- TXT
-
PDF
(PDF provides a complete and accurate display of this text.)
Tip
?
Calendar No. 637
108th Congress Report
SENATE
2d Session 108-309
======================================================================
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATION BILL, 2005
_______
July 15, 2004.--Ordered to be printed
_______
Mrs. Hutchison, from the Committee on Appropriations,
submitted the following
R E P O R T
[To accompany S. 2674]
The Committee on Appropriations, to which was referred the
bill (H.R. 0000) making appropriations for military
construction, family housing, and base realignment and closure
for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending
September 30, 2005, and for other purposes, reports the same to
the Senate with amendments and recommends that the bill as
amended do pass. deg.
The Committee on Appropriations reports the bill (S. 2674)
making appropriations for military construction, family
housing, and base realignment and closure for the Department of
Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2005, and for
other purposes, reports favorably thereon and recommends that
the bill do pass.
Total of bill as reported to Senate..................... $10,003,000,000
Amount of 2005 budget estimate.......................... 9,553,375,000
Amount of 2004 appropriations........................... 9,316,000,000
The bill as reported to the Senate:
Over the budget estimate, 2005...................... 449,625,000
Above appropriations for fiscal year 2004........... 687,000,000
C O N T E N T S
----------
Page
Background:
Purpose of the bill.......................................... 3
Comparative statement........................................ 3
Compliance with section 308 of the Budget Control Act........ 8
Committee recommendation......................................... 8
Items of special interest........................................ 9
Military construction, Army...................................... 18
Military construction, Navy...................................... 18
Military construction, Air Force................................. 19
Military construction, Defense-wide.............................. 21
Military construction, Reserve components........................ 24
NATO Security Investment Program................................. 26
Family housing overview.......................................... 27
Family housing, Army............................................. 27
Family housing, Navy and Marine Corps............................ 29
Family housing, Air Force........................................ 30
Family housing, Defense-wide..................................... 32
Family housing improvement fund.................................. 32
Base realignment and closure account, part IV.................... 33
General provisions............................................... 35
Compliance with paragraph 7, rule XVI of the Standing Rules of
the Senate..................................................... 36
Compliance with paragraph 7(c), rule XXVI of the Standing Rules
of the Senate.................................................. 36
Compliance with paragraph 12, rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of
the Senate..................................................... 37
Project listing by location...................................... 38
BACKGROUND
Purpose of the Bill
The Military Construction appropriation bill provides
necessary funding for the planning, design, construction,
alteration, and improvement of military facilities worldwide,
both for Active and Reserve Forces. It also finances the
construction, alteration, improvement, operation, and
maintenance of military family housing, including payments
against past housing mortgage indebtedness. Certain types of
community impact assistance may be provided, as well as
assistance to members of the military who face loss on the sale
of private residences due to installation realignments and
closures. The bill is also the source for the U.S. share of the
NATO Security Investment Program. In addition, the bill
provides funding to implement base closures and realignments
authorized by law.
Comparative Statement
The Committee recommends appropriations totaling
$10,003,000,000 for fiscal year 2005 military construction,
family housing, and base closure. The following table displays
the Committee recommendation in comparison with the current
fiscal year, and the President's fiscal year 2005 request.
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Increase (+) or decrease (-) compared with--
Budget House allowance Committee -------------------------------------------------------
Item 2004 enacted estimate deg. recommendation Budget House
2004 enacted estimate allowance
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------
Military construction, Army.................................. 1,448,239 1,771,285 1,977,166 +528,927 +205,881
Rescissions.............................................. -183,615 .................. .................. +183,615 ..................
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 108-106)............ 162,100 .................. .................. -162,100 ..................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.................................................. 1,426,724 1,771,285 1,977,166 +550,442 +205,881
Military construction, Navy.................................. 1,238,458 1,060,455 1,016,315 -222,143 -44,140
Rescissions.............................................. -45,622 .................. .................. +45,622 ..................
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 108-106)............ 45,530 .................. .................. -45,530 ..................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.................................................. 1,238,366 1,060,455 1,016,315 -222,051 -44,140
Military construction, Air Force............................. 1,067,751 663,964 841,131 -226,620 +177,167
Rescission............................................... -23,000 .................. .................. +23,000 ..................
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 108-106)............ 292,550 .................. .................. -292,550 ..................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.................................................. 1,337,301 663,964 841,131 -496,170 +177,167
Military construction, Defense-wide.......................... 653,656 709,337 696,491 +42,835 -12,846
Rescission............................................... -72,309 .................. .................. +72,309 ..................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.................................................. 581,347 709,337 696,491 +115,144 -12,846
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Active components............................... 4,583,738 4,205,041 4,531,103 -52,635 +326,062
Military construction, Army National Guard................... 311,592 295,657 381,765 +70,173 +86,108
Military construction, Air National Guard.................... 222,908 127,368 231,083 +8,175 +103,715
Military construction, Army Reserve.......................... 88,451 87,070 66,325 -22,126 -20,745
Military construction, Naval Reserve......................... 45,498 25,285 33,735 -11,763 +8,450
Military construction, Air Force Reserve..................... 62,032 84,556 101,373 +39,341 +16,817
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Reserve components.............................. 730,481 619,936 814,281 +83,800 +194,345
==================================================================================================================================
Total, Military construction........................... 5,314,219 4,824,977 5,345,384 +31,165 +520,407
Appropriations..................................... (5,138,585) (4,824,977) (5,345,384) (+206,799) (+520,407)
Rescissions........................................ (-324,546) .................. .................. (+324,546) ..................
==================================================================================================================================
North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment 169,300 165,800 165,800 -3,500 ..................
Program.....................................................
Rescission............................................... -8,000 .................. .................. +8,000 ..................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.................................................. 161,300 165,800 165,800 +4,500 ..................
Family housing construction, Army............................ 383,591 636,099 636,099 +252,508 ..................
Rescission............................................... -94,151 .................. .................. +94,151 ..................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.................................................. 289,440 636,099 636,099 +346,659 ..................
Family housing operation and maintenance, Army............... 1,033,026 928,907 928,907 -104,119 ..................
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 108-106)............ 11,420 .................. .................. -11,420 ..................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.................................................. 1,044,446 928,907 928,907 -115,539 ..................
Family housing construction, Navy and Marine Corps........... 184,193 139,107 139,107 -45,086 ..................
Rescission............................................... -40,508 .................. .................. +40,508 ..................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.................................................. 143,685 139,107 139,107 -4,578 ..................
Family housing operation and maintenance, Navy and Marine 835,078 704,504 704,504 -130,574 ..................
Corps.......................................................
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 108-106)............ 6,280 .................. .................. -6,280 ..................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.................................................. 841,358 704,504 704,504 -136,854 ..................
Family housing construction, Air Force....................... 657,065 846,959 846,959 +189,894 ..................
Rescission............................................... -19,347 .................. .................. +19,347 ..................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.................................................. 637,718 846,959 846,959 +209,241 ..................
Family housing operation and maintenance, Air Force.......... 816,074 863,896 856,114 +40,040 -7,782
Emergency appropriations (Public Law 108-106)............ 6,981 .................. .................. -6,981 ..................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.................................................. 823,055 863,896 856,114 +33,059 -7,782
Family housing construction, Defense-wide.................... 350 49 49 -301 ..................
Family housing operation and maintenance, Defense-wide....... 49,440 49,575 49,575 +135 ..................
Department of Defense Family Housing Improvement Fund........ 300 2,500 2,500 +2,200 ..................
Rescission............................................... -9,692 .................. .................. +9,692 ..................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.................................................. -9,392 2,500 2,500 +11,892 ..................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Family housing.................................. 3,820,100 4,171,596 4,163,814 +343,714 -7,782
==================================================================================================================================
Chemical demilitarization construction, Defense.............. 119,815 81,886 81,886 -37,929 ..................
Base realignment and closure account......................... 370,427 246,116 246,116 -124,311 ..................
General provision (sec. 118)................................. 55,000 63,000 .................. -55,000 -63,000
==================================================================================================================================
Grand total:
New budget (obligational) authority................ 9,840,861 9,553,375 10,003,000 +162,139 +449,625
Appropriations................................. (9,812,244) (9,553,375) (10,003,000) (+190,756) (+449,625)
Emergency appropriations....................... (524,861) .................. .................. (-524,861) ..................
Rescissions.................................... (-496,244) .................. .................. (+496,244) ..................
==================================================================================================================================
SUMMARY OF APPROPRIATIONS ACCOUNTS
Military Construction, Army.................................. 1,426,724 1,771,285 1,977,166 +550,442 +205,881
Military Construction, Navy.................................. 1,238,366 1,060,455 1,016,315 -222,051 -44,140
Military Construction, Air Force............................. 1,337,301 663,964 841,131 -496,170 +177,167
Military Construction, Defense-wide.......................... 581,347 709,337 696,491 +115,144 -12,846
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Active components............................... 4,583,738 4,205,041 4,531,103 -52,635 +326,062
Military Construction, Army National Guard................... 311,592 295,657 381,765 +70,173 +86,108
Military Construction, Air National Guard.................... 222,908 127,368 231,083 +8,175 +103,715
Military Construction, Army Reserve.......................... 88,451 87,070 66,325 -22,126 -20,745
Military Construction, Naval Reserve......................... 45,498 25,285 33,735 -11,763 +8,450
Military Construction, Air Force Reserve..................... 62,032 84,556 101,373 +39,341 +16,817
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Reserve components.............................. 730,481 619,936 814,281 +83,800 +194,345
==================================================================================================================================
Total, Military Construction........................... 5,314,219 4,824,977 5,345,384 +31,165 +520,407
==================================================================================================================================
North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment 161,300 165,800 165,800 +4,500 ..................
Program.....................................................
Family Housing, Army:
Construction............................................. 289,440 636,099 636,099 +346,659 ..................
Operation and Maintenance................................ 1,044,446 928,907 928,907 -115,539 ..................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Family Housing, Army............................ 1,333,886 1,565,006 1,565,006 +231,120 ..................
Family Housing, Navy and Marine Corps:
Construction............................................. 143,685 139,107 139,107 -4,578 ..................
Operation and Maintenance................................ 841,358 704,504 704,504 -136,854 ..................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Family Housing, Navy and Marine Corps........... 985,043 843,611 843,611 -141,432 ..................
Family Housing, Air Force:
Construction............................................. 637,718 846,959 846,959 +209,241 ..................
Operation and Maintenance................................ 823,055 863,896 856,114 +33,059 -7,782
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Family Housing, Air Force....................... 1,460,773 1,710,855 1,703,073 +242,300 -7,782
Family Housing, Defense-wide:
Construction............................................. 350 49 49 -301 ..................
Operation and Maintenance................................ 49,440 49,575 49,575 +135 ..................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Family Housing, Defense-wide.................... 49,790 49,624 49,624 -166 ..................
Department of Defense Family Housing Improvement Fund........ -9,392 2,500 2,500 +11,892 ..................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total, Family Housing.................................. 3,820,100 4,171,596 4,163,814 +343,714 -7,782
Chemical demilitarization construction, Defense.............. 119,815 81,886 81,886 -37,929 ..................
Base Realignment and Closure Account......................... 370,427 246,116 246,116 -124,311 ..................
General provision............................................ 55,000 63,000 .................. -55,000 -63,000
==================================================================================================================================
Grand Total............................................ 9,840,861 9,553,375 10,003,000 +162,139 +449,625
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compliance With Section 308 of the Budget Control Act
Section 308(a) of the Budget and Impoundment Control Act of
1974 (Public Law 93-344) requires that the Committee include in
its report a comparison of its recommendations with levels
contained in the first concurrent resolution. Appropriate data
are reflected below:
BUDGETARY IMPACT OF BILL
PREPARED IN CONSULTATION WITH THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE PURSUANT TO SEC. 308(a), PUBLIC LAW 93-344, AS
AMENDED
[In millions of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget authority Outlays
---------------------------------------------------------
Committee Amount of Committee Amount of
allocation \1\ bill allocation \1\ bill
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparison of amounts in the bill with Committee
allocations to its subcommittees of amounts in the
Budget Resolution for 2005: Subcommittee on Military
Construction:
Discretionary..................................... NA 10,003 NA \1\ 9,995
Projection of outlays associated with the
recommendation:
2005.............................................. .............. ........... .............. \2\ 2,438
2006.............................................. .............. ........... .............. 3,591
2007.............................................. .............. ........... .............. 2,244
2008.............................................. .............. ........... .............. 939
2009 and future years............................. .............. ........... .............. 669
Financial assistance to State and local governments NA ........... NA ...........
for 2005............................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Includes outlays from prior-year budget authority.
\2\ Excludes outlays from prior-year budget authority.
NA: Not applicable.
Committee Recommendation
The Committee recommends new fiscal year 2005
appropriations of $10,003,000,000. This is $449,625,000 over
the budget request, and $687,000,000 above the appropriations
for fiscal year 2004. The basis for this recommendation is
contained in the following ``Items of special interest,'' and
under the discussions pertaining to each individual
appropriation. Complete project detail is provided in the
tables at the end of the report.
ITEMS OF SPECIAL INTEREST
HEARINGS
The Subcommittee on Military Construction held two hearings
on the fiscal year 2005 budget request. On March 30, 2004, the
subcommittee heard testimony from representatives of the
Department of Defense and the United States Air Force
concerning fiscal year 2005 budget priorities, base realignment
and closure [BRAC], and the impending restructuring of United
States military facilities overseas. On April 7, 2004 the
subcommittee held a hearing on the budget requests of the
United States Army and United States Navy.
SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS
The budget request for fiscal year 2005 reflects an
increase of $237,375,000 from the amount enacted in fiscal year
2004.
The Committee recommends an additional $449,625,000 above
the fiscal year 2005 budget request. The total recommended
appropriation for fiscal year 2005 is $10,003,000,000, an
increase of $687,000,000 from fiscal year 2004 funding.
OVERSEAS MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
The Committee continues to be concerned about expenditures
for military facilities outside the United States. The report
accompanying the fiscal year 2004 Military Construction
Appropriations bill noted that the Department of Defense was
more than a year overdue in reporting to this Committee on its
overseas basing master plan. In the face of great uncertainty
over future basing, the Committee declined funding for numerous
overseas construction projects.
A year later, the master plan still has not been received,
and the Department has yet to announce the results of its
global basing and presence study. The Committee recognizes the
Department's efforts, in the absence of a completed plan, to
reduce somewhat its request for overseas construction, and
concurs with that decision. However, in the face of continued
uncertainty about the future of the U.S. military presence
overseas, the Committee recommends against funding several
construction projects outside the United States. The Committee
looks forward to the opportunity to carefully consider the
Department's plans, once they are released, as well as the
report of the Commission on the Review of the Overseas Military
Facility Structure of the United States.
OVERSEAS BASING COMMISSION
The fiscal year 2004 Military Construction Appropriations
Act (Public Law 108-132) created the Commission on Review of
Overseas Military Facility Structure of the United States (the
Overseas Basing Commission) to provide Congress an independent
assessment of the Nation's requirement for overseas military
bases. The Commission's final report to the Congress and the
President will help inform the Base Realignment and Closure
[BRAC] process, congressional consideration of the Department's
global basing and presence plan, and congressional
consideration of the fiscal year 2006 military construction
appropriations request.
Although the Department expressed its opposition to
creation of the Commission, the Commission became law when the
President signed the fiscal year 2004 Military Construction
Appropriations Act on November 22, 2003. The law provides that
``the Commission may secure directly from any Federal
department or agency such information as the Commission
considers necessary . . .''. The law also provides authority
for the Department of Defense to detail to the Commission any
employee, without compensation. Regardless of the Department's
original antipathy, the Commission is law and the Committee
expects the Defense Department's full cooperation with the
Commission on these and all matters provided for in the
authorizing legislation.
