCTURE...
JOINT WARFARE ANALYSIS ............ 19,400 +19,400
CENTER...............
LITTLE CREEK NAVAL 2,830 2,830 ............
AMPHIBIOUS BASE:
WATERFRONT OPERATIONS
BUILDING.................
NORFOLK NAVAL AIR STATION:
AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE 13,300 13,300 ............
HANGAR...............
AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE 11,800 11,800 ............
HANGAR...............
TAXIWAY EXTENSION AND 6,350 6,350 ............
LIGHTS...............
NORFOLK NAVAL STATION: 4,700 4,700 ............
PIER ENHANCEMENTS........
NORFOLK NAVAL SHIPYARD: 16,100 16,100 ............
BACHELOR ENLISTED
QUARTERS.................
OCEANA NAVAL AIR STATION: 5,250 5,250 ............
AIRFIELD IMPROVEMENTS....
QUANTICO MARINE CORPS 8,590 8,590 ............
COMBAT DEV COMMAND:
PHYSICAL TRAINING
FACILITY.................
WALLOPS ISLAND AEGIS 3,300 3,300 ............
COMBAT SYSTEMS CENTER:
SPY-1D TEST AND
EVALUATION FACILITY
ADDITION.................
AIR FORCE: LANGLEY AFB: 7,470 7,470 ............
DORMITORY (96 RM)............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
DAM NECK FLEET COMBAT 5,500 5,500 ............
TRAINING CENTER:
OPERATIONAL SUPPORT
FACILITY.................
RICHMOND DEFENSE SUPPLY 4,500 4,500 ............
CENTER: EMERGENCY
SERVICES FACILITY........
OCEANA NAVAL AIR STATION: 2,000 2,000 ............
REPLACE FUEL STORAGE TANK
LITTLE CREEK NAVAL 5,400 5,400 ............
AMPHIBIOUS BASE: AIR
OPERATIONS FACILITY......
OCEANA NAVAL AIR STATION: 3,400 3,400 ............
OPERATIONS SUPPORT
FACILITY.................
SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND ............ 2,303 +2,303
CLASSIFIED: UNIT TRAINING
FACIL- ITY..............
ARMY RESERVE: FORT A P HILL: 4,275 4,275 ............
USAR CENTER/ORGANIZATIONAL
MAINTENANCE SHOP/AREA
MAINTENANCE SUPPORT ACTIVITY.
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: ............ 1,175 +1,175
RICHLANDS: ORGANIZATIONAL
MAINTENANCE SHOP............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, VIRGINIA......... 116,065 143,393 +27,328

WASHINGTON

NAVY:
BANGOR NAVAL SUBASE:
STRATEGIC SECURITY ............ 4,600 +4,600
SUPPORT FACILITY.....
EXPLOSIVE HANDLING 1,400 1,400 ............
WHARF MODIFICATIONS..
BREMERTON NAVAL STATION: 38,000 38,000 ............
PIER REPLACEMENT
(INCREMENT I)............
EVERETT NAVAL STATION: ............ 5,500 +5,500
AQUATIC COMBAT TRAINING
FACILITY.................
PUGET SOUND NAVAL
SHIPYARD:
CHEMICAL METALLURGICAL 9,400 9,400 ............
LABORATORY...........
OILY WASTEWATER 6,600 6,600 ............
COLLECTION...........
AIR FORCE:
FAIRCHILD AFB: RUNWAY ............ 2,046 +2,046
CENTERLINE LIGHTS........
MCCHORD AFB:
C-17 ADD/ALTER NOSE 3,750 3,750 ............
DOCKS................
C-17 SQUADRON 6,500 6,500 ............
OPERATIONS/AIRCRAFT
MAINTENANCE UNIT.....
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
BREMERTON: READINESS 2,639 4,057 +1,418
CENTER...................
YAKIMA: READINESS CENTER.. 5,104 6,713 +1,609
ARMY RESERVE:
FORT LAWTON: TRANSFER..... ............ 3,400 +3,400
TACOMA: USAR CENTER/ 14,759 14,759 ............
ORGANIZATIONAL
MAINTENANCE SHOP/AREA
MAINTENANCE SUPPORT
ACTIVITY MARINE..........
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, WASHINGTON..... 88,152 106,725 +18,573

WEST VIRGINIA

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: YEAGER ............ 6,000 +6,000
ANGB: UPGRADE PARKING APRON/
TAXI- WAY...................
NAVY RESERVE: ELEANOR: RESERVE ............ 2,500 +2,500
CENTER.......................
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, WEST VIRGINIA.... ............ 8,500 +8,500

WYOMING

AIR FORCE:
FE WARREN AFB:
COMMAND AND CONTROL 10,200 10,200 ............
SUPPORT FACILITY.....
MINUTEMAN III MISSILE 15,520 15,520 ............
SERVICE COMPLEX......
UPGRADE STORM WATER ............ 10,394 +10,394
DRAINAGE.............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, WYOMING...... 25,720 36,114 +10,394

CONUS CLASSIFIED

AIR FORCE: CLASSIFIED 1,810 1,810 ............
LOCATION: SPECIAL TACTICAL
UNIT DETACHMENT FACILITY.....

CONUS VARIOUS

NAVY: CONUS VARIOUS: BACHELOR 11,500 11,500 ............
ENLISTED QUARTERS/DINING
FACILITY.....................

BAHRAIN ISLAND

NAVY: SOUTHWEST NAVAL 19,400 19,400 ............
ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT UNIT:
OPERATIONS CENTER............

CURACAO/ARUBA

DEFENSE-WIDE:
REINA BEATRIX
INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
(ARUBA):
AIRFIELD PAVEMENT/ 8,800 ............ -8,800
RINSE FACILITY.......
SQUADRON OPERATIONS/ 860 ............ -860
AIRCRAFT MAINT UNIT/
STORAGE..............
SMALL AIRCRAFT 590 ............ -590
MAINTENANCE HANGAR/
APRON................
HATO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
(CURACAO):
AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE 9,200 ............ -9,200
HANGAR/NOSE/DOCK/
APRON................
AIRFIELD PAVEMENT/ 29,500 ............ -29,500
RINSE FACILITY.......
MAINTENANCE FACILITIES 3,000 ............ -3,000
SQUADRON OPERATIONS/ 2,200 ............ -2,200
AIRCRAFT MAINT UNIT/
STORAGE..............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, CURACAO/ARUBA 54,150 ............ -54,150

DIEGO GARCIA

AIR FORCE: DIEGO GARCIA: 5,475 5,475 ............
MUNITIONS STORAGE IGLOOS.....

ECUADOR

DEFENSE-WIDE:
MANTA AIR BASE:
AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE 6,723 ............ -6,723
HANGAR/NOSE/DOCK/
APRON................
MAINTENANCE FACILITIES 4,900 ............ -4,900
RESCUE STATION........ 2,200 ............ -2,200
SQUADRON OPERATIONS/ 2,600 ............ -2,600
AIRCRAFT MAINT UNIT/
STORAGE..............
VISITING AIRMEN 4,650 ............ -4,650
QUARTERS/DINING
FACILITY.............
VISITING OFFICER 1,600 ............ -1,600
QUARTERS.............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, ECUADOR...... 22,673 ............ -22,673

GERMANY

ARMY:
BAMBERG:
BARRACKS COMPLEX 7,800 7,800 ............
(WARNER 7005)........
BARARCKS COMPLEX 3,850 3,850 ............
(WARNER 7041)........
DARMSTADT:
BARRACKS COMPLEX 5,700 5,700 ............
(CAMBRAI FRITSCH
4002)................
BARRACKS COMPLEX 5,600 5,600 ............
(KELLEY 4164)........
KAISERSLAUTERN: CHILD 3,400 3,400 ............
DEVELOPMENT CENTER.......
MANNHEIM: BARRACKS COMPLEX 4,050 4,050 ............
(COLEMAN II).............
DEFENSE-WIDE:
DARMSTADT: DARMSTADT...... 2,450 2,450 ............
HANAU: ARGONNER ELEMENTARY 1,026 1,026 ............
SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION
HOHENFELS: CONSTRUCT 13,774 13,774 ............
MIDDLE SCHOOL/HIGH SCHOOL
KITZINGEN: HEALTH/DENTAL 1,400 1,400 ............
CLINIC LIFE SAFETY
UPGRADE..................
KLEBER KASERNE: REGIONAL 7,500 7,500 ............
FINANCE CENTER...........
SCHWEINFURT: SCHWEINFURT 1,444 1,444 ............
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
CLASSROOM ADDITION.......
WIESBADEN AB: ADD/ALTER 7,187 7,187 ............
HEALTH/DENTAL CLINIC.....
WUERZBURG: WUERZBURG 1,798 1,798 ............
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
CLASSROOM ADDITION.......
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, GERMANY........ 66,979 66,979 ............