Because of delays in the appointment of commissioners, the
establishment of suitable Commission facilities, and the
submission to the Congress of the Department's global basing
and presence plan, the deadline for the Commission's final
report is extended to August 15, 2005. This will make the
Commission's life coterminal with its funding, which under
current law expires September 30, 2005, and will provide an
opportunity for the Commission to interact with the Base
Closure and Realignment Commission, whose members need not be
appointed until March 15, 2005. However, in order to inform
both BRAC and consideration of the fiscal year 2006 military
construction appropriations bill, the committee urges the
Overseas Basing Commission to present its preliminary
conclusions to the Congress no later than March 31, 2005.
UNPROGRAMMED PROJECTS
The Committee is greatly concerned about the increasing
frequency with which the Department has submitted requests for
out-of-cycle and over-threshold construction projects
purporting to rectify ``life/safety/health'' deficiencies. This
justification has been used especially often to justify
projects, such as new gates or large vehicle inspection
facilities, intended to correct anti-terrorism/force protection
[ATFP] deficiencies.
The Committee fully recognizes the need to improve security
and provide adequate protection to personnel working and living
on military installations. In the fiscal year 2002 supplemental
appropriation for the Department of Defense, the Committee
provided broad authority to expend appropriations from the
Defense Emergency Response Fund [DERF] for just such military
construction projects, including some $113,000,000 for access
control initiatives identified by the Department.
However, as reiterated in the Senate Armed Services
Committee report accompanying the fiscal year 2004 National
Defense Authorization Act, the life/safety/health exception is
intended solely for urgent construction projects addressing
deficiencies whose sudden emergence could not have been
anticipated and which pose so immediate a threat to the life,
safety, or health of personnel that their correction cannot
wait until the next appropriation cycle. The exception is not
intended as a catch-all provision enabling the Department to
use excess funds for miscellaneous projects for which it has
failed to properly program. Unfortunately, the Department
appears to view the provision in just such a way as it has
submitted numerous projects under the rubric of life/safety/
health that do not meet these criteria. For example:
--The Navy cited this provision as justification for building
a shooting range in Bahrain, on the theory that sailors
not properly trained in small arms would be unable to
carry out their defensive mission, thus endangering
their lives and those of their comrades. While the
Committee firmly believes in providing adequate
resources to support training requirements, there is
virtually no construction project--tank ranges,
aircraft simulators, recruit training barracks--which
could not be justified under such an expansive
definition of ``life/safety/health.'' Such an expansive
reading renders the exception meaningless.
--The Air Force notified the Committee in June 2004--three
quarters of the way through fiscal year 2004--of its
intent to correct ``life/safety/health'' ATFP
deficiencies that ``were identified and fully defined
in mid fiscal year 2003.'' If these deficiencies truly
posed an immediate threat to the life, safety or health
of personnel, the Air Force was woefully negligent in
waiting 15 months to correct them. The Committee
prefers to believe that the Air Force is merely
attempting to use this exception as a convenient excuse
to meet a requirement for which it had not budgeted.
--On April 9, 2003, the Department notified the Committee of
its intent to expend $29,500,000 of DERF funds to
improve gate security at seven Army bases in the United
States. In February 2004, the Army cited ``life/safety/
health'' as the authority to proceed with several of
the same projects, asserting that the security
deficiencies posed ``unacceptable and imminent risk to
personnel.'' Asked why the projects had not been
executed in accordance with the previous year's
notification, the Army explained that the Office of the
Secretary of Defense had withdrawn the funding--without
notifying Congress--to use it for other purposes. If
the Department itself did not feel sufficient urgency
to execute the projects nearly a year earlier, when it
not only had the funding available but also had
notified the Congress of its intention to proceed, it
is difficult for the Committee to take seriously later
claims of imminent life/safety/health risks.
Force protection is a serious matter; the Committee treats
it as such and is committed to providing the resources
necessary to adequately protect Department personnel. However,
nearly 3 years after September 11, it is unthinkable that the
Department continues to discover force protection deficiencies
that require immediate remediation. Indeed, in light of the
Committee's appreciation for the capabilities and competence of
the Department, it is not credible that the Department is
unaware of such deficiencies and is unable to program for them.
The Department's credibility is also becoming strained with
respect to projects justified as ``emergency'' construction
under Section 2803, Title 10, USC. This provision has been
cited to justify unauthorized construction projects that the
Department reasonably should have been able to anticipate and
program for, or which are of questionable urgency.
The Committee will scrutinize carefully any out-of-cycle
construction projects justified on the basis of life/safety/
health or emergency considerations to ensure there is
compelling evidence that such projects meet these criteria. The
Committee directs the Department to submit to congressional
defense committees no later than December 31, 2004, a
comprehensive list of outstanding antiterrorism/force
protection construction requirements for United States military
bases, including the location, project description, estimated
cost, and fiscal year in which the project is expected to be
funded.
ANTI-TERRORIST/FORCE PROTECTION [ATFP] CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY
Revised ATFP standards have imposed significant additional
requirements on military construction, including greater blast
resistance, increased standoff distances, and resistance to
chemical and biological weapons. These requirements make it
imperative that the United States employs the most cost-
effective technology to enhance the security of its military
personnel. The Committee is aware that the Ministry of Defense
of the United Kingdom has accepted for use a steel sandwich
construction system comprising two steel plates separated by
transverse steel bars and capable of being filled with various
materials which provide a range of protection levels. The
Committee directs the Department to examine the potential
suitability of this technology for use in U.S. military
construction and to report its findings to the Committee no
later than December 31, 2004.
STEEL FRAMING
The Committee understands that the Department currently
uses cold-formed steel for the framing of both residential and
non-residential construction projects in tropical and coastal
regions. Steel is more resistant than other building materials
to the hurricane, mold, rot, and insect problems indigenous to
those areas. Further, steel is fire resistant, domestically
produced, and can have lower life cycle costs. The Committee
applauds the Department for its current use, and encourages the
Department to expand the use of steel framing to other regions
as well.
BARRACKS CONSTRUCTION
The fiscal year 2005 budget request includes $1,035,895,000
to construct or modernize 35 barracks projects.
The Committee recommends $1,015,145,000 for barracks
construction projects in fiscal year 2005, a decrease of
$20,750,000 from the budget request.
CHARTER SCHOOLS
The Committee notes that the military housing privatization
program has been very successful in improving the quality of
housing for military families and has encouraged more military
families with school age children to live on or adjacent to
military installations. The Committee also recognizes that the
privatization program can impact the demographics of the
communities surrounding military installations, and has a
potentially significant impact on some local school districts.
In view of the current Base Realignment and Closure process and
the Defense Department's Global Posture Review, both of which
could consolidate more military families at fewer
installations, the Committee believes it is increasingly
important to understand the impact of housing privatization on
local educational resources. The privatization program has
generated various approaches to address the resultant
educational impact on local communities. One particularly
innovative example is the charter school at the Naval Air
Station Joint Reserve Base, Belle Chasse, Louisiana. The
Committee urges the Secretary of Defense to study the
feasibility of using charter schools in conjunction with the
privatization program to address military school requirements,
and to explore the feasibility of using the Belle Chasse
charter school as a model to be replicated in other parts of
the country.
BARRACKS CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Service Installation Project Request Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alaska......................... Army...................... Fort Richardson.............. Barracks Complex (60 Person)........................................ 7,600 7,600
Army...................... Fort Wainwright.............. Barracks Complex--Lorraine Road (144 Person)........................ 39,815 39,815
Army...................... Fort Wainwright.............. Barracks Complex Renewal--Santiago Road (144 Person)................ 30,912 30,912
Arizona........................ Navy...................... Yuma......................... Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (150 Room)............................... 18,740 18,740
Air Force................. Luke AFB..................... Dormitory (120 Room)................................................ 10,000 10,000
California..................... Navy...................... Camp Pendleton............... Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (200 Room)............................... 19,975 19,975
Colorado....................... Army...................... Fort Carson.................. Barracks Complex--Hospital Area (128 Person)........................ 14,108 14,108
Georgia........................ Army...................... Fort Benning................. Barracks Complex--Kelley Hill/Main Post (456 Person)................ 49,565 49,565
Army...................... Fort Stewart................. Barracks Complex--5Th & 16Th St Ph 2 (336 Person)................... 32,950 32,950
Hawaii......................... Army...................... Schofield Barracks........... Barracks Complex Renewal--Capron Ave Ph 3 (200 Person).............. 48,000 48,000
Army...................... Schofield Barracks........... Barracks Complex--Quad E, Ph 2 (150 Person)......................... 36,000 36,000
Illinois....................... Navy...................... Great Lakes.................. RTC Barracks (1,056 Person)......................................... 35,920 35,920
Navy...................... Great Lakes.................. RTC Barracks (1,056 Person)......................................... 38,851 38,851
Kansas......................... Army...................... Fort Riley................... Barracks Complex Renewal (312 Person)............................... 41,000 41,000
Kentucky....................... Army...................... Fort Campbell................ Barracks Complex--42Nd St/Indiana Ave Ph 1 (504 Person)............. 30,000 30,000
Louisiana...................... Air Force................. Barksdale AFB................ Dormitory (168 Room)................................................ 13,800 13,800
Minnesota...................... Air National Guard........ Duluth IAP................... Air Sovereignty Alert--Crew Quarters (12 Person).................... 3,000 3,000
New York....................... Army...................... Fort Drum.................... Barracks Complex--Wheeler Sack AAF Ph 2 (480 Person)................ 48,000 48,000
North Carolina................. Army...................... Fort Bragg................... Barracks Complex Renewal Blackjack St Ph 1 (200 Person)............. 49,000 49,000
Army...................... Fort Bragg................... Barracks Complex--Bastogne Dr Ph 2 (768 Person)..................... 48,000 48,000
Army...................... Fort Bragg................... Barracks Complex--Donovan Street Ph 5 (240 Person).................. 15,500 15,500
Navy...................... New River.................... Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (216 Room)............................... 20,780 20,780
Texas.......................... Army...................... Fort Hood.................... Barracks Complex (480 Person)....................................... 49,888 49,888
Air Force................. Sheppard AFB................. Student Dormitory (300 Room)........................................ 29,000 29,000
Virginia....................... Army...................... Fort Myer.................... Barracks Complex--Sheridan Ave Ph 1 (420 Person).................... 49,526 49,526
Navy...................... Quantico..................... Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (130 Room)............................... 15,090 15,090
Washington..................... Army...................... Fort Lewis................... Barracks Complex--41St Div Dr/B St Ph 2 (420 Person)................ 48,000 48,000
Navy...................... Bremerton.................... BEQ--Shipboard Ashore (198 Room) [Phase I].......................... 34,125 34,125
Bahamas........................ Navy...................... Andros Island................ Bachelor Quarters (76 Room)......................................... 20,750 ..............
Greenland...................... Air Force................. Thule AB..................... Dorm (72 Room)...................................................... 19,800 19,800
Germany........................ Army...................... Grafenwoehr.................. Barracks Complex.................................................... 28,500 28,500
Army...................... Grafenwoehr.................. Barracks Complex--Brigade........................................... 34,000 34,000
Korea.......................... Air Force................. Kunsan AB.................... Dormitory (144 Room)................................................ 18,550 18,550
Air Force................. Kunsan AB.................... Dormitory (144 Room)................................................ 18,550 18,550
Air Force................. Osan AB...................... Dormitory (156 Room)................................................ 18,600 18,600
-------------------------------
Total.................... .......................... ............................. .................................................................... 1,035,895 1,015,145
===============================
Army Total..................... .......................... ............................. .................................................................... 700,364 700,364
Navy Total..................... .......................... ............................. .................................................................... 204,231 183,481
Air Force Total................ .......................... ............................. .................................................................... 128,300 128,300
Air National Guard Total....... .......................... ............................. .................................................................... 3,000 3,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONFORMANCE WITH AUTHORIZATION BILL
The Committee strongly supports the authorization-
appropriation process. However, the Committee has reported the
appropriation bill prior to completion of the authorization
process. Therefore, the Committee has provided construction
funds for specific projects which were included in the Senate
version of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2005.
REPROGRAMMING RULES/CRITERIA
The following rules apply for all military construction and
family housing reprogrammings. A project or account (including
the sub-elements of an account) which has been specifically
reduced by the Congress in acting on the appropriation request
is considered to be a congressional interest item. A prior
approval reprogramming is required for any increase to an item
that has been specifically reduced by the Congress.
Accordingly, no below threshold reprogrammings to an item
specifically reduced by the Congress are permitted.
The reprogramming criteria that apply to military
construction projects (25 percent of the funded amount or
$2,000,000, whichever is less) continue to apply to new housing
construction projects and to improvements over $2,000,000. To
provide the individual Services the flexibility to proceed with
construction contracts without disruption or delay, the costs
associated with environmental hazard remediation such as
asbestos removal, radon abatement, lead-based paint removal or
abatement, and any other legislated environmental hazard
remediation may be excluded, provided that such remediation
requirements could not be reasonably anticipated at the time of
budget submission. This exclusion applies to projects
authorized in the budget year, and also projects authorized in
prior years for which construction contracts have not been
completed.
Furthermore, in instances where a prior approval
reprogramming request for a project or account has been
approved by the Committee, the amount approved becomes the new
base for any future increase or decrease via below threshold
reprogrammings (provided that the project or account is not a
congressional interest item).
REAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE REPORTING REQUIREMENT
The Committee recommends a continuation of the following
general rules for repairing a facility under Operations and
Maintenance account funding:
Components of the facility may be repaired by replacement,
and such replacement can be up to current standards or code.
Interior arrangements and restorations may be included as
repair, but additions, new facilities, and functional
conversions must be performed as military construction
projects.
Such projects may be done concurrent with repair projects,
as long as the final conjunctively funded project is a complete
and usable facility.
The appropriate Service Secretary shall submit a 21-day
notification prior to carrying out any repair project with an
estimated cost in excess of $7,500,000.
The Department is directed to continue to provide the real
property maintenance backlog at all installations for which
there is a requested construction project in future budget
requests. This information is to be provided on Form 1390. In
addition, for all troop housing requests, the Form 1391 is to
continue to show all real property maintenance conducted in the
past 2 years and all future requirements for unaccompanied
housing at that installation.
Military Construction, Army
Appropriations, 2004.................................... $1,426,724,000
Budget estimate, 2005................................... 1,771,285,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,977,166,000
The Committee recommends $1,977,166,000 for the Army for
fiscal year 2005. This is an increase of $205,881,000 over the
budget request for fiscal year 2005. (See State tables at the
end of the report for complete program recommendations.)
The Committee fully expects contracts for the following
projects to be awarded, as early in fiscal year 2005 as
practical:
Ammunition Igloo Door Installation, Toole Army Depot, UT.--
Of the funds provided for unspecified minor construction in
this account, the Committee directs that $1,400,000 be made
available for this project.
Facilities Upgrade, Camp Rudder, Eglin AFB, FL.--Of the
funds provided for planning and design in this account, the
Committee directs that $365,000 be made available for the
design of this facility.
MacGregor Range Tank Bypass, Holloman AFB, NM.--Of the
funds provided for planning and design in this account, the
Committee directs that $1,656,000 be made available for the
design of this facility.
Soldier Service Center, Fort Campbell, KY.--This project,
currently programmed for fiscal year 2009, will consolidate
soldier support facilities under one roof. During the 101st
Airborne Division's deployment and redeployment in support of
Operation Iraqi Freedom, these activities were spread out over
numerous locations and required a physical fitness center to be
shut down in order to serve as a soldier processing center.
This facility will improve greatly the power projection
capabilities of the 101st Airborne by enhancing their ability
to prepare and process individual soldiers to deploy out of
Fort Campbell. The Committee strongly urges the Army to move
this project forward to fiscal year 2006.
Taxiway Improvements, Godman Army Airfield, Fort Knox,
KY.-- Of the funds provided for unspecified minor construction
in this account, the Committee directs that $940,000 be made
available for completion of this project.
Woodlawn Road Relocation, Fort Belvoir, VA.--Of the funds
provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee
directs that $1,890,000 be made available for the design of
this project.
Military Construction, Navy
Appropriations, 2004.................................... $1,238,366,000
Budget estimate, 2005................................... 1,060,455,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,016,315,000
The Committee recommends $1,016,315,000 for Navy and Marine
Corps military construction for fiscal year 2005. This amount
is a decrease of $44,140,000 from the fiscal year 2005 budget
request. (See State tables at the end of the report for
complete program recommendations.)
The Committee fully expects contracts for the following
project to be awarded, as early in fiscal year 2005 as
practical:
Waterfront Operations Facilities, Kaneohe Bay, HI.--Of the
funds provided for planning and design in this account, the
Committee directs that $600,000 be made available for the
design of these facilities.
Military Construction, Air Force
Appropriations, 2004.................................... $1,337,301,000
Budget estimate, 2005................................... 663,964,000
Committee recommendation................................ 841,131,000
The Committee recommends $841,131,000 for the Air Force in
fiscal year 2005. This is an increase of $177,167,000 from the
fiscal year 2005 budget request. (See State tables at the end
of the report for complete program recommendations.)
SPANGDAHLEM AIR BASE, GERMANY
Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany, currently hosts an Air Force
fighter wing and is an integral part of the program to move
airlift capabilities from Rhein Main Air Base. The future of
the fighter presence at Spangdahlem is uncertain in light of
the Department's ongoing global basing and presence review, but
given significant investments made under the Rhein Main
Transition Program, a continued U.S. presence at this base is
likely. Increased military construction requirements are
already forcing an expansion into areas northwest of the base,
and future plans call for the potential acquisition of still
more land outside the base's current boundaries. However,
significant acreage around the Spangdahlem flight line is
occupied by aging hardened shelters in which fighter aircraft
are housed. These shelters provide substandard work space, are
expensive to maintain, and are arrayed to enhance the security
of the aircraft, not to maximize the utilization of space. A
legacy of the cold war, the aircraft shelters may not be
appropriate to current and projected military requirements;
demolishing them and putting the space to better use may be a
more cost-effective alternative to further expansion of the
base. The Committee directs the Air Force to examine this
alternative, given projected military requirements at
Spangdahlem, and report its findings to the congressional
defense committees no later than January 31, 2005.
SCOTT AIR FORCE BASE, ILLINOIS
The Committee is aware of new and expanded missions at
Scott Air Force Base [IL], including procurement of C-40C
aircraft to be flown by the 932nd Airlift Wing with the 375th
Air Wing as an active associate and the transfer of C-9C
aircraft from Andrews Air Force Base [MD] to Scott AFB. The
expanded C-9 mission and the new C-40 mission will tax U.S.
TRANSCOM and Tanker Airlift Command Center headquarters and
require additional administrative and operations space/
structures. The Committee recognizes the importance of Scott
Air Force Base to our national defense. In order to accommodate
additional capacity at the Base and fully support the new and
expanded missions, the Committee directs the Air Force to
pursue options, including consideration of an agreement with
St. Clair County, Illinois, to expedite the construction of
joint administrative and operations structures at Scott Air
Force Base.
The Committee fully expects contracts for the following
projects to be awarded, as early in fiscal year 2005 as
practical:
Clear Rinse Facility, Hickam AFB, HI.--Of the funds
provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee
directs that $92,000 be made available for the design of this
facility.
Joint Regional Combat Arms Training Center, Hickam AFB,
HI.--Of the funds provided for planning and design in this
account, the Committee directs that $693,000 be made available
for the design of this training center.
Land Acquisition, Dover Air Force Base, DE.--Of the funds
provided for unspecified minor construction in this account,
the Committee directs that $740,000 be made available for this
land acquisition.
Main/Satellite Fire/Crash Rescue Station, Hickam AFB, HI.--
Of the funds provided for planning and design in this account,
the Committee directs that $1,340,000 be made available for the
design of this rescue station. This is an urgent requirement,
and the Committee urges the Air Force to retain it in the
fiscal year 2006 budget submission.
Parking Structure, Los Angeles AFB, CA.--Of the funds
provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee
directs that $640,000 be made available for the design of this
structure.
Port of Anchorage Stryker Access Road, Elmendorf AFB/Fort
Richardson, AK.--Of the funds provided for planning and design
in this account, the Committee directs that $2,000,000 be made
available for the design of this project.
Propulsion Energetics Science Laboratory, Edwards AFB,
CA.--Of the funds provided for planning and design in this
account, the Committee directs that $1,314,000 be made
available for the design of this laboratory.
Visiting Airmen's Quarters, Elemendorf AFB, AK.--Of the
funds provided for planning and design in this account, the
Committee directs that $140,000 be made available for the
design of this facility.
Water Treatment Facility, Indian Springs Air Force
Auxiliary Field, NV.--The committee directs the Air Force to
conduct a study on the feasibility of constructing a waste
water treatment facility in Indian Springs, Nevada, and report
to the congressional defense committees no later than December
31, 2004. The study should be conducted jointly with the Clark
County Water Reclamation District and the township of Indian
Springs, Nevada. The study should take into account the
proposed expansion of the Air Force mission at Indian Springs
Auxiliary Field, as well as the long term needs of the
community. Efficiencies and cost savings resulting from a
jointly constructed and managed facility should be explored in
detail.
Military Construction, Defense-wide
Appropriations, 2004.................................... $581,347,000
Budget estimate, 2005................................... 709,337,000
Committee recommendation................................ 696,491,000
The Committee recommends $696,491,000 for projects
considered within the ``Defense-wide'' account. The amount
recommended is a decrease of $12,846,000 from the fiscal year
2005 budget request. (See State tables at the end of the report
for complete program recommendations.)
The Committee fully expects contracts for the following
project to be awarded, as early in fiscal year 2005 as
possible:
Special Operations Forces Cold Weather Training Facility,
Kodiak Island, AK.--Of the funds provided for planning and
design in this account, the Committee directs that $720,000 be
made available for the design of this facility.
MEDICAL CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
The fiscal year 2005 budget request includes $183,138,000
for nine major construction projects. The Committee recommends
a total of $187,838,000 for 10 projects, an increase of
$4,700,000.
MEDICAL CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Service Installation Project Request Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alaska......................... Defense Wide.............. Fort Wainwright.............. Hospital Replacement Phase VI....................................... 9,900 9,900
California..................... Air National Guard........ Fresno-Yosemite Int'l Airport Medical Training & Security Forces Complex.......................... .............. 4,700
Colorado....................... Defense Wide.............. Buckley Air Force Base....... Aeromedical Clinic Addition/Alteration.............................. 2,100 2,100
Florida........................ Defense Wide.............. Jacksonville................. Hospital Addition/Alteration........................................ 28,438 28,438
Georgia........................ Defense Wide.............. Fort Benning................. Consolidated Health Clinic.......................................... 7,100 7,100
South Carolina................. Defense Wide.............. Parris Island................ Medical/Dental Clinic Replacement................................... 25,000 25,000
Virginia....................... Defense Wide.............. Langley AFB.................. Hospital Addition/Alteration........................................ 50,800 50,800
Defense Wide.............. Fort Belvoir................. Hospital Replacement Phase I........................................ 43,000 43,000
Diego Garcia................... Defense Wide.............. Diego Garcia................. Dental Clinic Replacement........................................... 3,800 3,800
Germany........................ Defense Wide.............. Grafenwoehr.................. Dispensary/Dental Clinic Additon/Alteration......................... 13,000 13,000
-------------------------------
Total.................... .......................... ............................. .................................................................... 183,138 187,838
===============================
Defense Wide Total............. .......................... ............................. .................................................................... 183,138 183,138
Air National Guard Total....... .......................... ............................. .................................................................... .............. 4,700
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONTINGENCY CONSTRUCTION
The Committee has provided $10,000,000 for the Secretary of
Defense ``Contingency construction'' account in accordance with
the budget request. This account provides funds which may be
used by the Secretary of Defense for unforeseen facility
requirements. The Committee believes that the funding provided
in the account is adequate to meet the needs of the Department.
ENERGY CONSERVATION INVESTMENT PROGRAM
The Committee recommends the full budget request of
$60,000,000 for the Energy Conservation Investment Program
[ECIP]. The Committee maintains a strong interest in renewable
energy resources, including wind, solar, and geothermal, and
commends the Services for the awards they have received for
renewable energy initiatives, including the Presidential Awards
for Leadership in Federal Energy Management. The Committee also
commends the Navy for its geothermal energy program at China
Lake, California. According to the General Accounting Office,
the program generates a revenue stream of, on average,
$14,700,000 a year, two-thirds of which the Navy invests in a
variety of energy conservation and renewable energy projects.
However, the other Services do not have any similar renewable
energy revenue streams, and overall, renewable energy efforts
to date represent a very small percentage of the potential for
increased renewable energy use at Department of Defense [DoD]
installations.
In fiscal year 2002, the Committee provided $10,000,000 in
ECIP funding to initiate an assessment of renewable energy
opportunities on or near U.S. Defense installations (Senate
Report 107-68). In fiscal year 2004, the Committee provided an
additional $2,500,000 to enable the Air Force, which serves as
lead agent for the assessment, to complete the study by
November 30, 2004.
It is the understanding of the Committee that the 2004
funding has not yet been released, and that the study cannot be
completed on time if the funding is not forthcoming. The
Committee is concerned that the delays have been caused by a
lack of leadership and cooperation between OSD and the
Services. The Committee believes that renewable energy holds
great potential for helping DoD achieve energy efficiency
targets and reduce energy costs. Moreover, in the face of
continued instability in the Middle East and rising threats to
overseas oil production, renewable energy resources have become
an increasingly important component of energy security and
reliability.
For these reasons, the Committee directs the Department to
release the funding needed to complete the renewable energy
assessment as expeditiously as possible. The Committee also
directs the Department to provide to the congressional defense
committees a strategy and projected budget for implementing the
findings and recommendations of the report within 90 days after
the completion of the report. The plan should include the
following elements: a detailed budget proposal and timeline
encompassing short term and long term objectives; management
and personnel requirements to execute the plan in each of the
Services; and an explanation of any changes needed in
procurement, legal, or regulatory requirements to streamline
the procurement of renewable energy at U.S. defense
installations. The plan should also provide a detailed
description of standardized processes and procedures to provide
ongoing program support and address operational, environmental,
cost, education, and technology issues.
Because of the delays over the past year, the Committee
extends the deadline for the report until December 31, 2004.
Further, the Committee directs that, of the funds provided in
this bill for ECIP projects, $3,000,000 be made available for
solar structures, including roofing shingles and free-standing
solar shade structures, to be added to or integrated into new
or existing military construction or family housing projects to
promote energy conservation as well as to provide other
benefits, including improved working conditions for military
personnel who maintain equipment outdoors.
Military Construction, Reserve Components
Appropriations, 2004.................................... $730,481,000
Budget estimate, 2005................................... 619,936,000
Committee recommendation................................ 814,281,000
The Committee recommends $814,281,000 for military
construction projects for the Guard and Reserve components.
This amount is $194,345,000 above the fiscal year 2005 budget
request. The Committee applauds the Department for its
significantly increased Reserve Component budget request but
believes funding for the Reserve Component still falls woefully
short of requirements, particularly in the face of the
extensive demands made on the Guard and Reserve in the current
war effort. Accordingly, the Committee recommends significant
increases to Reserve Component funding.
The Committee's recommended action on each Reserve
component project is reflected in the State list at the end of
this report.
The Committee recommends approval of military construction,
Reserve component as outlined in the following table:
RESERVE COMPONENT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component Request Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army National Guard..................... $295,657,000 $381,765,000
Air National Guard...................... 127,368,000 231,083,000
Army Reserve............................ 87,070,000 66,325,000
Naval Reserve........................... 25,285,000 33,735,000
Air Force Reserve....................... 84,556,000 101,373,000
-------------------------------
Total............................. 619,936,000 814,281,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Committee has added funding for specific Reserve
component planning and design initiatives. The Committee
recommendation also provides additional funding over the budget
request for minor construction activities for the Reserve
components.
The Committee fully expects contracts for the following
projects to be awarded, as early in fiscal year 2005 as
practical:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
Auditorium/Instructor Support Building, Camp Murray Air
National Guard Station, WA.--Of the funds provided for
unspecified minor construction in this account, the Committee
directs that $1,390,000 be made available for construction of
this facility.
Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range, Fort Chaffee, AR.--Of the
funds provided for unspecified minor construction in this
account, the Committee directs that $1,282,000 be made
available for the construction of this range.
National Guard Armory, Ontario, OR.--Of the funds provided
for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs
that $473,000 be made available for the design of this
facility.
National Guard Armory, Winchester, VA.--Of the funds
provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee
directs that $530,000 be made available for the design of this
facility.
Readiness Center and Organizational Maintenance Shop,
Sacramento, CA.--Of the funds provided for planning and design
in this account, the Committee directs that $2,015,000 be made
available for the design of these facilities.
Taxiway/Apron, Williamstown, WV.--Of the funds provided for
unspecified minor construction in this account, the Committee
directs that $1,500,000 be made available for construction of
this facility.
Training Area Railhead, Gowen Field, ID.--Of the funds
provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee
directs that $1,349,000 be made available for the design of
this facility.
Weapons of Mass Destruction/Civil Support Team Facility,
Fort Dix, NJ.--Of the funds provided for unspecified minor
construction in this account, the Committee directs that
$1,402,000 be made available for construction of this facility.
Weapons of Mass Destruction/Civil Support Team Facility,
Fort Meade, MD.--Of the funds provided for unspecified minor
construction in this account, the Committee directs that
$1,414,000 be made available for construction of this facility.
Weapons of Mass Destruction/Civil Support Team Facility,
Jackson, MS.--Of the funds provided for unspecified minor
construction in this account, the Committee directs that
$1,313,000 be made available for construction of this facility.
Weapons of Mass Destruction/Civil Support Team Facility,
Rapid City, SD.--Of the funds provided for unspecified minor
construction in this account, the Committee directs that
$1,500,000 be made available for construction of this facility.
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, AIR NATIONAL GUARD
Air National Guard C-5 Conversion Program.--The Committee
recognizes the importance of the Air National Guard C-5
conversion program as an essential element of the Air Force
transformation initiative. In order to keep this program on
schedule, it is imperative that all C-5 facility conversion
requirements at Memphis, Tennessee, and Martinsburg, West
Virginia, be fully funded by fiscal year 2007 or earlier to
ensure that the facilities are ready for the arrival of the C-5
aircraft in 2008. The Committee therefore urges the Secretary
of Defense and the Secretary of the Air Force to maintain the
current funding schedule, or accelerate the schedule where
feasible, to provide full funding for the remainder of these
facilities in the fiscal year 2006 and 2007 time frame.
C-5 Facilities, Martinsburg, WV.--Of the funds provided for
planning and design in this account, the Committee directs that
not less than $3,000,000 be made available for the design of
these facilities.
Fire/Rescue Replacement and Deployment Training Facility,
Hector, ND.--Of the funds provided for planning and design in
this account, the Committee directs that $702,000 be made
available for the design of this facility.
Munitions Maintenance and Storage Facility, Gowen Field,
ID.--Of the funds provided for planning and design in this
account, the Committee directs that not less than $900,000 be
made available for the design of this facility.
Pararescue Readiness Facility, Francis Gabreski Airport,
Westhampton, NY.--Of the funds provided for planning and design
in this account, the Committee directs that $990,000 be made
available for the design of this facility.
Security Police Annex, Great Falls International Airport,
MT.-- Of the funds provided for unspecified minor construction
in this account, the Committee directs that not less than
$900,000 be made available for construction of this facility.
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, U.S. ARMY RESERVE
Armed Forces Reserve Center, Houston, TX.--Of the funds
provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee
directs that $3,278,000 be made available for the design of
this facility.
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, NAVAL RESERVE
Aircraft Rescue Firefighting Facility, New Orleans Naval
Air Station/Joint Reserve Base, LA.--Of the funds provided for
planning and design in this account, the Committee directs that
$750,000 be made available for the design of this facility.