GUAM

DEFENSE-WIDE:
ANDERSEN AFB:
REPLACE FUEL STORAGE 16,000 16,000 ............
TANKS................
REPLACE HYDRANT FUEL 20,000 20,000 ............
SYSTEM...............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, GUAM......... 36,000 36,000 ............

ITALY

NAVY:
NAPLES NAVAL SUPPORT 15,000 15,000 ............
ACTIVITY: BACHELOR
ENLISTED QUARTERS........
SIGONELLA NAVAL AIR 32,029 32,029 ............
STATION: COMMUNITY
FACILITIES...............
AIR FORCE: AVIANO AIR BASE: 8,000 8,000 ............
DORMITORY (102 RM)...........
DEFENSE-WIDE:
SIGONELLA NAVAL AIR 16,300 16,300 ............
STATION: REPLACE BULK
FUEL STORAGE FACILITY....
NAPLES NAVAL SUPPORT 43,850 ............ -43,850
ACTIVITY: MEDICAL/DENTAL
FACILITY REPLACEMENT.....
SIGONELLA: SIGONELLA 971 971 ............
ELEMENTARY/HIGH SCHOOL
CLASSRM ADDITION.........
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, ITALY.......... 116,150 72,300 -43,850

JAPAN

DEFENSE-WIDE:
IWAKUNI MARINE CORPS AIR 22,400 22,400 ............
STATION: BULK FUEL
STORAGE TANKS............
MISAWA AB: BULK FUEL 26,400 26,400 ............
STORAGE TANKS............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, JAPAN............ 48,800 48,800 ............

KOREA

ARMY:
CAMP HUMPHREYS: BARRACKS 14,200 14,200 ............
COMPLEX..................
CAMP PAGE: BARRACKS 19,500 19,500 ............
COMPLEX..................
YONGPYONG: MOUT COLLECTIVE ............ 12,400 +12,400
TRAINING FACILITY........
AIR FORCE:
KUNSAN AIR BASE: UPGRADE 6,400 6,400 ............
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
OSAN AIR BASE:
DORMITORY (156RM)..... 11,348 11,348 ............
UPGRADE WATER 10,600 10,600 ............
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM..
DEFENSE-WIDE: TAEGU AB: 1,450 1,450 ............
TACTICAL EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE COM- PLEX.......
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, KOREA............ 63,498 75,898 +12,400

KWAJALEIN

ARMY: KWAJALEIN ATOLL: 18,000 ............ -18,000
UNACCOMPANIED PERSONNEL
HOUSING RENOVATION...........

PUERTO RICO

ARMY: FORT BUCHANAN: CHILD ............ 3,700 +3,700
DEVELOPMENT CENTER...........
DEFENSE-WIDE: ROOSEVELT ROADS 1,241 1,241 ............
NAVAL STATION: BOAT
MAINTENANCE FACILITY.........
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, PUERTO RICO...... 1,241 4,941 +3,700

SPAIN

AIR FORCE: ROTA: ENHANCE ROTA, 5,052 5,052 ............
VARIOUS FACILITIES...........

TURKEY

AIR FORCE: INCIRLIK AFB: FIRE 1,000 1,000 ............
TRAINING FACILITY............

UNITED KINGDOM

DEFENSE-WIDE:
ROYAL AIR FORCE 10,000 10,000 ............
MILDENHALL: REPLACE
HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM......
ROYAL AIR FORCE FELTWELL:
FELTWELL ELEMENTARY 1,287 1,287 ............
SCHOOL CLASSROOM
ADDITION.............
LAKENHEATH ELEMENTARY 3,086 3,086 ............
SCHOOL CLASSROOM
ADDITION.............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, UNITED 14,373 14,373 ............
KINGDOM............

NATO

NATO SECURITY INVESTMENT 190,000 175,000 -15,000
PROGRAM......................

WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED

ARMY:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE
LOCATIONS:
HOST NATION........... 22,600 22,600 ............
UNSPECIFIED MINOR 15,000 20,200 +5,200
CONSTRUCTION.........
PLANNING AND DESIGN... 72,106 84,706 +12,600
CLASSIFIED PROJECT.... 11,500 11,000 -500
FOREIGN CURRENCY ............ -635 -635
REDUCTION............
NAVY:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE
LOCATIONS:
DESIGN FUNDS.......... 63,335 71,000 +7,665
UNSPECIFIED MINOR 7,659 11,659 +4,000
CONSTRUCTION.........
FOREIGN CURRENCY ............ -2,889 -2,889
REDUCTION............
AIR FORCE:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE
LOCATIONS:
UNSPECIFIED MINOR 9,850 11,350 +1,500
CONSTRUCTION.........
PLANNING AND DESIGN... 54,237 69,337 +15,100
DEFENSE-WIDE:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE
LOCATIONS:
ENERGY CONSERVATION 33,570 ............ -33,570
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM..
UNSPECIFIED MINOR 1,500 1,500 ............
CONSTRUCTION DEFENSE
FINANCE AND
ACCOUNTING SERVICE...
CONTINGENCY 10,000 10,000 ............
CONSTRUCTION.........
FOREIGN CURRENCY ............ -7,115 -7,115
REDUCTION............
PLANNING AND DESIGN:
TRI-CARE 22,000 22,000 ............
MANAGEMENT
ACTIVITY.........
DEFENSE 6,786 6,786 ............
INTELLIGENCE
AGENCY...........
UNDISTRIBUTED..... 24,000 24,000 ............
NMD INITIAL 85,095 85,095 ............
DEPLOYMENT
FACILITIES (PHASE
I)...............
OFFICE OF 2,900 2,900 ............
SECRETARY OF
DEFENSE..........
SPECIAL OPERATIONS 3,790 3,790 ............
COMMAND..........
BALLISTIC MISSILE 14,729 14,729 ............
DEFENSE
ORGANIZATION.....
DEFENSE THREAT 2,600 2,600 ............
REDUCTION AGENCY.
DEFENSE LOGISTICS 1,800 1,800 ............
AGENCY...........
-----------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, 163,700 163,700 ............
PLANNING AND
DESIGN.........
UNSPECIFIED MINOR
CONSTRUCTION:
TRI-CARE 3,000 3,000 ............
MANAGEMENT
ACTIVITY.........
BALLISTIC MISSILE 3,694 3,694 ............
DEFENSE
ORGANIZATION.....
JOINT CHIEFS OF 6,196 6,196 ............
STAFF............
UNDISTRIBUTED..... 3,000 3,000 ............
-----------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, 15,890 15,890 ............
UNSPECIFIED
MINOR
CONSTRUCTION...
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE
LOCATIONS:
PLANNING AND DESIGN... 4,232 22,232 +18,000
UNSPECIFIED MINOR..... 2,295 12,775 +10,480
UNSPECIFIED MINOR- ............ 25,000 +25,000
WMDCST...............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE
LOCATIONS:
UNSPECIFIED MINOR 4,000 8,000 +4,000
CONSTRUCTION.........
UNSPECIFIED PLANNING 9,119 19,119 +10,000
AND DESIGN...........
ARMY RESERVE:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE
LOCATIONS:
PLANNING AND DESIGN... 6,400 11,200 +4,800
UNSPECIFIED MINOR 1,917 1,917 ............
CONSTRUCTION.........
NAVY RESERVE: UNSPECIFIED 1,521 2,000 +479
WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS: DESIGN
FUNDS........................
AIR FORCE RESERVE:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE
LOCATIONS:
PLANNING AND DESIGN... 2,304 3,000 +696
UNSPECIFIED MINOR 4,115 4,115 ............
CONSTRUCTION.........
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, WORLDWIDE 516,850 591,661 +74,811
UNSPECIFIED........