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, AIR FORCE RESERVE
Fire Crash Rescue Station, Niagara Air Reserve Station,
NY.--Of the funds provided for planning and design in this
account, the Committee directs that $702,000 be made available
for the design of this station.
North Atlantic Treaty Organization
SECURITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM
Appropriations, 2004.................................... $161,300,000
Budget estimate, 2005................................... 165,800,000
Committee recommendation................................ 165,800,000
The Committee has provided $165,800,000 for the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization [NATO] Security Investment Program
for fiscal year 2005, fully funding the budget request.
The Committee continues the requirement that no funds will
be used for projects (including planning and design) related to
the enlargement of NATO and the Partnership for Peace program,
unless Congress is notified 21 days in advance of the
obligation of funds. In addition, the Committee's intent is
that section 121 of the General Provisions shall apply to this
program.
The Department of Defense is directed to identify
separately the level of effort anticipated for NATO enlargement
and for Partnership for Peace for that fiscal year in future
budget justifications.
The Committee continues to direct that no funds
appropriated in this or any other Act for the NATO Security
Investment Program be obligated or expended for missile defense
studies.
FAMILY HOUSING OVERVIEW
The Committee has provided $4,163,814,000 for family
housing construction, operations and maintenance, and the
Department's family housing improvement fund. This amount is
$7,782,000 below the fiscal year 2005 budget request but
$343,714,000 above the amount appropriated in fiscal year 2004.
Family Housing, Army
Appropriations, 2004.................................... $1,333,886,000
Budget estimate, 2005................................... 1,565,006,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,565,006,000
The Committee recommends a total of $1,565,006,000 for
family housing, Army, in fiscal year 2005. This is equal to the
fiscal year 2005 budget request.
CONSTRUCTION
The Committee recommends $394,900,000 for new construction,
as shown below:
ARMY FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Installation Project Title Request Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alaska.................................. Fort Wainwright....................... Family Housing New Construction (100 Units)................................... 41,000 41,000
Fort Wainwright....................... Family Housing Replacement Construction (60 Units)............................ 37,000 37,000
Fort Wainwright....................... Family Housing Replacement Construction (86 Units)............................ 46,000 46,000
Fort Richardson....................... Family Housing Replacement Construction (92 Units)............................ 42,000 42,000
Arizona................................. Fort Huachuca......................... Family Housing Replacement Construction (205 Units)........................... 41,000 41,000
Yuma.................................. Family Housing Replacement Construction (55 Units)............................ 14,900 14,900
Kansas.................................. Fort Riley............................ Family Housing Replacement Construction (126 Units)........................... 33,000 33,000
New Mexico.............................. White Sands........................... Family Housing Replacement Construction (156 Units)........................... 31,000 31,000
Oklahoma................................ Fort Sill............................. Family Housing Replacement Construction (247 Units)........................... 47,000 47,000
Virginia................................ Fort Lee.............................. Family Housing Replacement Construction (218 Units)........................... 46,000 46,000
Fort Monroe........................... Family Housing Replacement Construction (68 Units)............................ 16,000 16,000
-------------------------------
Total............................. ...................................... .............................................................................. 394,900 394,900
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS
The following projects are to be accomplished within the
amounts provided for construction improvements:
ARMY CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS
[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Installation Project Title Request Recommended
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama......................... Redstone Arsenal....... Family Housing Privatization. 590 590
Fort Rucker............ Family Housing Privatization. 24,000 24,000
Georgia......................... Fort Benning........... Family Housing Privatization. 57,000 57,000
Fort Gordon............ Family Housing Privatization. 9,000 9,000
Kansas.......................... Fort Leavenworth....... Family Housing Privatization. 15,000 15,000
Fort Riley............. Family Housing Improvements.. 30,000 30,000
Kentucky........................ Fort Knox.............. Family Housing Privatization. 31,000 31,000
New York........................ U.S. Military Academy.. Family Housing Improvements.. 10,600 10,600
South Carolina.................. Fort Jackson........... Family Housing Improvements.. 20,000 20,000
Germany......................... Grafenwoehr............ Family Housing Improvements.. 5,300 5,300
Stuttgart.............. Family Housing Improvements.. 9,500 9,500
-----------------------
Total..................... ....................... ............................. 211,990 211,990
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Family Housing, Navy and Marine Corps
Appropriations, 2004.................................... $985,043,000
Budget estimate, 2005................................... 843,611,000
Committee recommendation................................ 843,611,000
The Committee recommends $843,611,000 for family housing,
Navy and Marine Corps, in fiscal year 2005. This amount is
equal to the fiscal year 2005 budget request.
CONSTRUCTION
The Committee recommends $27,002,000 for new construction,
as shown below:
NAVY AND MARINE CORPS FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION
[In thousands of dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Installation Project Request Recommended
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
North Carolina........................... Cherry Point MCAS.............. Slocum Village Replacement Phase III (198 Units).... 27,002 27,002
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS
The following projects are to be accomplished within the
amounts provided for construction improvements:
NAVY AND MARINE CORPS CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS
[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Installation Project Title Request Recommended
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California................... Twentynine Palms MCAGCC.. Whole House Improvement....... 25,702 25,702
Missouri..................... Kansas City MCSA......... Whole House Improvement....... 20,238 20,238
North Carolina............... Camp Lejeune MCB......... Whole House Improvement....... 56,165 56,165
Japan........................ Yokosuka CNF............. Whole House Improvement....... 10,000 10,000
-----------------------
Total.................. ......................... .............................. 112,105 112,105
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Family Housing, Air Force
Appropriations, 2004.................................... $1,460,773,000
Budget estimate, 2005................................... 1,710,855,000
Committee recommendation................................ 1,703,073,000
The Committee recommends $1,703,073,000 for family housing,
Air Force, in fiscal year 2005, which is $7,782,000 below the
budget request.
CONSTRUCTION
The Committee recommends $570,340,000 for new construction,
as requested, as shown below:
AIR FORCE FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION
[In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Installation Project Title Request Recommended
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arizona................................. Davis-Monthan AAFB.................... Replace Family Housing Phase 6 (250 Units).................................... 48,500 48,500
California.............................. Edwards AFB........................... Replace Family Housing (218 Units)............................................ 41,202 41,202
California.............................. Vandenberg AFB........................ Replace Family Housing Phase 8 (120 Units).................................... 30,906 30,906
Florida................................. MacDill AFB........................... Construct Housing Maintenance Facility........................................ 1,250 1,250
Florida................................. MacDill AFB........................... Replace Family Housing Phase 6 (61 Units)..................................... 21,723 21,723
Idaho................................... Mountain Home AFB..................... Replace Family Housing Phase 6 (147 Units).................................... 39,333 39,333
Mississippi............................. Columbus AFB.......................... Family Housing Management Facility............................................ 711 711
Missouri................................ Whiteman AFB.......................... Replace Family Housing Phase 6 (160 Units).................................... 37,087 37,087
Montana................................. Malmstrom AFB......................... Replace Family Housing (115 Units)............................................ 29,910 29,910
North Carolina.......................... Seymour Johnson AFB................... Replace Family Housing Phase 8 (167 Units).................................... 32,693 32,693
North Dakota............................ Minot AFB............................. Replace Family Housing Phase 11 (142 Units)................................... 37,087 37,087
North Dakota............................ Grand Forks AFB....................... Replace Family Housing Phase 2 (90 Units)..................................... 26,169 26,169
South Carolina.......................... Charleston AFB........................ Construct Huntley Park Fire Station........................................... 1,976 1,976
South Dakota............................ Ellsworth AFB......................... Replace Family Housing Phase 4 (75 Units)..................................... 21,482 21,482
Texas................................... Goodfellow AFB........................ Construct Family Housing Phase 1 (127 Units).................................. 20,604 20,604
Texas................................... Dyess AFB............................. Replace Family Housing Phase 5 (127 Units).................................... 28,664 28,664
Germany................................. Ramstein AB........................... Replace Family Housing (144 Units)............................................ 57,691 57,691
Italy................................... Aviano AB............................. Replace Housing Office........................................................ 2,542 2,542
Korea................................... Osan AB............................... Construct Family Housing Phase 3 (117 Units).................................. 46,834 46,834
United Kingdom.......................... Royal Air Force Lakenheath............ Replace Family Housing (154 Units)............................................ 43,976 43,976
-------------------------------
Total............................. ...................................... .............................................................................. 570,340 570,340
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS
The following projects are to be accomplished within the
amounts provided for construction improvements:
AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS
[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Installation Project Title Request Recommended
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alaska........................... Eielson AFB....... Construct Utility Corridor........ 3,762 3,762
Colorado......................... AF Academy........ Improve Infrastructure............ 173 173
Peterson AFB...... Improve Parking................... 414 414
District of Columbia............. Bolling AFB....... Improve Electrical System......... 310 310
Florida.......................... Patrick AFB....... Construct River Walk.............. 442 442
Patrick AFB....... Construct Tot Lot................. 100 100
Tyndall AFB....... Privatize Family Housing.......... ........ ...........
Georgia.......................... Robins AFB........ Improve Family Housing............ 24,146 24,146
Robins AFB........ Improve Infrastructure............ 1,236 1,236
Illinois......................... Scott AFB......... Privatize Family Housing.......... 5,151 5,151
Louisiana........................ Barksdale AFB..... Improve Family Housing, Phase I... 9,109 9,109
Maryland......................... Andrews AFB....... Improve Family Housing............ 36,381 36,381
Mississippi...................... Columbus AFB...... Privatize Family Housing.......... ........ ...........
Keesler AFB....... Privatize Family Housing.......... 35,854 35,854
Montana.......................... Malmstrom AFB..... Construct Access Road............. 200 200
New Mexico....................... Holloman AFB...... Privatize Family Housing.......... 24,448 24,448
North Carolina................... Pope AFB.......... Improve Housing Office............ 360 360
Tennessee........................ Arnold AFB........ Improve Infrastructure............ 1,222 1,222
Texas............................ Randolph AFB...... Improve Family Housing............ 28,900 28,900
Virginia......................... Langley AFB....... Improve Electrical System......... 1,726 1,726
Washington....................... Fairchild AFB..... Privatize Family Housing.......... 17,410 17,410
Japan............................ Kadena AB......... Improve Family Housing............ 26,722 26,722
Kadena AB......... Install Government Furnished
Materials. 843 843
Kadena AB......... Install Government Furnished
Materials. 730 730
Kadena AB......... Improve Erosion Control........... 750 750
Kadena AB......... Improve Storm Drainage System..... 110 110
Misawa AB......... Construct Storage Sheds........... 1,089 1,089
Yokota AB......... Improve Family Housing............ 16,483 16,483
Yokota AB......... Improve Family Housing............ 282 282
----------------------
Total...................... .................. .................................. 238,353 238,353
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Family Housing, Defense-wide
Appropriations, 2004.................................... $49,790,000
Budget estimate, 2005................................... 49,624,000
Committee recommendation................................ 49,624,000
The Committee recommends $49,624,000 for family housing,
Defense-wide, in fiscal year 2005. This amount is equal to the
budget request. Specific details are included in the tables at
the end of the report.
Family Housing Improvement Fund
Appropriations, 2004.................................... $300,000
Budget estimate, 2005................................... 2,500,000
Committee recommendation................................ 2,500,000
The Committee recommends $2,500,000 for the Family Housing
Improvement Fund. This amount is equal to the budget request.
Chemical Weapons Demilitarization Construction
Appropriations, 2004.................................... $119,815,000
Budget Estimate, 2005................................... 81,886,000
Committee recommendation................................ 81,886,000
The Committee recommends $81,886,000 for chemical weapons
demilitarization construction, an amount equal to the budget
request.
Base Realignment and Closure Account, Part IV
Appropriations, 2004.................................... $370,427,000
Budget estimate, 2005................................... 246,116,000
Committee recommendation................................ 246,116,000
The Committee recommends a total of $246,116,000 for the
base realignment and closure account, part IV. This is an
amount equal to the budget request and a decrease of
$124,311,000 from the fiscal year 2004 appropriation. The
Committee notes, however, that the Department of the Navy
requested no funds for BRAC cleanup, informing the committee
that it intended to expend in fiscal year 2005 at least
$115,000,000 in anticipated proceeds from the sale of excess
land from previous BRAC rounds. The Committee regards this as a
commitment by the Department and fully expects it to expend
these funds for BRAC cleanup in fiscal year 2005. With the
additional monies, the funding for BRAC environmental cleanup
and caretaker costs totals $361,116,000. The Military
Departments have assured the Committee that this level of
funding is adequate to address urgent BRAC requirements for
fiscal year 2005.
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT OVERVIEW
Since the start of the current process for Base Realignment
and Closure [BRAC], Military Construction Appropriations Acts
have appropriated a net total of $22,957,591,000 for the entire
program for fiscal years 1990 through 2004. The total amount
appropriated combined with the Committee recommendation for
fiscal year 2005 BRAC $23,203,727,000.
In appropriating these funds, the Committee continues to
provide the Department with the flexibility to allocate funds
by Service, by function, and by installation. The Committee
recognizes the complexity of the base realignment and closure
process, and particularly of the environmental clean up
requirements, and believes that it is important to give the
Department a significant degree of flexibility in order to
execute the program efficiently.
The following table displays the total amount appropriated
for each round of base closure, including amounts recommended
for fiscal year 2005.
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE
[Total funding, fiscal year 1990 through fiscal year 2005]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal year 1990 Fiscal year 2005
through fiscal Fiscal year 2004 Committee Total
year 2003 enacted recommended
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part I.................................. $2,684,577,000 ( \1\ ) ( \1\ ) $2,684,577,000
Part II................................. 4,915,636,000 ( \1\ ) ( \1\ ) 4,915,636,000
Part III................................ 7,269,267,000 ( \1\ ) ( \1\ ) 7,269,267,000
Part IV................................. 7,717,704,000 $370,427,000 $246,116,000 8,334,247,000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................. 22,587,184,000 370,427,000 246,116,000 23,203,727,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Not Applicable.
FORT HUNTER LIGGETT, CALIFORNIA
The Committee is aware of interest by the U.S. Forest
Service in incorporating Fort Hunter Liggett Army Reserve Base
in California into the National Forest System in the event that
the Defense Department determines that the base is no longer
needed for military purposes. Currently, Fort Hunter Liggett
fulfills a critical requirement as an Army Reserve training
base, and the Committee is aware of no plans to close the base
at this time. However, in view of the ongoing Base Realignment
and Closure process, and the unique attributes of Fort Hunter
Liggett, the Committee believes it is important to lay the
groundwork for the possible future disposition of the
installation.
Fort Hunter Liggett occupies 165,000 acres in an
extraordinary location, in the heart of California's Big Sur
region adjacent to the Los Padres National Forest. In an effort
to preserve and protect this irreplaceable land for generations
to come, the Forest Service is considering a proposal that
would incorporate Fort Hunter Liggett and the Los Padres
National Forest into a new Big Sur National Forest, should the
base be closed. The area is one of California's most pristine
and scenic regions. The land provides habitat for several
federally listed threatened and endangered species, and also
contains numerous Native American archaeological and cultural
sites. The area also offers outstanding recreational
opportunities including hiking, mountain biking, equestrian
use, camping, nature study, fishing and hunting. Nearly half of
the land that comprises Fort Hunter Liggett was national forest
before being transferred to the War Department in World War II.
For these reasons, the Committee believes that if the current
military use of the Forest should terminate in the future,
first consideration for use of the land should be for National
Forest purposes, for which it is uniquely suited.
In recognition of Fort Hunter Liggett's extraordinary
attributes and unique location, and in view of the potential to
preserve the land as a National Forest, the Committee
recommends a provision to give the Secretary of Agriculture,
whose agency oversees the Forest Service, the right of first
refusal to negotiate with the Secretary of the Army to accept
the administrative jurisdiction of the land that comprises Fort
Hunter Liggett for incorporation into the National Forest
System at such time as the base may be declared excess of
Federal military needs.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
The following lists general provisions proposed by the
Committee. The Committee recommends inclusion of several
proposals which have been incorporated in previous
appropriations acts, provisions requested by the Defense
Department, and new provisions. The Committee recommendations
are as follows:
Sec. 101. Restricts payments under a cost-plus-a-fixed-fee
contract for work, except in cases of contracts for
environmental restoration at base closure sites.