WORLDWIDE VARIOUS

NAVY: VARIOUS LOCATIONS: HOST 142 142 ............
NATION INFRASTR SUPP.........
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, WORLDWIDE VARIOUS 142 142 ............

FAMILY HOUSING, ARMY

ALASKA: FORT WAINWRIGHT (75 ............ 24,000 +24,000
UNITS).......................
ARIZONA: FORT HUACHUCA (110 16,224 16,224 ............
UNITS).......................
HAWAII: SCHOFIELD BARRACKS (72 15,500 15,500 ............
UNITS).......................
KENTUCKY:
FORT CAMPBELL (56 UNITS).. 7,800 7,800 ............
FORT CAMPBELL (128 UNITS). ............ 20,000 +20,000
MARYLAND: FORT DETRICK (48 5,600 5,600 ............
UNITS).......................
NORTH CAROLINA: FORT BRAGG 14,600 14,600 ............
(112 UNITS)..................
SOUTH CAROLINA: FORT JACKSON 250 250 ............
(1 UNIT).....................
TEXAS:
FORT BLISS (64 UNITS)..... 10,200 10,200 ............
FORT SAM HOUSTON (70 ............ 10,000 +10,000
UNITS)...................
KOREA: CAMP HUMPHREYS (60 21,800 21,800 ............
UNITS).......................
PUERTO RICO: FORT BUCHANAN (31 ............ 5,000 +5,000
UNITS).......................
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS..... 63,590 63,590 ............
PLANNING AND DESIGN........... 6,542 6,542 ............
-----------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION.. 162,106 221,106 +59,000
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:
FURNISHING ACCOUNT........ 44,374 44,374 ............
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT........ 90,286 90,286 ............
SERVICES ACCOUNT.......... 44,855 44,855 ............
UTILITIES................. 198,101 198,101 ............
MISCELLANEOUS............. 855 855 ............
LEASING................... 202,011 202,011 ............
MAINTENANCE............... 397,792 397,792 ............
INTEREST PAYMENT.......... 1 1 ............
FOREIGN CURRENCY REDUCTION ............ -19,911 -19,911
-----------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND 978,275 958,364 -19,911
MAINTENANCE............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING, 1,140,381 1,179,470 +39,089
ARMY...................
=========================================
FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY AND
MARINE CORPS

CALIFORNIA:
LEMOORE NAVAL AIR STATION 27,768 27,768 ............
(160 UNITS)..............
TWENTYNINE PALMS (79 13,923 13,923 ............
UNITS)...................
HAWAII:
PEARL HARBOR NAVAL COMPLEX 22,230 22,230 ............
(98 UNITS)...............
PEARL HARBOR NAVAL COMPLEX 14,237 14,237 ............
(62 UNITS)...............
PEARL HARBOR NAVAL COMPLEX 23,654 23,654 ............
(112 UNITS)..............
KANEOHE BAY MARINE CORPS 21,910 21,910 ............
BASE (84 UNITS)..........
MAINE: BRUNSWICK NAVAL AIR 18,722 18,722 ............
STATION (168 UNITS)..........
MISSISSIPPI: PASCAGOULA NAVAL ............ 21,605 +21,605
STATION (140 UNITS)..........
NORTH CAROLINA: CAMP LEJUENE ............ 7,838 +7,838
(149 UNITS)..................
WASHINGTON: WHIDBEY ISLAND 16,873 16,873 ............
NAVAL AIR STATION (98 UNITS).
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS..... 183,547 184,047 +500
PLANNING AND DESIGN........... 19,958 19,958 ............
-----------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION.. 362,822 392,765 +29,943
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:
FURNISHING ACCOUNT........ 30,884 30,884 ............
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT........ 84,914 84,914 ............
SERVICES ACCOUNT.......... 63,953 63,953 ............
UTILITIES................. 165,057 165,057 ............
MISCELLANEOUS............. 1,239 1,239 ............
LEASING................... 142,690 142,690 ............
MAINTENANCE............... 393,830 393,830 ............
MORTGAGE INSURANCE 71 71 ............
PREMIUMS.................
FOREIGN CURRENCY REDUCTION ............ -1,071 -1,071
-----------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND 882,638 881,567 -1,071
MAINTENANCE............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING, 1,245,460 1,274,332 +28,872
NAVY AND MARINE CORPS..
=========================================
FAMILY HOUSING, AIR FORCE

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: BOLLING 17,137 17,137 ............
AIR FORCE BASE (136 UNITS)...
IDAHO: MOUNTAIN HOME AFB (46 ............ 10,598 +10,598
UNITS).......................
NORTH DAKOTA:
CAVALIER (2 UNITS)........ 443 443 ............
MINOT AFB (134 UNITS)..... 19,097 19,097 ............
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS..... 174,046 174,046 ............
PLANNING AND DESIGN........... 12,760 12,760 ............
FOREIGN CURRENCY REDUCTION.... ............ -6,839 -6,839
-----------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION.. 223,483 227,242 +3,759
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:
FURNISHING ACCOUNT........ 38,180 38,180 ............
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT........ 55,685 55,685 ............
SERVICES ACCOUNT.......... 27,997 27,997 ............
UTILITIES................. 158,959 158,959 ............
MISCELLANEOUS............. 2,332 2,332 ............
LEASING................... 114,628 114,628 ............
MAINTENANCE............... 428,456 428,456 ............
MORTGAGE INSURANCE 34 34 ............
PREMIUMS.................
FOREIGN CURRENCY REDUCTION ............ -5,392 -5,392
-----------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND 826,271 820,879 -5,392
MAINTENANCE............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING, 1,049,754 1,048,121 -1,633
AIR FORCE..............
=========================================
FAMILY HOUSING, DEFENSE-WIDE

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:
SERVICE ACCOUNT (NSA)..... 415 415 ............
SERVICES ACCOUNT (DLA).... 77 77 ............
LEASING (NSA)............. 12,554 12,554 ............
LEASING (DIA)............. 25,924 25,924 ............
MAINTENANCE OF REAL 653 653 ............
PROPERTY (NSA)...........
MAINTENANCE OF REAL 316 316 ............
PROPERTY (DLA)...........
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT (NSA). 146 146 ............
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT (DIA). 3,564 3,564 ............
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT (DLA). 22 22 ............
UTILITIES ACCOUNT (NSA)... 444 444 ............
UTILITIES ACCOUNT (DLA)... 421 421 ............
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT (NSA).. 15 15 ............
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT (DLA).. 271 271 ............
MISCELLANEOUS (NSA)....... 64 64 ............
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING, 44,886 44,886 ............
DEFENSE-WIDE...........
=========================================
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE
ACCOUNT, PART IV

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE 1,174,369 1,174,369 ............
ACCOUNT, PART IV.............

GENERAL PROVISIONS

GENERAL PROVISION (SEC 125)... ............ -73,507 -73,507
=========================================
GRAND TOTAL............. 8,033,908 8,634,000 +600,092
=========================================
RECAPITULATION