Sec. 102. Permits use of funds for hire of passenger motor
vehicles.
Sec. 103. Permits use of funds for defense access roads.
Sec. 104. Prohibits construction of new bases inside the
continental United States for which specific appropriations
have not been made.
Sec. 105. Limits the use of funds for purchase of land or
land easements.
Sec. 106. Prohibits the use of funds to acquire land,
prepare a site, or install utilities for any family housing
except housing for which funds have been made available.
Sec. 107. Limits the use of minor construction funds to
transfer or relocate activities among installations.
Sec. 108. Prohibits the procurement of steel unless
American producers, fabricators, and manufacturers have been
allowed to compete.
Sec. 109. Prohibits payments of real property taxes in
foreign nations.
Sec. 110. Prohibits construction of new bases overseas
without prior notification.
Sec. 111. Establishes a threshold for American preference
of $500,000 relating to architect and engineering services.
Sec. 112. Establishes preference for American contractors
for military construction in the United States territories and
possessions in the Pacific, and on Kwajalein Atoll, or in the
Arabian Sea.
Sec. 113. Requires notification of military exercises
involving construction in excess of $100,000.
Sec. 114. Limits obligations during the last 2 months of
the year.
Sec. 115. Permits funds appropriated in prior years to be
available for construction authorized during the current
session of Congress.
Sec. 116. Permits the use of expired or lapsed funds to pay
the cost of supervision for any project being completed with
lapsed funds.
Sec. 117. Permits obligation of funds from more than 1
fiscal year to execute a construction project, provided that
the total obligation for such project is consistent with the
total amount appropriated for the project.
Sec. 118. Directs the Department to report annually on
actions taken to encourage other nations to assume a greater
share of the common defense budget.
Sec. 119. Allows transfer of proceeds from earlier base
realignment and closure accounts to the continuing base
realignment and closure accounts.
Sec. 120. Permits the transfer of funds from Family Housing
Construction accounts to the DOD Family Housing Improvement
Fund and from Military Construction accounts to the DOD
Military Unaccompanied Housing Improvement Fund.
Sec. 121. Restricts the use of funds for the Partnership
for Peace Program.
Sec. 122. Requires the Secretary of Defense to notify the
congressional defense committees of all family housing
privatization solicitations and agreements which contain any
clause providing consideration for base realignment and
closure, force reductions and extended deployments.
Sec. 123. Provides transfer authority to the Homeowners
Assistance Program.
Sec. 124. Requires that all Military Construction
Appropriations Acts be the sole funding source of all operation
and maintenance for family housing, including flag and general
officer quarters, and limits the repair on flag and general
officer quarters to $35,000 per year without prior notification
to the defense committees.
Sec. 125. Limits funds from being transferred from this
appropriation measure into any new instrumentality without
authority from an appropriation Act.
Sec. 126. Prohibits funds appropriated for the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program from
being obligated or expended for the purpose of missile defense
studies.
Sec. 127. Modifies the due date for the final report of the
Commission on the Overseas Military Facility Structure of the
United States.
Sec. 128. Provides authority to expend funds from the Ford
Island Improvement Account.
Sec. 129. Provides to the Secretary of Agriculture the
right of first refusal to negotiate over disposal of any land
at Fort Hunter Liggett, California, determined to be in excess
of military needs.
COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7, RULE XVI, OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE
Paragraph 7 of rule XVI requires that Committee reports on
general appropriations bills identify each Committee amendment
to the House bill ``which proposes an item of appropriation
which is not made to carry out the provisions of an existing
law, a treaty stipulation, or an act or resolution previously
passed by the Senate during that session.''
The Committee bill as recommended contains no such
provisions.
COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7(C), RULE XXVI OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE
Pursuant to paragraph 7(c) of rule XXVI, on July 15, 2004,
the Committee ordered reported en bloc S. 2666, an original
bill making appropriations for the Legislative Branch for the
fiscal year ending September 30, 2005, and S. 2674, an original
bill making appropriations for Military Construction of the
Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30,
2005, with each subject to amendment, by a recorded vote of 29-
0, a quorum being present. The vote was as follows:
Yeas Nays
Chairman Stevens
Mr. Cochran
Mr. Specter
Mr. Domenici
Mr. Bond
Mr. McConnell
Mr. Burns
Mr. Shelby
Mr. Gregg
Mr. Bennett
Mr. Campbell
Mr. Craig
Mrs. Hutchison
Mr. DeWine
Mr. Brownback
Mr. Byrd
Mr. Inouye
Mr. Hollings
Mr. Leahy
Mr. Harkin
Ms. Mikulski
Mr. Reid
Mr. Kohl
Mrs. Murray
Mr. Dorgan
Mrs. Feinstein
Mr. Durbin
Mr. Johnson
Ms. Landrieu
COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 12, RULE XXVI OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE
SENATE
Paragraph 12 of rule XXVI requires that Committee reports
on a bill or joint resolution repealing or amending any statute
or part of any statute include ``(a) the text of the statute or
part thereof which is proposed to be repealed; and (b) a
comparative print of that part of the bill or joint resolution
making the amendment and of the statute or part thereof
proposed to be amended, showing by stricken-through type and
italics, parallel columns, or other appropriate typographical
devices the omissions and insertions which would be made by the
bill or joint resolution if enacted in the form recommended by
the committee.''
The Committee bill as recommended contains no such
provisions. deg.
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2004, PUBLIC LAW 108-132
* * * * * * *
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Sec. 128. (a) * * *
* * * * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
* * * * * * *
(3)(A) Not later than [December 31, 2004] August
15, 2005, the Commission shall submit to the President
and Congress a report which shall contain a detailed
statement of the findings and conclusions of the
Commission, together with its recommendations for such
legislation and administrative actions as it considers
appropriate.
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION
[In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Senate compared to--
Budget Committee Change from -------------------------
Installation and project request recommen- budget Budget House
dation estimate request allowance
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------
ALABAMA
ARMY:
ANNISTON ARMY DEPOT: POWERTRAIN 23,690 23,690 .................
COMPONENT REBUILDING FACILITY..........
FORT RUCKER: AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR ............ 16,500 +16,500
DEFENSE-WIDE: HUNTSVILLE: MISSILE DEFENSE 19,560 19,560 .................
AGENCY CENTER, VON BRAUN COMPLEX (PHASE II)
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
CENTREVILLE: ADDITION/ALTERATION 5,537 5,537 .................
READINESS CENTER.......................
CLANTON: ADDITION/ALTERATION READINESS 3,649 3,649 .................
CENTER.................................
ONEONTA: ADDITION/ALTERATION READINESS 4,527 4,527 .................
CENTER.................................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ALABAMA........................ 56,963 73,463 +16,500
ALASKA
ARMY:
FORT RICHARDSON:
BARRACKS COMPLEX.................... 7,600 7,600 .................
DIGITAL MULTIPURPOSE TRAINING RANGE. 13,600 13,600 .................
SNIPER FIELD FIRE RANGE............. 3,100 3,100 .................
FORT WAINWRIGHT:
BARRACKS COMPLEX--LORRAINE ROAD..... 39,815 39,815 .................
BARRACKS COMPLEX RENEWAL--SANTIAGO 30,912 30,912 .................
ROAD...............................
COMBINED ARMS COLLECTIVE TRAINING 21,732 21,732 .................
FACILITY...........................
AIR FORCE:
ELMENDORF AIR FORCE BASE:
C-17 SUPPORT UTILITIES.............. 6,400 6,400 .................
C-17 FLIGHT SIMULATOR FACILITY...... 7,700 7,700 .................
FITNESS CENTER...................... 11,957 11,957 .................
LARGE AIRFRAME MAINTENANCE HANGAR... ............ 28,000 +28,000
DEFENSE-WIDE: FORT WAINWRIGHT: HOSPITAL 9,900 9,900 .................
REPLACEMENT (PHASE VI).....................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ALASKA......................... 152,716 180,716 +28,000
ARIZONA
ARMY: FORT HUACHUCA: ARMY GLOBAL INFORMATION ............ 18,000 +18,000
FACILITY...................................
NAVY:
YUMA:
BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS.......... 18,740 18,740 .................
STATION ORDNANCE AREA............... 7,930 7,930 .................
AIR FORCE:
DAVIS-MONTHAN AIR FORCE BASE:
AIRFIELD OBSTRUCTION--HAZARDOUS 4,243 4,243 .................
CARGO PAD..........................
COMBAT SEARCH AND RESCUE C-130 5,786 5,786 .................
SQUADRON OPERA- TIONS.............
LUKE AIR FORCE BASE: DORMITORY (120 10,000 10,000 .................
ROOM)..................................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: CAMP NAVAJO: 3,000 3,000 .................
QUALIFICATION TRAINING RANGE...............
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ARIZONA........................ 49,699 67,699 +18,000
ARKANSAS
AIR FORCE: LITTLE ROCK AIR FORCE BASE: C- 5,031 5,031 .................
130J ADDITION/ALTERATION SIMULATOR FACILITY
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
CAMP ROBINSON: ARMY AVIATION SUPPORT 33,020 33,020 .................
FACILITY...............................
FORT CHAFFEE: AMMUNITION SUPPLY POINT... 13,798 13,798 .................
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: FORT SMITH: VEHICLE ............ 6,000 +6,000
MAINTENANCE & AREOSPACE COMPLEX............
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ARKANSAS....................... 51,849 57,849 +6,000
CALIFORNIA
ARMY:
FORT IRWIN:
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION COMMAND FIELD 2,600 2,600 .................
OPERATIONS BUILDING................
COMMAND AND CONTROL FACILITY........ 21,000 21,000 .................
LAND ACQUISITION (PHASE II)......... 14,500 14,500 .................
SIERRA ARMY DEPOT: RUNWAY EXTENSION..... ............ 13,600 +13,600
NAVY:
CAMP PENDLETON:
BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS.......... 19,975 19,975 .................
CLOSE COMBAT PISTOL COURSE.......... 6,940 6,940 .................
CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS CENTER...... 4,910 4,910 .................
TERTIARY SEWAGE TREATMENT (PHASE II) 25,690 25,690 .................
WEIGHT HANDLING SHOP................ 6,630 6,630 .................
EL CENTRO: APRON AND HANGAR 33,331 33,331 .................
RECAPITALIZATION (PHASE I).............
MARINE CORPS RECRUIT DEPOT: INITIAL ............ 8,110 +8,110
ISSUE SUPPLY WAREHOUSE.................
AIR FORCE:
BEALE AIR FORCE BASE:
GLOBAL HAWK ADDITION TO AEROSPACE 1,866 1,866 .................
GROUND EQUIPMENT FACILITY..........
GLOBAL HAWK UPGRADE DOCK 2.......... 8,320 8,320 .................
EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE: ADDITION/ 9,965 9,965 .................
RENOVATE JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER COMPLEX
(PHASE II).............................
TRAVIS AIR FORCE BASE:
C-17 ADDITION ENGINE STORAGE 2,400 2,400 .................
FACILITY...........................
C-17 UTILITIES/ROAD................. 12,844 12,844 .................
DEFENSE-WIDE:
CORONA: SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES 13,600 13,600 .................
MILITARY OPERATIONS IN URBAN TERRAIN
TRAINING COMPLEX.......................
NORTH ISLAND: SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES 1,000 1,000 .................
GROUND MOBILITY SUPPORT BUILDING.......
TRAVIS AIR FORCE BASE: REPLACE HYDRANT 15,100 15,100 .................
FUEL SYSTEM............................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: CAMP PARKS: READINESS 11,318 11,318 .................
CENTER (ARMY NATIONAL GUARD DIVISION
REDESIGN STUDY)............................
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: FRESNO-YOSEMITE ............ 4,700 +4,700
INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT: MEDICAL TRAINING &
SECURITY FORCES COMPLEX....................
AIR FORCE RESERVE:
MARCH AIR FORCE BASE:
C-17 ALTER HANGAR TOWER............. 2,089 2,089 .................
C-17 MAINTENANCE HANGAR (PHASE II).. 7,400 7,400 .................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, CALIFORNIA................. 221,478 247,888 +26,410
COLORADO
ARMY:
FORT CARSON:
ARRIVAL/DEPARTURE AIR CONTROL GROUP. ............ 12,400 +12,400
BARRACKS COMPLEX--HOSPITAL AREA..... 14,108 14,108 .................
DIGITAL MULTIPURPOSE TRAINING RANGE. 33,000 33,000 .................
MULTI-PURPOSE MACHINE GUN RANGE..... ............ 3,650 +3,650
AIR FORCE:
BUCKLEY AIR FORCE BASE:
CHAPEL CENTER....................... 6,147 6,147 .................
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER............ 6,100 6,100 .................
DEFENSE-WIDE:
BUCKLEY AIR FORCE BASE: ADDITION/ 2,100 2,100 .................
ALTERATION AEROMEDICAL CLINIC..........
PUEBLO DEPOT ACTIVITY: AMMUNITION 44,792 44,792 .................
DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY (PHASE VI)...
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
BUCKLEY AIR FORCE BASE: ARMY AVIATION 34,000 34,000 .................
SUPPORT FACILITY.......................
FORT CARSON: AUTOMATED QUALIFICATION/ 3,205 3,205 .................
TRAINING RANGE.........................
ARMY RESERVE: AURORA: ADDITION/ALTERATION 1,758 1,758 .................
MILITARY EQUIPMENT PARKING.................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, COLORADO....................... 145,210 161,260 +16,050
CONNECTICUT
NAVY:
NEW LONDON:
MK-10 SUBMARINE ESCAPE TRAINER...... 17,100 17,100 .................
REPLACE PIER 6...................... 28,782 28,782 .................
SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS............... ............ 4,420 +4,420
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, CONNECTICUT................ 45,882 50,302 +4,420
DELAWARE
AIR FORCE: DOVER AIR FORCE BASE: CONTROL ............ 9,500 +9,500
TOWER......................................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, DELAWARE....................... ............ 9,500 +9,500
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
NAVY: ANACOSTIA: ATOMIC CLOCK VAULT......... 3,239 3,239 .................
DEFENSE-WIDE: BOLLING AIR FORCE BASE: 6,000 6,000 .................
HEATING, VENTILATION, AND AIR CONDITIONING
UPGRADE TO DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS
CENTER.....................................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA........... 9,239 9,239 .................
FLORIDA
NAVY:
EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE: EGLIN AIR FORCE 2,060 2,060 .................
BASE ROAD CONSTRUCTION.................
MAYPORT: AIRFIELD CONTROL TOWER......... 6,200 6,200 .................
AIR FORCE:
PATRICK AIR FORCE BASE: SECURITY FORCES ............ 8,800 +8,800
OPERATIONS FACILITY....................
TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE:
F-22 OPERATIONS FACILITY ADDITION... 1,548 ............ -1,548
F-22 SQUADRON OPERATIONS/AIRCRAFT 17,414 ............ -17,414
MAINTENANCE UNIT/HANGAR............
DEFENSE-WIDE: JACKSONVILLE: HOSPITAL 28,438 28,438 .................
ADDITION/ALTERATION........................
NAVY RESERVE: JACKSONVILLE: RESERVE TRAINING 9,300 9,300 .................
CENTER.....................................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, FLORIDA........................ 64,960 54,798 -10,162
GEORGIA
ARMY:
FORT BENNING:
BARRACKS COMPLEX--KELLEY HILL/MAIN 49,565 49,565 .................
POST...............................
HAZARDOUS CARGO LOADING APRON....... 3,850 3,850 .................
PHYSICAL FITNESS TRAINING CENTER.... 18,362 18,362 .................