ARMY.......................... 897,938 823,503 -74,435
NAVY.......................... 753,422 828,278 +74,856
AIR FORCE..................... 530,969 777,793 +246,824
DEFENSE AGENCIES.............. 784,753 801,098 +16,345
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD........... 59,130 233,675 +174,545
AIR NATIONAL GUARD............ 50,179 183,029 +132,850
ARMY RESERVE.................. 81,713 99,888 +18,175
NAVY RESERVE.................. 16,103 38,532 +22,429
AIR FORCE RESERVE............. 14,851 25,533 +10,682
-----------------------------------------
TOTAL MILITARY 3,189,058 3,811,329 +622,271
CONSTRUCTION...........
NATO INFRASTRUCTURE........... 190,000 175,000 -15,000
FAMILY HOUSING, ARMY.......... 1,140,381 1,179,470 +39,089
(NEW CONSTRUCTION)........ (91,974) (150,974) (+59,000)
(CONSTRUCTION (63,590) (63,590) ............
IMPROVEMENTS)............
(PLANNING AND DESIGN)..... (6,542) (6,542) ............
(OPERATION AND (978,275) (958,364) (-19,911)
MAINTENANCE).............
FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY AND 1,245,460 1,274,332 +28,872
MARINE CORPS.................
(NEW CONSTRUCTION)........ (159,317) (188,760) (+29,443)
(CONSTRUCTION (183,547) (184,047) (+500)
IMPROVEMENTS)............
(PLANNING AND DESIGN)..... (19,958) (19,958) ............
(OPERATION AND (882,638) (881,567) (-1,071)
MAINTENANCE).............
FAMILY HOUSING, AIR FORCE..... 1,049,754 1,048,121 -1,633
(NEW CONSTRUCTION)........ (36,677) (47,275) (+10,598)
(CONSTRUCTION (174,046) (174,046) ............
IMPROVEMENTS)............
(PLANNING AND DESIGN)..... (12,760) (12,760) ............
(FOREIGN CURRENCY ............ (-6,839) (-6,839)
REDUCTION)...............
(OPERATION AND (826,271) (820,879) (-5,392)
MAINTENANCE).............
FAMILY HOUSING, DEFENSE 44,886 44,886 ............
AGENCIES.....................
(OPERATION AND (44,822) (44,822) ............
MAINTENANCE).............
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE 1,174,369 1,174,369 ............
ACCOUNT......................
GENERAL PROVISIONS............ ............ -73,507 -73,507
=========================================
GRAND TOTAL............. 8,033,908 8,634,000 +600,092
------------------------------------------------------------------------

DIVISION B

TITLE I

COUNTERNARCOTICS

CHAPTER 1

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE--MILITARY

PROCUREMENT

Aircraft Procurement, Army

The Committee recommends $30,000,000 be made available for
procurement of one Airborne Reconnaissance Low (ARL) aircraft,
to replace the platform lost in the tragic crash during a
mission in Colombia last year.

OTHER DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROGRAMS

Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense

(including transfer of funds)

assistance for plan colombia

2000 appropriation to date.............................. $847,800,000
2000 supplemental estimate.............................. 160,800,000
Committee recommendation................................ 85,700,000

The Administration has requested emergency supplemental
appropriations of $98,400,000 in fiscal year 2000 and
$62,400,000 in fiscal year 2001 to support Plan Colombia goals.
The Committee recommendation of $85,700,000 funds the following
activities only for fiscal year 2000 and recommends no fiscal
year 2001 funding at this time:

PLAN COLOMBIA
[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Supplemental Supplemental Committee
request, request, recommendation,
fiscal year fiscal year fiscal year
2000 2001 2000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Counter-narcotics battalion support............................ 18,200 3,000 18,200
Counter-narcotics brigade headquarters......................... 1,000 .............. 1,000
Army aviation infrastructure support........................... 8,200 5,000 8,200
Military reform................................................ 3,000 3,000 3,000
Organic intelligence capability................................ .............. 5,000 ...............
Senior Scout................................................... .............. 5,000 ...............
Tracker aircraft modifications................................. 7,000 3,000 7,000
AC-47 aircraft modifications................................... 1,000 6,400 1,000
Ground-based radar............................................. 13,000 7,000 ...............
Radar command and control...................................... 5,000 .............. 5,000
Andean Ridge intelligence collection........................... 3,000 4,000 3,000
Colombian ground interdiction.................................. 5,000 .............. 5,000
Classified..................................................... 34,000 .............. 34,300
--------------------------------
Total.................................................... 98,400 62,400 85,700
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to provide a
report to the defense committees which outlines specific uses
for all funds appropriated in this account, within 45 days of
enactment. If any variance for the use of these funds is
proposed, the Under Secretary of Defense, Comptroller shall
notify the Committees on Appropriations 15 session days prior
to any obligation or movement of funds. Additionally, the
Assistant Secretary of Defense, Special Operations and Low-
Intensity Conflict shall provide a monthly report to the
defense committees, which shall include the following
information for the preceding month; identification of private
sector firms providing support in any capacity, the number of
American citizens located overseas in execution of supporting
contracts, and the number of military personnel and U.S.
Government employees operating in Colombia and the surrounding
region in support of Plan Colombia.

Classified Programs

The Committee's recommendations regarding classified
programs are summarized in a classified annex accompanying this
report.

GENERAL PROVISIONS--THIS CHAPTER

Sec. 101. The Committee includes a provision that places a
limit of $45,000,000 on the funds made available for the
provision of support for counter-drug activities of the
Government of Colombia, and requires a report on all support
contracts prior to obligation of any funds.

CHAPTER 2

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Military Construction, Defense-wide

2000 appropriation to date.............................. $593,615,000
2000 supplemental estimate.............................. 38,600,000
Committee recommendation................................ 116,523,000

The Committee recommends $116,523,000 for Military
Construction, Defense-wide, as compared to the request of
$38,600,000. These amounts are provided as a contingent
emergency appropriation for the construction of three Forward
Operating Locations to support the Colombia Anti-Drug Program,
as follows:

Ecuador:
Airfield Pavement/Rinse Facility.................... $38,600,000
Aircraft Maintenance Hangar/Nose/Dock Apron......... 6,723,000
Expeditionary Maintenance Facilities................ 4,900,000
Expeditionary Rescue Station........................ 2,200,000
Expeditionary Squadron Ops/AMU/Storage.............. 2,600,000
Expeditionary Visiting Airmen Quarters/Dining
Facility.......................................... 4,650,000
Expeditionary Visiting Officer Quarters............. 1,600,000
--------------------------------------------------------
____________________________________________________
Subtotal, Ecuador................................. 61,273,000
========================================================
____________________________________________________
Aruba:
Airfield Pavement/Rinse Facility.................... 8,800,000
Expeditionary Maintenance Facilities................ 860,000
Small Exped. Aircraft Maintenance Hangar/Apron...... 590,000
--------------------------------------------------------
____________________________________________________
Subtotal, Aruba................................... 10,250,000
========================================================
____________________________________________________
Curacao:
Airfield Pavement/Rinse Facility.................... 29,500,000
Aircraft Maintenance Hangar/Nose/Dock Apron......... 9,200,000
Expeditionary Maintenance Facilities................ 3,000,000
Expeditionary Squadron Ops/AMU/Storage.............. 2,200,000
--------------------------------------------------------
____________________________________________________
Subtotal, Curacao................................. 43,900,000
========================================================
____________________________________________________
Various: Planning and Design............................ 1,100,000
========================================================
____________________________________________________
Total............................................. 116,523,000

GENERAL PROVISION--THIS CHAPTER

Sec. 201. The Committee includes a provision that requires
the Secretary of Defense to report on the construction,
security and operation of the Forward Operating Locations (FOL)
in Manta, Ecuador, Aruba and Curacao.

CHAPTER 3

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

U.S. Coast Guard

OPERATING EXPENSES

(Emergency appropriations)

2000 appropriation to date.............................. $2,781,000,000
2000 supplemental estimate..............................................
Committee recommendation (emergency appropriations)..... 262,446,000

The Committee is concerned that the Coast Guard has been
forced to curtail its operations, including drug interdiction
efforts, because of a shortage of qualified personnel, lack of
spare parts, and aging or obsolete equipment. The declining
state of readiness has severely constrained the operations of
the long-range aircraft fleet in particular, which is adversely
affecting the execution of search and rescue efforts as well as
maritime patrols. The Committee is aware that C-130
availability has dropped 20 percent over the past 4 years and
that the hours C-130 aircraft are not mission-ready due to
spare parts shortage have risen three-fold. To rectify the
Coast Guard's readiness concerns and to ensure an adequate
level of operations, the Committee recommends $64,446,000 for
aviation spare parts and maintenance and $29,000,000 for
programmed flight hours. The Committee directs the Coast Guard
to submit a report outlining strategies for improving the
capability of aviation assets and the availability of the long-
range aircraft by July 1, 2000. At a minimum, the report should
include analyses of upgrading the existing long-range aircraft
fleet, acquiring new aircraft, including J model C-130 and
other aircraft, and identifying other government or private H
model C-130 aircraft that could be modified for Coast Guard
use.
The Committee recommendation also includes: $40,000,000 for
military pay and benefits; $24,000,000 for recruiting
activities and recruiting and retention bonuses; $59,000,000 to
reduce the maintenance backlog of vessels, equipment, and shore
facilities; and $46,000,000 for operational fuel.
The Committee expects that supplemental operating funds
will be prioritized for drug interdiction activities. It is
important, however, that increased investment in drug
interdiction activities not come at the expense of other Coast
Guard missions. The Committee asserts that the Coast Guard
should not reduce operations or asset availability for search
and rescue, fisheries enforcement, maritime environmental
disaster response, and other operational areas below baseline
levels. The entire amount appropriated has been designated as
an emergency requirement pursuant to the Balanced Budget and
Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, as amended.

ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION AND IMPROVEMENTS

(Emergency appropriations)

2000 appropriation to date.............................. $389,326,000
2000 supplemental estimate..............................................
Committee recommendation (emergency appropriations)..... 74,859,000

To expand the Coast Guard drug interdiction activities, the
bill provides $74,859,000 for various capital acquisition
projects, to be allocated as follows: $32,000,000 for vessels
authorized by the Western Hemisphere Drug Elimination Act;
$12,000,000 for electronic sensors for Coast Guard cutters and
boats, including electro-optical/infrared (EO/IR) systems;
$5,459,000 for commercial satellite communications upgrade
equipment; $7,500,000 for 5 over-the-horizon cutter boats to
respond to the ``go fast'' drug smuggling threat; $10,000,000
to modify the C-130 aircraft fleet cockpits to be night vision
capable; and $7,900,000 for acquisition and installation of
forward looking infrared (FLIR) systems. The entire amount
appropriated has been designated as an emergency requirement
pursuant to the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control
Act of 1985, as amended.

RESERVE TRAINING

(Emergency appropriations)

2000 appropriation to date.............................. $72,000,000
2000 supplemental estimate..............................................
Committee recommendation (emergency appropriations)..... 3,750,000

The Committee recommends $3,750,000 for reserve training.
The Committee understands that this should fully fund and
maintain a Selected Reserve level of at least 8,000. The entire
amount appropriated has been designated as an emergency
requirement pursuant to the Balanced Budget and Emergency
Deficit Control Act of 1985, as amended.

TITLE II

PEACEKEEPING OPERATIONS IN KOSOVO AND OTHER NATIONAL SECURITY MATTERS

CHAPTER 1

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE--MILITARY

Storm Damage and Natural Disasters

The Committee recommends a total of $128,226,000 in new
budget authority for the Department of Defense for costs
resulting from storm, hurricane, and earthquake damage to U.S.
military bases and installations.
The supplemental request focused, admittedly, on storm
damage costs related solely to Hurricane Floyd, and was
prepared without detailed consideration of Service
requirements. Following receipt of the supplemental request,
the Committee has received additional storm damage and natural
disaster cost estimates from the military services. Based on
these estimates, which include costs resulting from Hurricanes
Irene, Dennis, and Jose, Typhoons Bart and Olga, an earthquake
which struck Southern California, and winter storm damage in
Alaska, the Committee recommends funding that exceeds the
request by $100,826,000.

NATURAL DISASTERS--REPAIRS
[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Supplemental Committee
request recommendation Difference
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operation and Maintenance:
Army........................................................ .............. 23,883 +23,883
Navy........................................................ .............. 20,565 +20,565
Marine Corps................................................ .............. 37,155 +37,155
Air Force................................................... .............. 38,065 +38,065
Defense-Wide................................................ 27,400 .............. -27,400
Army Reserve................................................ .............. 2,174 +2,174
Army National Guard......................................... .............. 2,851 +2,851
Defense Health Program...................................... .............. 3,533 +3,533
-------------------------------
Total..................................................... 27,400 128,226 +100,826
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Operation and Maintenance, Army

The Committee directs that Operation and Maintenance, Army
funds recommended in the bill for the repair of storm damage
shall provide the following program in fiscal year 2000:

Committee
Command recommendation

AMC...........................................................$1,514,000
FORSCOM....................................................... 2,278,000
USMA.......................................................... 2,464,000
USAREUR....................................................... 3,841,000
TRADOC........................................................ 7,204,000
ATEC.......................................................... 2,231,000
USARPAC....................................................... 4,351,000
--------------------------------------------------------------
____________________________________________________

Total...................................................23,883,000

Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide

The Committee recommends $40,000,000 for several
initiatives and requirements related to U.S. Navy relations
with the people of Vieques, Puerto Rico.

Overseas Contingency Operations Transfer Fund

The Committee recommends a total of $1,850,400,000 in new
budget authority for the Department of Defense for costs
related to the ongoing policing and peacekeeping activities in
Kosovo and East Timor.
Despite the language contained in Senate Report 106-53, and
Section 8110 of Public Law 106-79, the Secretary of Defense
has, in fiscal year 1999, again failed to ensure that funds
transferred from the Overseas Contingency Operations Transfer
Fund appropriation were solely for the costs of contingency
operations.
For example, during fiscal year 1999, the Army transferred
readiness funds appropriated for operating forces (BA1) to
other service administrative activities (BA4), and subsequently
requested $1,100,000,000 in contingency costs (BA1). These
funds were then allocated to a reception center in the United
States, video teleconferencing equipment, and to restore
congressional reductions for headquarters activities.
The following table provides details of the emergency
supplemental appropriations in this chapter for the Overseas
Contingency Operations Transfer Fund.

FISCAL YEAR 2000 CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS
[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Supplemental Committee
request recommendation Difference
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kosovo:
Military Personnel:
Army.................................................... 157,400 157,400 ..............
Navy.................................................... 25,600 25,600 ..............
Marine Corps............................................ 6,400 6,400 ..............
Air Force............................................... 2,400 2,400 ..............
-------------------------------
Total................................................. 191,800 191,800 ..............
===============================
Operation and Maintenance:
Army.................................................... 1,332,100 1,132,100 -200,000
Navy.................................................... 49,900 49,900 ..............
Marine Corps............................................ .............. .............. ..............
Air Force............................................... 114,800 114,800 ..............
Defense-Wide:
USSOCOM............................................. 24,000 24,000 ..............
AFIS................................................ 300 300 ..............
DISA................................................ 52,200 52,200 ..............
DLA................................................. 2,200 2,200 ..............
Other............................................... 226,600 226,600 ..............
-------------------------------
Total, Defense-Wide............................... 305,300 305,300 ..............
===============================
Navy Reserve............................................ 100 100 ..............
OHDACA.................................................. 12,000 12,000 ..............
-------------------------------
Total................................................. 1,814,200 1,614,200 -200,000
===============================
Other: Defense Health Program............................... 19,400 19,400 ..............
===============================
Total Kosovo.............................................. 2,025,400 1,825,400 -200,000
===============================
East Timor:
Operation and Maintenance:
Army.................................................... 9,000 9,000 ..............
Navy.................................................... 12,000 12,000 ..............
Marine Corps............................................ 1,000 1,000 ..............
Air Force............................................... 3,000 3,000 ..............
-------------------------------
Total East Timor...................................... 25,000 25,000 ..............
===============================
Overseas Contingency Operations Transfer Fund: Grand Total...... 2,050,400 1,850,400 -200,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Classified Programs

The Committee's recommendations regarding classified
programs are summarized in a classified annex accompanying this
report.

PROCUREMENT

Aircraft Procurement, Air Force

2000 appropriation to date.............................. $824,530,000
2000 supplemental estimate.............................. 73,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 73,000,000

The Committee recommends an emergency supplemental
appropriation of $73,000,000, the request amount, for the
purchase and modification of an aircraft for the Foreign
Emergency Support Team (FEST).