FORT GILLEM: RECRUITING BRIGADE 5,800 5,800 .................
OPERATIONS BUILDING....................
FORT MC PHERSON: CHILD DEVELOPMENT 4,900 4,900 .................
CENTER.................................
FORT STEWART:
AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR (SPECIAL 21,100 21,100 .................
OPERATIONS FORCES).................
BARRACKS COMPLEX--5TH & 16TH ST 32,950 32,950 .................
(PHASE II).........................
CHAPEL.............................. 9,500 9,500 .................
COMMAND AND CONTROL FACILITY........ 24,695 24,695 .................
TACTICAL EQUIPMENT COMPLEX.......... 10,200 10,200 .................
NAVY: KINGS BAY: ENCLAVE FENCING AND PARKING 16,000 16,000 .................
AIR FORCE:
MOODY AIR FORCE BASE: BASE SUPPORT ............ 9,600 +9,600
CENTER.................................
ROBINS AIR FORCE BASE: AIRCRAFT RAMP.... 15,000 15,000 .................
DEFENSE-WIDE:
FORT BENNING: CONSOLIDATED HEALTH CLINIC 7,100 7,100 .................
FORT STEWART: SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES 17,600 17,600 .................
BATTALION OPERATIONS COMPLEX...........
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: SAVANNAH: ARMY AVIATION 16,554 16,554 .................
SUPPORT FACILITY...........................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, GEORGIA........................ 253,176 262,776 +9,600
HAWAII
ARMY:
HELEMANO:
DRUM ROAD UPGRADE (PHASE I)......... 27,000 27,000 .................
TANK TRAILS--HELEMANO............... 7,300 7,300 .................
HICKAM AIR FORCE BASE: HOT CARGO PAD 11,200 11,200 .................
EXPANSION..............................
POHAKULOA TRAINING AREA (PTA):
SADDLE ROAD (PHASE IIB)............. ............ 10,000 +10,000
WEST PTA MODIFICATIONS.............. 30,000 30,000 .................
SCHOFIELD BARRACKS:
BARRACKS COMPLEX RENEWAL--CAPRON AVE 48,000 48,000 .................
(PHASE III)........................
BARRACKS COMPLEX--QUAD E (PHASE II). 36,000 36,000 .................
BATTLE AREA LIVE FIRE COMPLEX....... 32,000 32,000 .................
COMBINED ARMS COLLECTIVE TRAINING 32,542 32,542 .................
FACILITY...........................
FIRE STATION........................ 4,800 4,800 .................
QUALIFICATION TRAINING RANGE........ 4,950 4,950 .................
TACTICAL VEHICLE WASH FACILITY...... 3,500 3,500 .................
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITY (PHASE 49,000 49,000 .................
I).................................
WHEELER AIR FORCE BASE: DEPLOYMENT 24,000 24,000 .................
FACILITY...............................
AIR FORCE:
HICKAM AIR FORCE BASE:
C-17 ALTER MAINTENANCE/SUPPLY AREAS. 9,000 9,000 .................
C-17 CLEAR WATER RINSE.............. 4,300 4,300 .................
C-17 MAINTENANCE SHOP FACILITY...... 8,200 8,200 .................
C-17 MUNITIONS STORAGE.............. 1,950 1,950 .................
C-17 SUPPORT UTILITIES (PHASE II)... 2,450 2,450 .................
ELECTRICAL UPGRADE.................. ............ 8,500 +8,500
MAUI: AEOS PRIMARY MIRROR COATING ............ 7,500 +7,500
FACILITY...............................
DEFENSE-WIDE: PEARL HARBOR: MULTI-PRODUCT 3,500 3,500 .................
INTERFACE TANK.............................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, HAWAII......................... 339,692 365,692 +26,000
IDAHO
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: GOWEN FIELD: ADD/ALTER ............ 3,500 +3,500
BASE SUPPLY COMPLEX........................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, IDAHO.......................... ............ 3,500 +3,500
ILLINOIS
NAVY:
GREAT LAKES:
BATTLE STATION TRAINING FACILITY 58,200 58,200 .................
(PHASE II).........................
RECRUIT BARRACKS--P738.............. 35,920 35,920 .................
RECRUIT BARRACKS--P739.............. 38,851 38,851 .................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
GALESBURG: READINESS CENTER (PHASE II).. ............ 4,400 +4,400
SPRINGFIELD: ARMY SCHOOL SYSTEM 13,596 13,596 .................
(MULTIFUNCTIONAL FACILITY).............
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ILLINOIS....................... 146,567 150,967 +4,400
INDIANA
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
GARY-CHICAGO REGIONAL AIRPORT: ARMED ............ 9,380 +9,380
FORCES RESERVE CENTER..................
REMINGTON: ADDITION/ALTERATION READINESS 1,458 1,458 .................
CENTER.................................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, INDIANA........................ 1,458 10,838 +9,380
IOWA
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: CAMP DODGE: COMPANY ............ 3,485 +3,485
GRADE BOQ..................................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, IOWA........................... ............ 3,485 +3,485
KANSAS
ARMY:
FORT LEAVENWORTH: LEWIS & CLARK 44,000 44,000 .................
INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITY (PHASE II)......
FORT RILEY:
BARRACKS COMPLEX RENEWAL............ 41,000 41,000 .................
COMMUNICATIONS CENTER............... 3,050 3,050 .................
MAINTENANCE FACILITY REVITALIZATION. ............ 15,500 +15,500
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: TOPEKA: ADDITION/ 3,086 3,086 .................
ALTERATION READINESS CENTER................
ARMY RESERVE: HAYS: ARMY RESERVE CENTER/ 7,451 7,451 .................
ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP............
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, KANSAS......................... 98,587 114,087 +15,500
KENTUCKY
ARMY:
FORT CAMPBELL:
AIRFIELD VEHICLE SUPPORT FACILITY... ............ 2,400 +2,400
BARRACKS COMPLEX--42ND ST/INDIANA 30,000 30,000 .................
AVE (PHASE I)......................
COMMAND AND CONTROL FACILITY........ 33,000 33,000 .................
SHOOT HOUSE......................... 1,600 1,600 .................
FORT KNOX:
BASIC COMBAT TRAINING COMPLEX 1 50,000 50,000 .................
(PHASE I)..........................
SHOOT HOUSE......................... ............ 1,850 +1,850
URBAN ASSAULT COURSE................ ............ 1,900 +1,900
DEFENSE-WIDE:
BLUE GRASS ARMY DEPOT: AMMUNITION 37,094 37,094 .................
DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY (PHASE V)....
FORT CAMPBELL: AQUATIC TRAINING FACILITY ............ 3,600 +3,600
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, KENTUCKY....................... 151,694 161,444 +9,750
LOUISIANA
ARMY:
FORT POLK:
AMMUNITION SUPPLY POINT UPGRADE..... 7,500 7,500 .................
FIXED WING AIRCRAFT PARKING APRON... 25,000 25,000 .................
HAZARDOUS CARGO LOADING APRON....... 14,503 14,503 .................
PALLET PROCESSING FACILITY.......... 8,800 8,800 .................
PASSENGER PROCESSING FACILITY....... 11,700 11,700 .................
URBAN ASSAULT COURSE................ 3,450 3,450 .................
AIR FORCE: BARKSDALE AIR FORCE BASE: 13,800 13,800 .................
DORMITORY (168 R00M).......................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: CAMP BEAUREGARD: ARMY 15,738 15,738 .................
AVIATION SUPPORT FACILITY..................
AIR FORCE RESERVE: BARKSDALE AIR FORCE BASE: ............ 5,300 +5,300
SQUADRON OPERATIONS FACILITY...............
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, LOUISIANA...................... 100,491 105,791 +5,300
MAINE
NAVY:
NAVAL AIR STATION BRUNSWICK: WEAPONS ............ 4,690 +4,690
MAGAZINE REPLACE- MENT................
PORTSMOUTH NAVAL SHIPYARD: ACOUSTIC TEST ............ 7,860 +7,860
AND CALIBRATION FACILITY...............
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MAINE........................ ............ 12,550 +12,550
MARYLAND
ARMY: ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND: CHEMICAL AND ............ 13,000 +13,000
BIOLOGICAL SAMPLE RECEPTION FACILITY.......
NAVY: INDIAN HEAD: AGILE CHEMICAL FACILITY.. 13,900 13,900 .................
AIR FORCE:
ANDREWS AIR FORCE BASE:
ASA--ALTER AIRCRAFT SUPPORT 5,000 5,000 .................
FACILITIES.........................
ASA--FIGHTER AIRCRAFT ALERT COMPLEX. 11,000 11,000 .................
ASA--MUNITIONS STORAGE IGLOO........ 1,100 1,100 .................
DEFENSE-WIDE:
FORT MEADE:
CRITICAL COMMUNICATIONS PATH........ 3,450 3,450 .................
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY DEEP WELLS. 8,140 8,140 .................
RECONFIGURED CHILLED WATER (PHASE 3,417 3,417 .................
II)................................
ARMY RESERVE: FORT MEADE: ARMY RESERVE 14,642 14,642 .................
CENTER/ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP/
WAREHOUSE (PHASE II).......................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MARYLAND....................... 60,649 73,649 +13,000
MASSACHUSETTS
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: OTIS AIR NATIONAL GUARD 4,000 4,000 .................
BASE: ELIMINATE AIRFIELD OBSTRUCTIONS......
AIR FORCE RESERVE: WESTOVER AIR RESERVE ............ 4,400 +4,400
BASE: OPERATIONS FACIL- ITY...............
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MASSACHUSETTS.................. 4,000 8,400 +4,400
MICHIGAN
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: GRAND LEDGE: ARMY 27,600 27,600 .................
AVIATION SUPPORT FACIL- ITY...............
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
ALPENA: SQUADRON OPERATIONS FACILITY.... ............ 8,500 +8,500
KELLOGG: FIRE CRASH RESCUE STATION...... ............ 5,100 +5,100
SELFRIDGE AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE: JOINT ............ 9,700 +9,700
SECURITY FORCES OPERATIONS CENTER......
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MICHIGAN..................... 27,600 50,900 +23,300
MINNESOTA
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
DULUTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT:
ASA--CREW QUARTERS.................. 3,000 3,000 .................
ASA--ARM, DEARM APRON AND TAXIWAY... 4,000 4,000 .................
ASA--RELOCATE BASE ENTRANCE ROAD.... 3,500 3,500 .................
AIR FORCE RESERVE: MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL ............ 4,950 +4,950
INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AIR RESERVE STATION:
OPERATIONS FACILITY........................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MINNESOTA...................... 10,500 15,450 +4,950
MISSISSIPPI
NAVY: GULFPORT: VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITY ............ 4,350 +4,350
AIR FORCE: COLUMBUS AIR FORCE BASE: FIRE ............ 7,700 +7,700
CRASH RESCUE STATION.......................
DEFENSE-WIDE: STENNIS SPACE CENTER: SOF ............ 6,000 +6,000
RIVERINE AND COMBATANT CRAFT OPERATIONS
FACILITY...................................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: GULFPORT: ............ 4,650 +4,650
ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP...........
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MISSISSIPPI.................... ............ 22,700 +22,700
MISSOURI
ARMY:
FORT LEONARD WOOD:
COUNTERMINE TRAINING COMPLEX........ ............ 10,400 +10,400
RANGE COMPLEX UPGRADE............... 2,750 2,750 .................
WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION 15,000 15,000 .................
RESPONDER TRAINING FACILITY........
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MISSOURI................. 17,750 28,150 +10,400
MONTANA
AIR FORCE: MALMSTROM AIR FORCE BASE: ............ 5,600 +5,600
CORROSION CONTROL FACIL- ITY..............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
DILLON: READINESS CENTER................ ............ 4,786 +4,786
HAVRE AIR FORCE STATION: READINESS 2,398 2,398 .................
CENTER, ADDITION/ALTERATION (ARMY
NATIONAL GUARD DIVISION REDESIGN STUDY)
HELENA: ARMY AVIATION SUPPORT FACILITY.. 7,600 7,600 .................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MONTANA........................ 9,998 20,384 +10,386
NEBRASKA
AIR FORCE: OFFUTT AIR FORCE BASE: CONTROL ............ 6,721 +6,721
TOWER......................................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: HASTINGS: MODIFIED 1,487 1,487 .................
RECORD FIRE RANGE (REMOTE TARGET SYSTEMS)..
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEBRASKA....................... 1,487 8,208 +6,721
NEVADA
NAVY: NAVAL AIR STATION FALLON: HIGH ............ 4,980 +4,980
EXPLOSIVE MAGAZINES........................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: HENDERSON: READINESS ............ 12,853 +12,853
CENTER.....................................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEVADA......................... ............ 17,833 +17,833
NEW HAMPSHIRE
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: PEASE AIR NATIONAL GUARD ............ 4,900 +4,900
BASE: AIRCRAFT PARKING RAMP REPAIR.........
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEW HAMPSHIRE.................. ............ 4,900 +4,900
NEW JERSEY
NAVY: EARLE: GENERAL PURPOSE BERTHING PIER 49,200 49,200 .................
(PHASE II).................................
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: ATLANTIC CITY 10,400 10,400 .................
INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT: ASA--REPLACE ALERT
COMPLEX....................................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEW JERSEY..................... 59,600 59,600 .................
NEW MEXICO
ARMY: WHITE SANDS: ELECTROMAGNETIC 33,000 33,000 .................
VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT FACILITY..........
AIR FORCE: CANNON AIR FORCE BASE: DINING ............ 9,500 +9,500
HALL/AIRMEN'S CENTER.......................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEW MEXICO..................... 33,000 42,500 +9,500
NEW YORK
ARMY:
BUFFALO: MILITARY ENTRANCE PROCESSING 6,200 6,200 .................
STATION................................
FORT DRUM:
AIRFIELD ARRIVAL/DEPARTURE FACILITY. 4,950 4,950 .................
BARRACKS COMPLEX--WHEELER SACK ARMY 48,000 48,000 .................
AIRFIELD (PHASE II)................
DEFENSE LIVE FIRE RANGE............. ............ 3,000 +3,000
FORT HAMILTON: MILITARY POLICE STATION.. 7,600 7,600 .................
U.S. MILITARY ACADEMY: LIBRARY AND 34,500 34,500 .................
LEARNING CENTER (PHASE I).............
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
AUBURN:
ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP 2,472 2,472 .................
(ARMY NATIONAL GUARD DIVISION
REDESIGN STUDY (ADRS)).............
ADDITION/ALTERATION READINESS CENTER 4,406 4,406 .................
(ADRS).............................
FORT DRUM: READINESS CENTER (ADRS)...... 6,489 6,489 .................
KINGSTON: ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE 3,827 3,827 .................
SHOP (ADRS)............................
UTICA: READINESS CENTER ADDITION (ADRS). 5,704 5,704 .................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NEW YORK....................... 124,148 127,148 +3,000
NORTH CAROLINA
ARMY:
FORT BRAGG:
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER........... 2,500 2,500 .................
BARRACKS COMPLEX RENEWAL BLACKJACK 49,000 49,000 .................
ST (PHASE I).......................
BARRACKS COMPLEX--BASTOGNE DR (PHASE 48,000 48,000 .................
II)................................
BARRACKS COMPLEX--DONOVAN STREET 15,500 15,500 .................
(PHASE V)..........................
SOF SHOOT HOUSE..................... 2,037 2,037 .................
SHOOT HOUSE......................... 1,650 1,650 .................
NAVY:
CAMP LEJEUNE:
ARMORY, CAMP GEIGER................. 4,010 4,010 .................
COMBAT TRAINING POOL................ 2,410 2,410 .................
NEW RIVER:
ADD TO SIMULATOR BUILDING........... 2,270 2,270 .................
AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE TRAINING 12,090 12,090 .................
FACILITY...........................
BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS.......... 20,780 20,780 .................
NAVAL OUTLYING LANDING FIELD WASHINGTON
COUNTY:
OUTLYING LANDING FIELD FACILITIES 33,900 33,900 .................