OTHER DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROGRAMS

Defense Health Program

The Committee bill includes a general provision which
provides $695,900,000 for emergent and unforeseen requirements
in the Defense Health Program.
During a recent hearing on DOD medical programs, the
Defense Subcommittee was informed of serious, widespread
funding shortfalls within the Defense Health Program. As
outlined to the Subcommittee, these shortfalls are prevalent in
the current fiscal year, are already anticipated in fiscal year
2001, and have been quantified at up to $6,000,000,000 across
fiscal years 2002 through 2007.
The Committee views the most pressing of these shortfalls
to be those in the direct care side of the Military Health
System--those areas that directly affect quality of life for
military service members and their families, and impact their
ability to access and receive quality health care. Each of the
three service Surgeons General are facing current year budgets
in their military medical treatment facilities that are
minimally executable; the Committee finds this situation
unacceptable.
The Committee bill provides funds to address the most
pressing and immediate requirements of the direct care system
as outlined by the service Surgeons General.
Further, the Committee directs the Department to report to
the congressional defense committees within 30 days of the
enactment of this Act on the application and use of the funds
provided.

GENERAL PROVISIONS--THIS CHAPTER

Sec. 2101. Basic Allowance for Housing. The Committee
includes a provision which provides the Department the
authority to maintain housing allowances at the 1999 levels
during fiscal years 2000 and 2001.
Sec. 2102. Fuel Inflation. The budget request for fiscal
year 2001 includes a surcharge to recover cash losses due to
the cost of inflation for the purchase of bulk petroleum.
Despite this surcharge, the Department of Defense projects
losses for fuel price inflation to equal $965,000,000 for
fiscal years 2000-2002. The Committee includes a general
provision which provides $964,300,000 to cover the cost of
inflation for bulk petroleum purchased by the Department of
Defense.
Sec. 2103. Defense Health Program. The Committee includes a
provision which provides $695,900,000, for emergent and
unforeseen requirements in the Defense Health Program.
Sec. 2104. Biometrics Information Assurance. The Committee
recommends an additional $5,000,000 for biometrics information
assurance programs for program element 432140 for the Army
Information System Security Program. The additional funding
provided by the Committee supplements funding provided in
fiscal year 2000 for biometrics ready computer prototypes and
pilots and other biometrics activities to ensure that the
Biometrics Fusion Center described below will be established
immediately, and that its activities begin on an accelerated
schedule. The Committee also recommends an additional
$1,000,000 each for the Navy and the Air Force to support the
consolidation and coordination of Department of Defense (DOD)
biometrics programs described below.
The U.S. confronts serious domestic and international
threats to its information assurance infrastructure and
critical asset facilities. While current methods of security
are inadequate to deal with potential cyber-threats and
vulnerabilities, biometrics is an evolving technology that can
provide security in depth and information assurance. Current
DOD biometrics program activities are fragmented with no single
agency providing vision, leadership, or coordination. Moreover,
there currently does not appear to be an orchestrated effort
within DOD sufficient to determine needs/requirements in
research, development, and acquisition to advise the user
communities in integration of biometrics technology.
Recognizing the difficulties in responding to current and
potential cyber-threats, the Committee makes two
recommendations requiring immediate attention. To ensure the
availability of biometric technologies in the DOD, it
recommends that the Army be established as the Executive Agent
to lead, consolidate, and coordinate all biometrics information
assurance programs of the DOD. The Committee includes language
in the bill establishing the Army as Executive Agency effective
with enactment of this bill into law.
To ensure the availability of biometrics technologies in
the DOD, the Committee recommends immediate establishment of an
interim Biometrics Fusion Center, and that initial activities
of the Center should include management of test and evaluation
of commercial off-the-shelf biometrics software and hardware,
and definition of requirements and equipment and software
standards for the DOD. The Committee believes that
establishment of the Center is a timely DOD response to the
President's National Plan for Information Systems Protection,
published in January 2000, which directs the DOD to create
organizational structures to identify and fix vulnerabilities,
develop and deploy intrusion detection systems, and launch key
innovative research and development projects. The Center could
also support the Institute for Infrastructure Protection, which
is directed by the National Plan. The Committee directs that
the Biometrics Fusion Center be established immediately, and
that its activities begin on an accelerated schedule.
Sec. 2105. Patriot missile reliability enhancement program.
The Committee has included a provision which provides
$125,000,000 to the Patriot missile program.
Sec. 2106. Operation Walking Shield. The Committee includes
a general provision which provides $300,000 for the Department
of Defense for Operation Walking Shield.
Sec. 2107. East Timor and Mozambique. The Committee
includes a general provision to provide funds for humanitarian
assistance and peacekeeping.
Sec. 2108. Transfer of funds. The Committee includes a
general provision transferring previously appropriated funds to
the EPA.
Sec. 2109. LHD-8. The Committee includes a general
provision on LHD-8.
Sec. 2110. Infrastructure support assistance. Staging the
Olympic and Paralympic Games will require that significant
temporary resources, unavailable through Olympic and Paralympic
sponsorships, be assembled in Utah. In order to meet this need,
a one-time infusion of funds is needed to respond to requests
for assistance from the organizing committee. The most
significant need is for communications assistance, including a
temporary increase to the communications infrastructure and an
estimated 8,000 radios for Olympic Games operations; 2,000 of
these radios will remain for use during the Paralympic Games.
In order to ensure that required equipment, infrastructure and
other support is available in time for international
competitions, held as test events for the Games in the fall of
2000 and winter of 2001, funds must be available for obligation
in fiscal year 2000. Additionally, all infrastructure
associated with the Games must be designed and installed no
later than September of 2001, requiring that contracting for
many Olympic support requirements begin in fiscal year 2000.
Sec. 2111. BMDO. The Committee includes a general provision
regarding BMDO program management.

CHAPTER 2

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES

Weapons Activities

2000 appropriation to date.............................. $4,427,052,000
2000 supplemental estimate.............................. \1\ 55,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 131,000,000

\1\ Requested as a non-emergency supplemental.

The Committee recommends an additional appropriation of
$131,000,000 for Weapons Activities of the Department of
Energy.
The amount recommended by the Committee provides
$92,000,000 for Weapons Activities of the Department of Energy
for production readiness, critical workforce, and
infrastructure improvements throughout the complex. The
recommendation includes $25,000,000 for the Y-12 Plant in
Tennessee; $15,000,000 for the Kansas City Plant in Missouri,
$12,000,000 for the Pantex Plant in Texas; $20,000,000 for Los
Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico; $17,000,000 for
Sandia National Laboratory in New Mexico, and $3,000,000 for
the Savannah River Site to support national security
commitments to the Department of Defense and to address
critical infrastructure issues that are not being addressed
within the production complex.
The Committee recommends an additional $6,000,000 to
support nuclear safeguards and security within the National
Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). The funds are urgently
needed for the cyber security program in order to address
protection of NNSA's computer systems, provide cyber security
tools and capabilities, and to ensure that classified and
unclassified information is protected consistently across the
various sites within the NNSA. Lack of additional funding will
continue to place classified and unclassified information at
risk. Specifically, funding is required for extensive review of
cyber security plans at NNSA sites, for development and
training for people responsible for implementing cyber security
programs and protection measures, and to enhance the NNSA's
capabilities for cyber incident response and core cyber
security architecture and intrusion detection.
The Committee recommendation also includes $20,000,000 for
cyber security upgrades. Improvements in the cyber security of
the nuclear weapons complex have been accomplished at a
substantial cost in 1999 and 2000. Substantially reducing the
remaining risks while providing mission functionality is
extremely difficult and correspondingly expensive. The
Committee is aware of the DOE's Information Security Management
study that broadly addressed the threats with generic solutions
that were estimated to cost $850,000,000 across the complex. It
is highly unlikely such resources will be available. The DOE
must develop more affordable policy alternatives on information
security. Therefore, the Committee directs the NNSA to perform
planning, analysis, testing and evaluation necessary to develop
the highest-value alternatives for improving cyber security at
the laboratories, plants, field and headquarters. The Committee
further directs the NNSA to submit to the Committee a detailed
plan with estimated costs and schedules for a reasonable
program that defends the highest value targets in the weapons
complex.
The Committee recommends an additional $13,000,000 for
fleet upgrades for the Transportation Safeguards Division. The
30-Day Review found that ``During the past year, DP's
Transportation Safeguards Division (TSD), which is responsible
for providing safe, secure and cost effective transportation
for nuclear weapons in DOE custody received a `marginal'
security rating.'' The Committee recommends these funds to
correct the problems.
The Committee recommends an additional $5,000,000 for the
construction of U1h shaft at the U1a underground facility at
the Nevada Test Site. This shaft will enhance worker safety by
providing additional emergency evacuation capability and
expanded capacity at the U1a complex.

Other Defense Activities

2000 appropriation to date.............................. $1,722,444,000
2000 supplemental estimate.............................. 18,000,000
Committee recommendation................................ 12,000,000

The Committee recommendation includes an additional
$12,000,000 for Other Defense Activities of the Department of
Energy.
Nuclear Safeguards & Security.--The Department requested an
additional $8,000,000 for the Office of Security and Emergency
Operations to support the cyber security program in the areas
of policy and planning, training, operations, and technical
development. The request would also fund current Federal
employees and the hiring of additional Federal employees within
the Office of Security and Emergency Operations to support a
variety of functions that are properly within the authority and
responsibility of the Administrator of the National Nuclear
Security Administration. Section 3213(b)(6) of Public Law 106-
65 gives the Administrator of the National Nuclear Security
Administration authority over, and responsibility for,
safeguards and security for all programs and activities of the
National Nuclear Security Administration. As such, the
Committee recommends $2,000,000 for the Office of Security and
Emergency Operations to support cyber security and emergency
operations of the Department that are not within the
responsibility and authority of the National Nuclear Security
Administration.
Environmental, Safety and Health.--A number of
environmental, safety and health issues have been raised
concerning the Department of Energy's operation of the gaseous
diffusion plants in Kentucky, Ohio and Tennessee. The Committee
understands that site reviews have found no issues warranting
the shut down of current operations, but have raised
significant issues concerning past practices and the impact
upon the environment and worker safety. The Committee is also
aware that the Department has initiated activities to address
these legacy issues and that additional funding is needed to
continue this work. Therefore, the Committee recommends that an
additional $10,000,000 be provided in fiscal year 2000 to
continue activities to address worker medical, health and
safety concerns.

CHAPTER 3

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Military Construction, Defense-Wide

2000 appropriation to date.............................. $593,615,000
2000 supplemental estimate..............................................
Committee recommendation................................ 1,000,000

The Committee recommends an additional $1,000,000 for
Military Construction, Defense-wide, to augment the Corps of
Engineers' planning and design work associated with the
National Missile Defense system.

Military Construction, Army National Guard

2000 appropriation to date.............................. $227,456,000
2000 supplemental estimate..............................................
Committee recommendation................................ 9,145,000

The Committee recommends $9,145,000 as a contingent
emergency appropriation due to storm damage related to
Hurricane Georges for a Readiness Center in Gulfport,
Mississippi. Funding for this project was requested in the
``Operation and maintenance, Defense-Wide'' appropriation.

Military Construction, Army Reserve

2000 appropriation to date.............................. $111,340,000
2000 supplemental estimate..............................................
Committee recommendation................................ 12,348,000

The Committee recommends $12,348,000 as a contingent
emergency appropriation due to storm damage related to
Hurricane Floyd for an Armed Forces Reserve Center in
Greenville, North Carolina.

GENERAL PROVISIONS--THIS CHAPTER

Sec. 2301. Recommends $4,700,000 as a contingent emergency
for storm related damage to family housing at numerous
locations, as authorized by Section 2854 of Title 10, United
States Code.
Sec. 2302. Authorizes the use of private donations for the
purpose of renovating the Marine Corps' historic residences.
The provision requires a thirty day notification to the
appropriate committees of the Congress prior to the use of such
funds.
Sec. 2303. Revises Section 8168 of the Department of the
Defense Appropriations Act, 2000 (Public Law 106-7) to clarify
reporting requirements placed on the Department of the Air
Force.
Sec. 2304. Provides further guidance to the Department of
Defense concerning planning and design funds impacting the
Naval Submarine Base, Bangor, Washington.

TITLE III

GENERAL PROVISIONS--THIS DIVISION

Sec. 2402. The Committee has included language that repeals
certain pay date shifts that were included in the Fiscal Year
2000 Consolidated Appropriations Act. That Act provided that
when military members were to be paid on September 30, 2000, or
when civilian employees were to be paid on September 29, 2000,
or on September 30, 2000, these groups were to be paid on
October 1, 2000. Section 5002 of this Act repeals those pay
date shifts.
Sec. 2404. The Committee includes a provision which
provides authorization for intelligence activities in this Act.
Sec. 2405. The Committee includes a provision repealing
sections 8175 and 8176 of Public Law 106-79.
Sec. 2406. The Committee includes a provision which
provides a 3-year term for the first person appointed as Under
Secretary for Nuclear Security of the Department of Energy.
Sec. 2407. The Committee includes a general provision which
restates direction to the Navy provided in Senate Report 106-
53.
Sec. 2408. The Committee amends section 509 of title 32,
United States Code.
Sec. 2409. The Committee includes a general provision
related to the awarding of the Medal of Honor.
Sec. 2410. The Committee has included a general provision
prohibiting the expenditure of funds for the continued
deployment of United States military forces in Kosovo after
July 1, 2001, unless the President seeks and secures
Congressional authorization to continue the deployment beyond
that date.

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY ESTIMATES AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2000 SUPPLEMENTAL
[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Committee
recommendation
Supplemental Committee compared with
Doc. No. request recommendation supplemental
request (+ or -
)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DIVISION B

FISCAL YEAR 2000 SUPPLEMENTALS

TITLE I--COUNTERNARCOTICS

CHAPTER 1

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE--MILITARY PROCUREMENT

...... Aircraft procurement, Army (contingent emergency ............... 30,000 +30,000
appropriations)

OTHER DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROGRAMS

106-162 Drug interdiction and counter-drug activities, 98,400 85,700 -12,700
Defense (emergency appropriations)
====================================================
Total, Chapter 1:
New budget (obligational) authority 98,400 115,700 +17,300
Emergency appropriations (98,400) (85,700) (-12,700)
Contingent emergency appropriations ............... (30,000) (+30,000)
====================================================
CHAPTER 2

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE--MILITARY

106-162 Military construction, Defense-wide (emergency 38,600 ............... -38,600
appropriations)
...... Contingent emergency appropriations ............... 116,523 +116,523
====================================================
CHAPTER 3

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

...... Operating expenses (contingent emergency ............... 262,446 +262,446
appropriations)
...... Acquisition, construction and improvements ............... 74,859 +74,859
(contingent emergency appropriations)
...... Reserve training (contingent emergency ............... 3,750 +3,750
appropriations)
====================================================
Total, Chapter 3: New budget (obligational) ............... 341,055 +341,055
authority
====================================================
Total, title I:
New budget (obligational) authority 137,000 573,278 +436,278
Emergency appropriations (137,000) (85,700) (-51,300)
Contingent emergency appropriations ............... (487,578) (+487,578)
====================================================
TITLE II--PEACEKEEPING OPERATIONS IN KOSOVO AND
OTHER NATIONAL SECURITY MATTERS

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

CHAPTER 1

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE--MILITARY

Operation and Maintenance

...... Operations and maintenance, Army (emergency ............... 23,883 +23,883
appropriations)
...... Operation and maintenance, Navy (emergency ............... 20,565 +20,565
appropriations)
...... Operation and maintenance, Marine Corps (emergency ............... 37,155 +37,155
appropriations)
...... Operation and maintenance, Air Force (emergency ............... 38,065 +38,065
appropriations)
106-162 Operation and maintenance, Defense-wide (emergency 27,400 40,000 +12,600
appropriations)
...... Operation and maintenance, Army Reserve (emergency ............... 2,174 +2,174
appropriations)
...... Operation and maintenance, Army National Guard ............... 2,851 +2,851
(emergency appropriations)
106-162 Overseas contingency operations transfer fund 2,050,400 1,850,400 -200,000
(emergency appropriations)
----------------------------------------------------
Total, Operation and Maintenance 2,077,800 2,015,093 -62,707
====================================================
Procurement

106-162 Aircraft procurement, Air Force (emergency 73,000 73,000 ...............
appropriations)

Other Department of Defense Programs

...... Defense health program (emergency appropriations) ............... 3,533 +3,533