(PHASE II).........................
OUTLYING LANDING FIELD LAND 61,750 61,750 .................
ACQUISITION (PHASE I)..............
AIR FORCE:
POPE AIR FORCE BASE:
COMBAT CONTROLLER SCHOOL EXPANSION.. 12,950 12,950 .................
INDOOR FIRING RANGE FOR COMBAT 2,200 2,200 .................
CONTROL SCHOOL.....................
DEFENSE-WIDE:
CHERRY POINT MARINE CORPS AIR STATION: 22,700 22,700 .................
REPLACE HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM............
FORT BRAGG:
KENNEDY HALL RENOVATION............. 11,988 11,988 .................
SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES COMPANY 4,600 4,600 .................
OPERATIONS BUILDING--96 CAB........
SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES COMPANY 12,000 12,000 .................
OPERATIONS COM- PLEX...............
SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES COMPANY 4,500 4,500 .................
OPERATIONS FACILITY--4 POG.........
SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES ISOLATION 8,300 8,300 .................
UNIT TRAINING FACILITY.............
SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES RESISTANCE 1,500 1,500 .................
TRAINING FACILITY..................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
BURLINGTON: ADDITION/ALTERATION 1,360 1,360 .................
READINESS CENTER.......................
FORT BRAGG: REGIONAL TRAINING INSTITUTE 6,319 6,319 .................
(PHASE III)............................
LENOIR: ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP. ............ 3,015 +3,015
WINDSOR: ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP 2,409 2,409 .................
(ARMY NATIONAL GUARD DIVISION REDESIGN
STUDY).................................
NAVY RESERVE:
ASHEVILLE: RESERVE CENTER............... 3,492 3,492 .................
WILMINGTON: RESERVE TRAINING CENTER..... ............ 7,000 +7,000
AIR FORCE RESERVE: SEYMOUR JOHNSON AIR FORCE 2,300 2,300 .................
BASE: RESERVE SECURITY FORCES OPERATIONS...
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NORTH CAROLINA................. 352,515 362,530 +10,015
NORTH DAKOTA
AIR FORCE: MINOT AIR FORCE BASE: ADD/ALTER ............ 9,900 +9,900
DOCK 1 TO MULTI-PURPOSE HANGAR.............
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, NORTH DAKOTA................... ............ 9,900 +9,900
OHIO
AIR FORCE: WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE: ............ 9,200 +9,200
REPLACE STEAM LINES/TUNNELS, AREA B (PHASE
I).........................................
DEFENSE-WIDE: COLUMBUS: REPLACE PHYSICAL 5,500 ............ -5,500
FITNESS FACILITY...........................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: COLUMBUS: 2,225 2,225 .................
ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP (ARMY
NATIONAL GUARD DIVISION REDESIGN STUDY)....
AIR FORCE RESERVE:
WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE:
C-5 AIRFIELD PAVEMENTS (PHASE I).... 4,300 4,300 .................
C-5 MULTI-PURPOSE HANGAR............ 16,821 16,821 .................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OHIO....................... 28,846 32,546 +3,700
OKLAHOMA
ARMY:
FORT SILL:
CONSOLIDATED MAINTENANCE COMPLEX 13,100 13,100 .................
(PHASE III)........................
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITY........ 14,400 14,400 .................
AIR FORCE:
ALTUS AIR FORCE BASE: BASE CIVIL ............ 10,500 +10,500
ENGINEERING COMPLEX (PHASE II).........
TINKER AIR FORCE BASE: ADDITION TO ............ 8,000 +8,000
INTEGRATED SUPPORT FACILITY............
DEFENSE-WIDE: TINKER AIR FORCE BASE: 5,400 5,400 .................
ADDITION/ALTERATION HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM....
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OKLAHOMA....................... 32,900 51,400 +18,500
OREGON
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: EUGENE: ARMED FORCES 12,635 12,635 .................
RESERVE CENTER (PHASE II)..................
AIR FORCE RESERVE:
PORTLAND:
ADDITION/ALTERATION BUILDING 315 FOR 1,640 1,640 .................
PJ SQUADRON OPERATIONS.............
CONSOLIDATED TRAINING BUILDING 3,800 3,800 .................
(PHASE II).........................
MAINTENANCE HANGAR AND PAVEMENTS.... 12,400 12,400 .................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, OREGON..................... 30,475 30,475 .................
PENNSYLVANIA
ARMY: LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT: IGLOO UPGRADE. ............ 11,400 +11,400
DEFENSE-WIDE: DEFENSE DISTRIBUTION DEPOT NEW 22,300 22,300 .................
CUMBERLAND CONSOLIDATED MAINTENANCE
FACILITY...................................
ARMY RESERVE: FORT INDIANTOWN GAP: ARMY 13,156 13,156 .................
RESERVE CENTER/ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE
SHOP.......................................
NAVY RESERVE: WILLOW GROVE: FITNESS CENTER.. 7,700 7,700 .................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, PENNSYLVANIA................... 43,156 54,556 +11,400
RHODE ISLAND
NAVY:
NAVAL STATION NEWPORT:
BULK FUEL STORAGE TANK.............. ............ 5,490 +5,490
NAVAL JUSTICE SCHOOL ALTERATION..... ............ 3,590 +3,590
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, RHODE ISLAND............... ............ 9,080 +9,080
SOUTH CAROLINA
NAVY: NAVAL WEAPONS STATION CHARLESTON: ............ 18,140 +18,140
ELECTRONIC INTEGRATION AND SUPPORT FACILITY
AIR FORCE: SHAW AIR FORCE BASE: SEWER 3,300 3,300 .................
OUTFALL LINE TO WATEREE RIVER..............
DEFENSE-WIDE: PARRIS ISLAND: MEDICAL/DENTAL 25,000 25,000 .................
CLINIC REPLACEMENT.........................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SOUTH CAROLINA................. 28,300 46,440 +18,140
SOUTH DAKOTA
AIR FORCE: ELLSWORTH AIR FORCE BASE: BASE ............ 11,800 +11,800
OPERATIONS CENTER..........................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: MOBRIDGE: READINESS 2,944 2,944 .................
CENTER.....................................
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: JOE FOSS FIELD: SQUADRON ............ 7,000 +7,000
OPERATIONS FACILITY........................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SOUTH DAKOTA................... 2,944 21,744 +18,800
TENNESSEE
AIR FORCE: ARNOLD AIR FORCE BASE: UPGRADE 22,000 22,000 .................
JET ENGINE AIR INDUCTION SYSTEM (PHASE V)..
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
NASHVILLE: READINESS CENTER (PHASE I)... ............ 9,142 +9,142
SMYRNA: JOINT ARMED FORCES RESERVE ............ 13,589 +13,589
CENTER.................................
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
MEMPHIS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT:
C-5 AIRCRAFT PARKING APRON AND 15,500 15,500 .................
HYDRANT REFUEL SYS- TEM...........
C-5 CORROSION CONTROL HANGAR........ 26,000 26,000 .................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, TENNESSEE.................. 63,500 86,231 +22,731
TEXAS
ARMY:
FORT BLISS:
CIDC FIELD OPERATIONS BUILDING...... ............ 3,600 +3,600
MISSILE DEFENSE INSTRUCTION FACILITY 16,500 16,500 .................
FORT HOOD:
BARRACKS COMPLEX.................... 49,888 49,888 .................
DIGITAL MULTIPURPOSE RANGE.......... 28,200 28,200 .................
FORT SAM HOUSTON: GENERAL INSTRUCTION ............ 11,400 +11,400
BUILDING...............................
AIR FORCE:
DYESS AIR FORCE BASE: FIRE CRASH RESCUE ............ 11,000 +11,000
STATION................................
LACKLAND AIR FORCE BASE: SECURITY FORCES 2,596 2,596 .................
TRAINING EXPAN- SION..................
SHEPPARD AIR FORCE BASE:
F-22 TECHNICAL TRAINING FACILITY.... 21,284 21,284 .................
STUDENT DORMITORY (300 ROOM)........ 29,000 29,000 .................
DEFENSE-WIDE: KINGSVILLE: REPLACE JET FUEL 3,900 3,900 .................
STORAGE TANK...............................
AIR FORCE RESERVE:
LACKLAND AIR FORCE BASE:
ADDITION/ALTERATION C-5 AIRCRAFT 1,200 1,200 .................
GENERATION FACILITY................
C-5 TRAINING LOAD ASSEMBLY FACILITY. 1,850 1,850 .................
C-5 TRAINING SCHOOLHOUSE COMPLEX.... 20,000 20,000 .................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, TEXAS...................... 174,418 200,418 +26,000
UTAH
AIR FORCE:
HILL AIR FORCE BASE:
FITNESS CENTER...................... 13,113 13,113 .................
ICBM PROPELLANT ANALYSIS COMPLEX.... ............ 7,700 +7,700
ARMY RESERVE: OGDEN: ADDITION/ALTERATION 7,932 7,932 .................
ARMY RESERVE CENTER........................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, UTAH........................... 21,045 28,745 +7,700
VERMONT
AIR NATIONAL GUARD: BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL ............ 6,000 +6,000
AIRPORT: AIR MOBILIZATION FACILITY.........
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, VERMONT........................ ............ 6,000 +6,000
VIRGINIA
ARMY:
FORT A.P. HILL:
MOUT FACILITY (PHASE I)............. ............ 10,800 +10,800
SHOOT HOUSE......................... 3,975 3,975 .................
FORT MYER: BARRACKS COMPLEX--SHERIDAN 49,526 49,526 .................
AVE (PHASE I)..........................
NAVY:
CAMP ELMORE MARINE CORPS DETACHMENT: 13,500 13,500 .................
COMMAND OPERATIONS FACILITY............
LITTLE CREEK: GATE 5 SECURITY 2,850 2,850 .................
IMPROVEMENTS...........................
NORFOLK:
GATE 5 SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS........ 4,330 4,330 .................
PIER 11 REPLACEMENT (PHASE II)...... 40,000 40,000 .................
NAVAL AIR STATION OCEANA: POST 2 2,770 2,770 .................
SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS..................
QUANTICO:
BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS.......... 15,090 15,090 .................
GREEN SIDE HANGAR COMPLEX........... 21,180 21,180 .................
HERITAGE CENTER ROAD IMPROVEMENTS... 950 950 .................
THE BASIC SCHOOL ARMORY............. 4,580 4,580 .................
THE BASIC SCHOOL HEADQUARTERS/ ............ 4,470 +4,470
SERVICES BUILDING..................
YORKTOWN: ORDNANCE HANDLING VEHICLE 9,870 9,870 .................
MAINTENANCE SHOP.......................
DEFENSE-WIDE:
DAM NECK:
SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES HIGH 1,400 1,400 .................
EXPLOSIVE MAGAZINE.................
SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES 4,300 4,300 .................
OPERATIONAL TRAINER SUPPORT
FACILITY ADDITION..................
DEFENSE DISTRIBUTION DEPOT RICHMOND:
CONFERENCE CENTER................... 3,600 3,600 .................
SECURITY ENHANCEMENTS............... 6,500 6,500 .................
FORT A.P. HILL: SPECIAL OPERATIONS 1,500 1,500 .................
FORCES GROUND MOBILITY SUPPORT BUILDING
FORT BELVOIR: HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT 43,000 43,000 .................
(PHASE I)..............................
LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE: ADDITION/ 50,800 50,800 .................
ALTERATION HOSPITAL....................
LITTLE CREEK:
BOAT SUPPORT FACILITY............... 10,500 10,500 .................
SEAL TEAM OPERATIONS CENTER......... ............ 9,000 +9,000
SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES COMBAT 12,700 12,700 .................
SKILLS COMPOUND....................
SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES GROUND 1,000 1,000 .................
MOBILITY MAINTENANCE FACILITY......
NAVAL AIR STATION OCEANA: BULK FUEL 3,589 3,589 .................
STORAGE TANK...........................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
FORT PICKETT:
INFANTRY PLATOON BATTLE COURSE...... 5,170 5,170 .................
MILITARY OPERATIONS ON URBAN TERRAIN 1,409 1,409 .................
ASSAULT COURSE.....................
NAVY RESERVE: NORFOLK: VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 3,290 3,290 .................
FACILITY...................................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, VIRGINIA....................... 317,379 341,649 +24,270
WASHINGTON
ARMY:
FORT LEWIS:
BARRACKS COMPLEX--41ST DIVISION DR/B 48,000 48,000 .................
ST (PHASE II)......................
CHAPEL.............................. ............ 9,200 +9,200
NAVY:
BANGOR: LIMITED AREA PRODUCTION AND 35,770 35,770 .................
STAGING COMPLEX........................
BREMERTON: BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS-- 34,125 34,125 .................
SHIPBOARD ASHORE......................
PUGET SOUND: AIRCRAFT CARRIER 20,305 20,305 .................
MAINTENANCE COMPLEX....................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: CAMP MURRAY ARMY 1,400 1,400 .................
NATIONAL GUARD STATION ADDITION/ALTERATION
READINESS CENTER...........................
ARMY RESERVE: VANCOUVER: LAND ACQUISITION... 2,500 ............ -2,500
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, WASHINGTON..................... 142,100 148,800 +6,700
WEST VIRGINIA
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
EASTERN WEST VIRGINIA REGIONAL AIRPORT
(MARTINSBURG):
C-5 MAINTENANCE HANGAR AND SHOPS.... 36,000 36,000 .................
C-5 AIRCRAFT PARKING APRON/HYDRANT ............ 17,000 +17,000
SYSTEM.............................
C-5 FLIGHT SIMULATOR................ ............ 4,150 +4,150
YEAGER AIR BASE: FIRE CRASH RESCUE ............ 6,000 +6,000
STATION................................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, WEST VIRGINIA.................. 36,000 63,150 +27,150
WISCONSIN
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
TRUAX FIELD: ASA--MUNITIONS MAINTENANCE 5,900 5,900 .................
AND STORAGE COMPLEX....................
VOLK FIELD: SQUADRON OPERATIONS FACILITY ............ 4,500 +4,500
ARMY RESERVE:
FORT MC COY:
INFANTRY PLATOON BATTLE COURSE...... 2,712 2,712 .................
SQUAD DEFENSE RANGE................. 1,248 1,248 .................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, WISCONSIN.................. 9,860 14,360 +4,500
WYOMING
AIR FORCE: F.E. WARREN AIR FORCE BASE: ............ 5,500 +5,500
STORMWATER DRAINAGE SYSTEM.................
BAHAMAS
NAVY: ANDROS ISLAND: BACHELOR QUARTERS...... 20,750 ............ -20,750
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, BAHAMAS........................ 20,750 ............ -20,750
DIEGO GARCIA
NAVY: DIEGO GARCIA: SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT 17,500 17,500 .................
CENTER.....................................
DEFENSE-WIDE: DIEGO GARCIA: DENTAL CLINIC 3,800 3,800 .................
REPLACEMENT................................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, DIEGO GARCIA................... 21,300 21,300 .................
GERMANY
ARMY:
GRAFENWOEHR:
BARRACKS COMPLEX.................... 28,500 28,500 .................
BARRACKS COMPLEX--BRIGADE........... 34,000 34,000 .................
BRIGADE SUPPORT COMPLEX............. 14,700 14,700 .................
AIR FORCE:
RAMSTEIN AIR BASE:
SMALL DIAMETER BOMB FACILITIES...... 1,200 1,200 .................
U.S. AIR FORCE THEATER AEROSPACE 24,204 24,204 .................
OPERATIONS SUPPORT CENTER..........
DEFENSE-WIDE:
GRAFENWOEHR:
ADDITION/ALTERATION DISPENSARY/ 13,000 13,000 .................
DENTAL CLINIC......................
ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE SCHOOL............ 36,247 36,247 .................
VILSECK: HIGH SCHOOL RENOVATION/ADDITION 9,011 9,011 .................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, GERMANY........................ 160,862 160,862 .................