General Provisions

...... Defense-wide working capital fund (emergency ............... 964,300 +964,300
appropriations) (sec. 2102)
...... Defense health program (emergency appropriations) ............... 695,900 +695,900
(sec. 2103)
...... Biometrics (contingent emergency appropriations) ............... 7,000 +7,000
(sec. 2104)
...... Patriot Mods (contingent emergency appropriations) ............... 125,000 +125,000
(sec 2105)
...... Operation Walking Shield (emergency ............... 300 +300
appropriations) (sec. 2106)
...... East Timor and Mozambique humanitarian assistance ............... 61,500 +61,500
(contingent emergency appropriations) (sec. 2107)
...... Macalloy (by transfer) (sec. 2108) ............... (9,642) (+9,642)
...... Olympic Games support (contingent emergency ............... 8,000 +8,000
appropriations) (sec. 2110)
====================================================
Total, Chapter 1:
New budget (obligational) authority 2,150,800 3,953,626 +1,802,826
Emergency appropriations (2,150,800) (3,752,126) (+1,601,326)
Contingent emergency appropriations ............... (201,500) (+201,500)
(By transfer) ............... (9,642) (+9,642)
====================================================
CHAPTER 2

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Atomic Energy Defense Activities
106-162 Weapons activities 55,000 ............... -55,000
...... (Contingent emergency appropriations) ............... 136,000 +136,000
106-162 Other defense activities 14,000 ............... -14,000
(Contingent emergency appropriations) ............... 12,000 +12,000
106-162 (By transfer) (4,000) ............... (-4,000)
106-194 Defense environmental restoration and waste -13,000 ............... +13,000
management (rescission)
----------------------------------------------------
Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities 56,000 148,000 +92,000
====================================================
Total, Chapter 2:
New budget (obligational) authority 56,000 148,000 +92,000
Appropriations (69,000) ............... (-69,000)
Rescissions (-13,000) ............... (+13,000)
Contingent emergency appropriations ............... (148,000) (+148,000)
(By transfer) (4,000) ............... (-4,000)
====================================================
CHAPTER 3

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE--MILITARY

...... Military construction, Defense-Wide (contingent ............... 1,000 +1,000
emergency appropriations)
...... Military construction, Army National Guard ............... 9,145 +9,145
(contingent emergency appropriations)
...... Military construction, Army Reserve (contingent ............... 12,348 +12,348
emergency appropriations)
----------------------------------------------------
Total, Military Construction ............... 22,493 +22,493
====================================================
GENERAL PROVISIONS

...... Family housing, Navy and Marine Corps (contingent ............... 3,000 +3,000
emergency appropriations) (sec. 2301)
...... Family housing, Air Force (contingent emergency ............... 1,700 +1,700
appropriations) (sec. 2301)
====================================================
Total, Chapter 3: New budget (obligational) ............... 27,193 +27,193
authority
====================================================
Total, title II:
New budget (obligational) authority 2,206,800 4,128,819 +1,922,019
Appropriations (69,000) ............... (-69,000)
Rescissions (-13,000) ............... (+13,000)
Emergency appropriations (2,150,800) (3,752,126) (+1,601,326)
Contingent emergency appropriations ............... (376,693) (+376,693)
(By transfer) (4,000) (9,642) (+5,642)
====================================================
Grand total, all titles:
New budget (obligational) authority 2,343,800 4,702,097 +2,358,297
Appropriations (69,000) ............... (-69,000)
Emergency appropriations (2,287,800) (3,837,826) (+1,550,026)
Contingent emergency appropriations ............... (864,271) (+864,271)
(By transfer) (4,000) (9,642) (+5,642)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

All Congresses 93-116 (1973-2020)
116 (2019-2020)
115 (2017-2018)
114 (2015-2016)
113 (2013-2014)
112 (2011-2012)
111 (2009-2010)
110 (2007-2008)
109 (2005-2006)
108 (2003-2004)
107 (2001-2002)
106 (1999-2000)
105 (1997-1998)
104 (1995-1996)
103 (1993-1994)
102 (1991-1992)
101 (1989-1990)
100 (1987-1988)
99 (1985-1986)
98 (1983-1984)
97 (1981-1982)
96 (1979-1980)
95 (1977-1978)
94 (1975-1976)
93 (1973-1974)

Any Version of Legislation
AS - Amendment Ordered to be Printed
ASH - Additional Sponsors House
ATH - Agreed to House
ATS - Agreed to Senate
CDH - Committee Discharged House
CDS - Committee Discharged Senate
CPH - Considered and Passed House
CPS - Considered and Passed Senate
EAH - Engrossed Amendment House
EAS - Engrossed Amendment Senate
EH - Engrossed in House
ENR - Enrolled
ES - Engrossed in Senate
FPH - Failed Passage House
HDS - Held at Desk Senate
IH - Introduced in House
IPS - Indefinitely Postponed Senate
IS - Introduced in Senate
LTH - Laid on Table in House
LTS - Laid on Table in Senate
PAP - Printed as Passed
PCS - Placed on Calendar Senate
PP - Public Print
Private Law
Public Law
RCH - Reference Change House
RCS - Reference Change Senate
RDS - Received in Senate
RFH - Referred in House
RFS - Referred in Senate
RH - Reported in House
RIH - Referral Instructions House
RS - Reported to Senate
RTH - Referred to Committee House
RTS - Referred to Committee Senate
SC - Sponsor Change

All Congresses 97-116 (1981-2020)
116 (2019-2020)
115 (2017-2018)
114 (2015-2016)
113 (2013-2014)
112 (2011-2012)
111 (2009-2010)
110 (2007-2008)
109 (2005-2006)
108 (2003-2004)
107 (2001-2002)
106 (1999-2000)
105 (1997-1998)
104 (1995-1996)
103 (1993-1994)
102 (1991-1992)
101 (1989-1990)
100 (1987-1988)
99 (1985-1986)
98 (1983-1984)
97 (1981-1982)

Any State or Territory
Alabama
Alaska
American Samoa
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Guam
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Northern Mariana Islands
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Panama Canal Zone
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virgin Islands
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming

Any State
Alabama
Alaska
American Samoa
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Guam
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Northern Mariana Islands
Northern Mariana Islands
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Panama Canal Zone
Panama Canal Zone
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virgin Islands
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming

All Congresses 96-116 (1979-2020)
116 (2019-2020)
115 (2017-2018)
114 (2015-2016)
113 (2013-2014)
112 (2011-2012)
111 (2009-2010)
110 (2007-2008)
109 (2005-2006)
108 (2003-2004)
107 (2001-2002)
106 (1999-2000)
105 (1997-1998)
104 (1995-1996)
103 (1993-1994)
102 (1991-1992)
101 (1989-1990)
100 (1987-1988)
99 (1985-1986)
98 (1983-1984)
97 (1981-1982)
96 (1979-1980)

All Congresses 81-116 (1949-2020)
116 (2019-2020)
115 (2017-2018)
114 (2015-2016)
113 (2013-2014)
112 (2011-2012)
111 (2009-2010)
110 (2007-2008)
109 (2005-2006)
108 (2003-2004)
107 (2001-2002)
106 (1999-2000)
105 (1997-1998)
104 (1995-1996)
103 (1993-1994)
102 (1991-1992)
101 (1989-1990)
100 (1987-1988)
99 (1985-1986)
98 (1983-1984)
97 (1981-1982)
96 (1979-1980)
95 (1977-1978)
94 (1975-1976)
93 (1973-1974)
92 (1971-1972)
91 (1969-1970)
90 (1967-1968)
89 (1965-1966)
88 (1963-1964)
87 (1961-1962)
86 (1959-1960)
85 (1957-1958)
84 (1955-1956)
83 (1953-1954)
82 (1951-1952)
81 (1949-1950)

Any Topic
Agriculture
Arms Control
Aviation
Commercial
Consular
Dispute Settlement and Arbitration
Drugs/Illegal Substances
Environment
Extradition
Extradition and Criminal Assistance
Fisheries and Wildlife
Human Rights
Intellectual Property/Copyrights
International Law
International Law and Organization
Investment
Labor
Maritime Boundaries and Claims
Mutual Legal Assistance
Shipping and Marine Pollution
Taxation
Telecommunications
Terrorism
Trademarks/Patents
United Nations