GREENLAND
AIR FORCE: THULE AIR BASE: DORMITORY (72 19,800 19,800 .................
ROOM)......................................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, GREENLAND...................... 19,800 19,800 .................
GUAM
NAVY:
AGAT: WATER TREATMENT PLANT UPGRADE..... 20,700 20,700 .................
FINEGAYAN: KILO WHARF IMPROVEMENTS...... 12,500 12,500 .................
AIR FORCE: ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE: WAR 19,593 19,593 .................
RESERVE STORAGE FA- CILITY................
DEFENSE-WIDE:
AGANA HEIGHTS NAVAL HOSPITAL COMPOUND: 26,964 26,964 .................
GUAM HIGH SCHOOL REPLACEMENT...........
NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY: SPECIAL 2,200 2,200 .................
OPERATIONS FORCES GROUND MOBILITY
SUPPORT BUILDING.......................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, GUAM......................... 81,957 81,957 .................
ITALY
ARMY: LIVORNO: WAREHOUSE OPERATIONS FACILITY 26,000 26,000 .................
NAVY:
SIGONELLA:
ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS................. 7,430 7,430 .................
BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT (PHASE II).. 15,120 15,120 .................
AIR FORCE:
AVIANO AIR BASE:
ADDITION/ALTERATION WEAPONS LOAD/ 2,300 2,300 .................
MAINTENANCE TRAINING FACILITY......
AIRFIELD OBSTRUCTION--EXPAND NORTH 1,626 1,626 .................
RAMP (PHASE I).....................
FLIGHT SIMULATOR.................... 2,834 2,834 .................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, ITALY...................... 55,310 55,310 .................
JAPAN
AIR FORCE: MISAWA AIR BASE: EXPAND STRATEGIC 6,700 ............ -6,700
AIRLIFT RAMP...............................
DEFENSE-WIDE: MISAWA AIR BASE: HYDRANT FUEL 19,900 ............ -19,900
SYSTEM.....................................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, JAPAN.......................... 26,600 ............ -26,600
KOREA
ARMY: CAMP HUMPHREYS: SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM. 12,000 12,000 .................
AIR FORCE:
KUNSAN AIR BASE:
DORMITORY (144 ROOM)................ 18,550 18,550 .................
DORMITORY (144 ROOM)................ 18,550 18,550 .................
OSAN AIR BASE: DORMITORY (156 ROOM)..... 18,600 18,600 .................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, KOREA.......................... 67,700 67,700 .................
PORTUGAL
AIR FORCE: LAJES FIELD: ADDITION/ALTERATION 5,689 5,689 .................
FITNESS CENTER (PHASE II).................
DEFENSE-WIDE: LAJES FIELD: REPLACE HYDRANT 19,113 19,113 .................
FUEL SYSTEM................................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, PORTUGAL....................... 24,802 24,802 .................
PUERTO RICO
ARMY RESERVE: AGUADILLA: ARMY RESERVE CENTER 21,523 ............ -21,523
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, PUERTO RICO.................... 21,523 ............ -21,523
SPAIN
NAVY: NAVAL STATION ROTA: COMMAND OPERATIONS 32,700 ............ -32,700
CONSOLIDATION..............................
AIR FORCE: NAVAL STATION ROTA: AIRCRAFT 14,153 ............ -14,153
PARKING APRON (PHASE II)...................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, SPAIN.......................... 46,853 ............ -46,853
UNITED KINGDOM
AIR FORCE: ROYAL AIR FORCE LAKENHEATH: 4-BAY 5,500 5,500 .................
MISSION TRAINING CENTER....................
DEFENSE-WIDE: ROYAL AIR FORCE MILDENHALL: 10,200 ............ -10,200
SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES OPERATIONS/
INTELLIGENCE FACILITY......................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, UNITED KINGDOM................. 15,700 5,500 -10,200
NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION (NATO)
NATO SECURITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM............ 165,800 165,800 .................
WORLDWIDE CLASSIFIED
AIR FORCE:
CLASSIFIED LOCATION:
CLASSIFIED.......................... 28,090 28,090 .................
SPECIAL TACTICAL UNIT DETACHMENT 704 704 .................
FACILITY...........................
DEFENSE-WIDE:
CLASSIFIED LOCATION:
SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES BUILDING 2,600 2,600 .................
ADDITION...........................
SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES 4,800 4,800 .................
INFORMATION OPERATIONS FACILITY
ADDITION...........................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, WORLDWIDE CLASSIFIED..... 36,194 36,194 .................
WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED
ARMY:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:
HOST NATION SUPPORT................. 21,000 21,000 .................
PLANNING AND DESIGN................. 130,335 166,216 +35,881
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION...... 20,000 21,400 +1,400
NAVY:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:
PLANNING AND DESIGN................. 87,067 110,277 +23,210
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION...... 12,000 12,000 .................
PRESIDENTIAL HELICOPTER PROGRAMS 80,000 ............ -80,000
SUPPORT FACILITY...................
WHITE SIDE COMPLEX.................. 18,560 18,560 .................
AIR FORCE:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:
PLANNING AND DESIGN................. 140,786 180,507 +39,721
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION...... 13,000 15,240 +2,240
PREDATOR B BEDDOWN.................. 26,121 26,121 .................
DEFENSE-WIDE:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:
CONTINGENCY CONSTRUCTION............ 10,000 10,000 .................
ENERGY CONSERVATION INVESTMENT 60,000 60,000 .................
PROGRAM............................
SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND.......... 2,900 2,900 .................
PLANNING AND DESIGN:
SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND...... 10,566 13,146 +2,580
PLANNING AND DESIGN............. 22,216 23,790 +1,574
TRICARE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY..... 29,400 29,400 .................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, PLANNING AND DESIGN. 62,182 66,336 +4,154
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION:
TRICARE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY..... 3,002 3,002 .................
SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND...... 2,710 2,710 .................
MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY.......... 2,769 2,769 .................
DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING 1,497 1,497 .................
SERVICE........................
UNDISTRIBUTED................... 3,000 3,000 .................
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DEPENDENT 746 746 .................
EDUCATION......................
THE JOINT STAFF................. 7,214 7,214 .................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, UNSPECIFIED MINOR 20,938 20,938 .................
CONSTRUCTION.................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:
PLANNING AND DESIGN................. 30,845 41,269 +10,424
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION...... 4,472 14,856 +10,384
AIR NATIONAL GUARD:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:
PLANNING AND DESIGN................. 13,568 27,943 +14,375
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION...... 5,500 7,790 +2,290
ARMY RESERVE:
UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:
PLANNING AND DESIGN................. 11,225 14,503 +3,278
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION...... 2,923 2,923 .................
NAVY RESERVE: UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE 1,503 2,953 +1,450
LOCATIONS: PLANNING AND DESIGN.............
AIR FORCE RESERVE:
VARIOUS WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:
PLANNING AND DESIGN................. 5,493 7,660 +2,167
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION...... 5,263 5,263 .................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED...... 785,681 856,655 +70,974
FAMILY HOUSING, ARMY
ALASKA:
FORT RICHARDSON (92 UNITS............... 42,000 42,000 .................
FORT WAINWRIGHT (100 UNITS)............. 41,000 41,000 .................
FORT WAINWRIGHT (60 UNITS).............. 37,000 37,000 .................
FORT WAINWRIGHT (86 UNITS).............. 46,000 46,000 .................
ARIZONA:
FORT HUACHUCA (205 UNITS)............... 41,000 41,000 .................
YUMA (55 UNITS)......................... 14,900 14,900 .................
KANSAS: FORT RILEY (126 UNITS).............. 33,000 33,000 .................
NEW MEXICO: WHITE SANDS (156 UNITS)......... 31,000 31,000 .................
OKLAHOMA: FORT SILL (247 UNITS)............. 47,000 47,000 .................
VIRGINIA:
FORT LEE (218 UNITS).................... 46,000 46,000 .................
FORT MONROE (68 UNITS).................. 16,000 16,000 .................
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS................... 211,990 211,990 .................
PLANNING AND DESIGN......................... 29,209 29,209 .................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION.............. 636,099 636,099 .................
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:
UTILITIES ACCOUNT....................... 132,356 132,356 .................
SERVICES ACCOUNT........................ 36,174 36,174 .................
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT...................... 74,895 74,895 .................
MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT................... 1,333 1,333 .................
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT..................... 37,411 37,411 .................
LEASING................................. 218,033 218,033 .................
MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY............ 402,060 402,060 .................
MORTGAGE INSURANCE PREMIUM.............. 1 1 .................
PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT COSTS............. 26,644 26,644 .................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE... 928,907 928,907 .................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING, ARMY........... 1,565,006 1,565,006 .................
FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS
NORTH CAROLINA: CHERRY POINT MARINE CORPS 27,002 27,002 .................
AIR STATION (198 UNITS)...................
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS................... 112,105 112,105 .................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION.............. 139,107 139,107 .................
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:
UTILITIES ACCOUNT....................... 137,226 137,226 .................
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT..................... 20,756 20,756 .................
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT...................... 81,859 81,859 .................
MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT................... 654 654 .................
SERVICES ACCOUNT........................ 57,691 57,691 .................
LEASING................................. 136,883 136,883 .................
MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY............ 252,383 252,383 .................
MORTGAGE INSURANCE PREMIUM.............. 61 61 .................
PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT COSTS............. 16,991 16,991 .................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE... 704,504 704,504 .................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY AND MARINE 843,611 843,611 .................
CORPS................................
FAMILY HOUSING, AIR FORCE
ARIZONA: DAVIS-MONTHAN AIR FORCE BASE (250 48,500 48,500 .................
UNITS).....................................
CALIFORNIA:
EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE (218 UNITS)...... 41,202 41,202 .................
VANDENBERG AIR FORCE BASE (120 UNITS)... 30,906 30,906 .................
FLORIDA:
MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE.................. 1,250 1,250 .................
MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE (61 UNITS)....... 21,723 21,723 .................
IDAHO: MOUNTAIN HOME AIR FORCE BASE (147 39,333 39,333 .................
UNITS).....................................
MISSISSIPPI: COLUMBUS AIR FORCE BASE........ 711 711 .................
MISSOURI: WHITEMAN AIR FORCE BASE (160 37,087 37,087 .................
UNITS).....................................
MONTANA: MALMSTROM AIR FORCE BASE (115 29,910 29,910 .................
UNITS).....................................
NORTH CAROLINA: SEYMOUR JOHNSON AIR FORCE 32,693 32,693 .................
BASE (167 UNITS)...........................
NORTH DAKOTA:
GRAND FORKS AIR FORCE BASE (90 UNITS)... 26,169 26,169 .................
MINOT AIR FORCE BASE (142 UNITS)........ 37,087 37,087 .................
SOUTH CAROLINA: CHARLESTON AIR FORCE BASE... 1,976 1,976 .................
SOUTH DAKOTA: ELLSWORTH AIR FORCE BASE (75 21,482 21,482 .................
UNITS).....................................
TEXAS:
DYESS AIR FORCE BASE (127 UNITS)........ 28,664 28,664 .................
GOODFELLOW AIR FORCE BASE (127 UNITS)... 20,604 20,604 .................
GERMANY: RAMSTEIN AIR BASE (144 UNITS)...... 57,691 57,691 .................
ITALY: AVIANO AIR BASE...................... 2,542 2,542 .................
KOREA: OSAN AIR BASE (117 UNITS)............ 46,834 46,834 .................
UNITED KINGDOM: ROYAL AIR FORCE LAKENHEATH 43,976 43,976 .................
(154 UNITS)................................
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS................... 238,353 238,353 .................
PLANNING AND DESIGN......................... 38,266 38,266 .................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION................ 846,959 846,959 .................
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:
UTILITIES ACCOUNT....................... 125,459 125,459 .................
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT...................... 70,680 62,898 -7,782
SERVICES ACCOUNT........................ 26,070 26,070 .................
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT..................... 44,459 44,459 .................
MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT................... 2,396 2,396 .................
LEASING................................. 119,908 119,908 .................
MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY............ 435,782 435,782 .................
MORTGAGE INSURANCE PREMIUM.............. 38 38 .................
PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT COSTS............. 39,104 39,104 .................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE... 863,896 856,114 -7,782
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING, AIR FORCE...... 1,710,855 1,703,073 -7,782
FAMILY HOUSING, DEFENSE-WIDE
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS (NATIONAL SECURITY 49 49 .................
AGENCY) (NSA)..............................
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:
UTILITIES ACCOUNT (NSA)................. 471 471 .................
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT (NSA)............... 116 116 .................
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT (NSA)................ 13 13 .................
MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT (NSA)............. 53 53 .................
SERVICES ACCOUNT (NSA).................. 381 381 .................
LEASING (NSA)........................... 11,257 11,257 .................
MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY (NSA)...... 1,939 1,939 .................
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT (DEFENSE 3,925 3,925 .................
INTELLIGENCE AGENCY)...................
LEASING (DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY)... 30,199 30,199 .................
UTILITIES ACCOUNT (DEFENSE LOGISTICS 419 419 .................
AGENCY (DLA))..........................
FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT (DLA)............... 36 36 .................
SERVICES ACCOUNT (DLA).................. 76 76 .................
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT (DLA)................ 293 293 .................
MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY (DLA)...... 397 397 .................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE... 49,575 49,575 .................
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING, DEFENSE-WIDE... 49,624 49,624 .................
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FAMILY HOUSING 2,500 2,500 .................
IMPROVEMENT FUND...........................
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT........ 246,116 246,116 .................
GENERAL PROVISION........................... 63,000 ............ -63,000
===================================================================
GRAND TOTAL........................... 9,553,375 10,003,000 +449,625
===================================================================
RECAPITULATION
ARMY........................................ 1,771,285 1,977,166 +205,881
RESCISSION.............................. ............ ............ .................
NAVY........................................ 1,060,455 1,016,315 -44,140
RESCISSION.............................. ............ ............ .................
AIR FORCE................................... 663,964 841,131 +177,167
RESCISSION.............................. ............ ............ .................
DEFENSE-WIDE................................ 709,337 696,491 -12,846
RESCISSION.............................. ............ ............ .................
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD......................... 295,657 381,765 +86,108
AIR NATIONAL GUARD.......................... 127,368 231,083 +103,715
ARMY RESERVE................................ 87,070 66,325 -20,745
NAVAL RESERVE............................... 25,285 33,735 +8,450
AIR FORCE RESERVE........................... 84,556 101,373 +16,817
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL, MILITARY CONSTRUCTION.......... 4,824,977 5,345,384 +520,407
NATO INFRASTRUCTURE......................... 165,800 165,800 .................
FAMILY HOUSING, ARMY........................ 1,565,006 1,565,006 .................
(CONSTRUCTION).......................... (636,099) (636,099) .................
(RESCISSION)........................ ............ ............ .................
(OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE)............. (928,907) (928,907) .................
FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS....... 843,611 843,611 .................
(CONSTRUCTION).......................... (139,107) (139,107) .................
(RESCISSION)........................ ............ ............ .................
(OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE)............. (704,504) (704,504) .................
FAMILY HOUSING, AIR FORCE................... 1,710,855 1,703,073 -7,782
(CONSTRUCTION).......................... (846,959) (846,959) .................
(RESCISSION)........................ ............ ............ .................
(OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE)............. (863,896) (856,114) (-7,782)
FAMILY HOUSING, DEFENSE-WIDE................ 49,624 49,624 .................
(CONSTRUCTION).......................... (49) (49) .................
(OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE)............. (49,575) (49,575) .................
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FAMILY HOUSING 2,500 2,500 .................
IMPROVEMENT FUND...........................
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT........ 246,116 246,116 .................
CHEMICAL DEMILITARIZATION CONSTRUCTION, 81,886 81,886 .................
DEFENSE-WIDE...............................
GENERAL PROVISION........................... 63,000 ............ -63,000
===================================================================
GRAND TOTAL........................... 9,553,375 10,003,000 +449,625
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
